From: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_FETCH field / create atomic_fetch_add instruction
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 17:32:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201123173202.1335708-6-jackmanb@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201123173202.1335708-1-jackmanb@google.com>
This value can be set in bpf_insn.imm, for BPF_ATOMIC instructions,
in order to have the previous value of the atomically-modified memory
location loaded into the src register after an atomic op is carried
out.
Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 21 ++++++++++---------
include/linux/filter.h | 9 +++++++++
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 3 +++
kernel/bpf/core.c | 17 ++++++++++++++--
kernel/bpf/disasm.c | 6 ++++++
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
tools/include/linux/filter.h | 10 ++++++++-
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 3 +++
8 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 0ff2416d99b6..b475bf525424 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1255,22 +1255,25 @@ st: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W:
case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW:
- if (insn->imm != BPF_ADD) {
+ if (BPF_OP(insn->imm) != BPF_ADD) {
pr_err("bpf_jit: unknown opcode %02x\n", insn->imm);
return -EFAULT;
}
- /* XADD: lock *(u32/u64*)(dst_reg + off) += src_reg */
+ EMIT1(0xF0); /* lock prefix */
- if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_W) {
- /* Emit 'lock add dword ptr [rax + off], eax' */
- if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
- EMIT3(0xF0, add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x01);
- else
- EMIT2(0xF0, 0x01);
+ maybe_emit_rex(&prog, dst_reg, src_reg,
+ BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW);
+
+ /* emit opcode */
+ if (insn->imm & BPF_FETCH) {
+ /* src_reg = sync_fetch_and_add(*(dst_reg + off), src_reg); */
+ EMIT2(0x0F, 0xC1);
} else {
- EMIT3(0xF0, add_2mod(0x48, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x01);
+ /* lock *(u32/u64*)(dst_reg + off) += src_reg */
+ EMIT1(0x01);
}
+
emit_modrm_dstoff(&prog, dst_reg, src_reg, insn->off);
break;
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index ce19988fb312..bf0ff3649f46 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -270,6 +270,15 @@ static inline bool insn_is_zext(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
.imm = BPF_ADD })
#define BPF_STX_XADD BPF_ATOMIC_ADD /* alias */
+/* Atomic memory add with fetch, src_reg = sync_fetch_and_add(*(dst_reg + off), src_reg); */
+
+#define BPF_ATOMIC_FETCH_ADD(SIZE, DST, SRC, OFF) \
+ ((struct bpf_insn) { \
+ .code = BPF_STX | BPF_SIZE(SIZE) | BPF_ATOMIC, \
+ .dst_reg = DST, \
+ .src_reg = SRC, \
+ .off = OFF, \
+ .imm = BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH })
/* Memory store, *(uint *) (dst_reg + off16) = imm32 */
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index dcd08783647d..ec7f415f331b 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
#define BPF_CALL 0x80 /* function call */
#define BPF_EXIT 0x90 /* function return */
+/* atomic op type fields (stored in immediate) */
+#define BPF_FETCH 0x01 /* fetch previous value into src reg */
+
/* Register numbers */
enum {
BPF_REG_0 = 0,
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 48b192a8edce..49a2a533db60 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -1627,21 +1627,34 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, u64 *stack)
#undef LDX_PROBE
STX_ATOMIC_W:
- switch (insn->imm) {
+ switch (IMM) {
case BPF_ADD:
/* lock xadd *(u32 *)(dst_reg + off16) += src_reg */
atomic_add((u32) SRC, (atomic_t *)(unsigned long)
(DST + insn->off));
+ break;
+ case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH:
+ SRC = (u32) atomic_fetch_add(
+ (u32) SRC,
+ (atomic_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off));
+ break;
default:
goto default_label;
}
CONT;
+
STX_ATOMIC_DW:
- switch (insn->imm) {
+ switch (IMM) {
case BPF_ADD:
/* lock xadd *(u64 *)(dst_reg + off16) += src_reg */
atomic64_add((u64) SRC, (atomic64_t *)(unsigned long)
(DST + insn->off));
+ break;
+ case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH:
+ SRC = (u64) atomic64_fetch_add(
+ (u64) SRC,
+ (atomic64_t *)(s64) (DST + insn->off));
+ break;
default:
goto default_label;
}
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
index 37c8d6e9b4cc..669cef265493 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
@@ -160,6 +160,12 @@ void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_insn_cbs *cbs,
bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3],
insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
insn->src_reg);
+ } else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC &&
+ insn->imm == (BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH)) {
+ verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) r%d = atomic_fetch_add(*(%s *)(r%d %+d), r%d)\n",
+ insn->code, insn->src_reg,
+ bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3],
+ insn->dst_reg, insn->off, insn->src_reg);
} else {
verbose(cbs->private_data, "BUG_%02x\n", insn->code);
}
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 609cc5e9571f..14f5053daf22 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -3600,9 +3600,14 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn
static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_insn *insn)
{
+ struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env);
int err;
- if (insn->imm != BPF_ADD) {
+ switch (insn->imm) {
+ case BPF_ADD:
+ case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH:
+ break;
+ default:
verbose(env, "BPF_ATOMIC uses invalid atomic opcode %02x\n", insn->imm);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -3631,7 +3636,7 @@ static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_i
is_pkt_reg(env, insn->dst_reg) ||
is_flow_key_reg(env, insn->dst_reg) ||
is_sk_reg(env, insn->dst_reg)) {
- verbose(env, "atomic stores into R%d %s is not allowed\n",
+ verbose(env, "BPF_ATOMIC stores into R%d %s is not allowed\n",
insn->dst_reg,
reg_type_str[reg_state(env, insn->dst_reg)->type]);
return -EACCES;
@@ -3644,8 +3649,21 @@ static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_i
return err;
/* check whether we can write into the same memory */
- return check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
- BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1, true);
+ err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
+ BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1, true);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ if (!(insn->imm & BPF_FETCH))
+ return 0;
+
+ /* check and record load of old value into src reg */
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, DST_OP);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ regs[insn->src_reg].type = SCALAR_VALUE;
+
+ return 0;
}
static int __check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
@@ -9490,12 +9508,6 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
} else if (class == BPF_STX) {
enum bpf_reg_type *prev_dst_type, dst_reg_type;
- if (((BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM &&
- BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_ATOMIC) || insn->imm != 0)) {
- verbose(env, "BPF_STX uses reserved fields\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC) {
err = check_atomic(env, env->insn_idx, insn);
if (err)
@@ -9504,6 +9516,11 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
continue;
}
+ if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM && insn->imm != 0) {
+ verbose(env, "BPF_STX uses reserved fields\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
/* check src1 operand */
err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP);
if (err)
diff --git a/tools/include/linux/filter.h b/tools/include/linux/filter.h
index 95ff51d97f25..8f2707ebab18 100644
--- a/tools/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/tools/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -180,7 +180,15 @@
.imm = BPF_ADD })
#define BPF_STX_XADD BPF_ATOMIC_ADD /* alias */
-/* Memory store, *(uint *) (dst_reg + off16) = imm32 */
+/* Atomic memory add with fetch, src_reg = sync_fetch_and_add(*(dst_reg + off), src_reg); */
+
+#define BPF_ATOMIC_FETCH_ADD(SIZE, DST, SRC, OFF) \
+ ((struct bpf_insn) { \
+ .code = BPF_STX | BPF_SIZE(SIZE) | BPF_ATOMIC, \
+ .dst_reg = DST, \
+ .src_reg = SRC, \
+ .off = OFF, \
+ .imm = BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH })
#define BPF_ST_MEM(SIZE, DST, OFF, IMM) \
((struct bpf_insn) { \
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index dcd08783647d..ec7f415f331b 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
#define BPF_CALL 0x80 /* function call */
#define BPF_EXIT 0x90 /* function return */
+/* atomic op type fields (stored in immediate) */
+#define BPF_FETCH 0x01 /* fetch previous value into src reg */
+
/* Register numbers */
enum {
BPF_REG_0 = 0,
--
2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-23 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-23 17:31 [PATCH 0/7] Atomics for eBPF Brendan Jackman
2020-11-23 17:31 ` [PATCH 1/7] bpf: Factor out emission of ModR/M for *(reg + off) Brendan Jackman
2020-11-23 17:31 ` [PATCH 2/7] bpf: x86: Factor out emission of REX byte Brendan Jackman
2020-11-23 17:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other atomics in .imm Brendan Jackman
2020-11-23 23:54 ` Yonghong Song
2020-11-24 11:02 ` Brendan Jackman
2020-11-24 16:04 ` Yonghong Song
2020-11-24 3:28 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-24 6:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-24 11:21 ` Brendan Jackman
2020-11-24 22:43 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-23 17:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] bpf: Move BPF_STX reserved field check into BPF_STX verifier code Brendan Jackman
2020-11-23 17:32 ` Brendan Jackman [this message]
2020-11-23 21:12 ` [PATCH 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_FETCH field / create atomic_fetch_add instruction kernel test robot
2020-11-23 21:51 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-24 6:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-24 10:48 ` Brendan Jackman
2020-11-23 17:32 ` [PATCH 6/7] bpf: Add instructions for atomic_cmpxchg and friends Brendan Jackman
2020-11-23 19:29 ` Brendan Jackman
2020-11-24 6:40 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-24 10:55 ` Brendan Jackman
2020-11-24 22:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-23 17:32 ` [PATCH 7/7] bpf: Add tests for new BPF atomic operations Brendan Jackman
2020-11-24 0:26 ` Yonghong Song
2020-11-24 13:10 ` Brendan Jackman
2020-11-23 17:36 ` [PATCH 0/7] Atomics for eBPF Brendan Jackman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201123173202.1335708-6-jackmanb@google.com \
--to=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=revest@chromium.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).