From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2B1C2D0E4 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF94206C0 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="z0oZGxSS" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390377AbgKXQV5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:21:57 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56038 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390367AbgKXQV5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:21:57 -0500 Received: from kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com (unknown [163.114.132.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C8D120715; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:21:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1606234916; bh=GjdpPd0YVe4JnlTabDKyPkCEnuLaEUJR5g0XA7bdCPw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=z0oZGxSSCfePGNVS/cWWmpOUBbcg0VMNghCgMmErBwTxIHmeBFnBC0W5ox4PLTFCg jqL+xfVJfgYxFaNIaAZcMTF1l+Sqxt9Jzxbbpl+wClp1UqjsqNwHx+YCKF6Rot++ib z/bH3k3Wp0lX/ZdQ+nYdrJrNAXF+BvGTF+C4UGAg= Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:21:55 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFQ=?= =?UTF-8?B?w7ZwZWw=?= , magnus.karlsson@intel.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, qi.z.zhang@intel.com, edumazet@google.com, jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, maximmi@nvidia.com Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/10] net: add SO_BUSY_POLL_BUDGET socket option Message-ID: <20201124082155.1642cf1f@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> In-Reply-To: <20201119083024.119566-3-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> References: <20201119083024.119566-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> <20201119083024.119566-3-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 09:30:16 +0100 Bj=C3=B6rn T=C3=B6pel wrote: > From: Bj=C3=B6rn T=C3=B6pel >=20 > This option lets a user set a per socket NAPI budget for > busy-polling. If the options is not set, it will use the default of 8. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Bj=C3=B6rn T=C3=B6pel Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski