bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
	<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v8 09/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for cpumap maps
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 19:00:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201125030119.2864302-10-guro@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201125030119.2864302-1-guro@fb.com>

Include metadata and percpu data into the memcg-based memory
accounting. Switch allocations made from an update path to
new bpf_map_* allocation helpers to make the accounting work
properly from an interrupt context.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/cpumap.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c b/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
index c61a23b564aa..e6b234d5e3a8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *cpu_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	    attr->map_flags & ~BPF_F_NUMA_NODE)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
-	cmap = kzalloc(sizeof(*cmap), GFP_USER);
+	cmap = kzalloc(sizeof(*cmap), GFP_USER | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!cmap)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
@@ -412,23 +412,24 @@ static int __cpu_map_load_bpf_program(struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *rcpu, int fd)
 }
 
 static struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *
-__cpu_map_entry_alloc(struct bpf_cpumap_val *value, u32 cpu, int map_id)
+__cpu_map_entry_alloc(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_cpumap_val *value,
+		      u32 cpu)
 {
 	int numa, err, i, fd = value->bpf_prog.fd;
-	gfp_t gfp = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN;
+	gfp_t gfp = __GFP_ZERO | GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_NOWARN;
 	struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *rcpu;
 	struct xdp_bulk_queue *bq;
 
 	/* Have map->numa_node, but choose node of redirect target CPU */
 	numa = cpu_to_node(cpu);
 
-	rcpu = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*rcpu), gfp, numa);
+	rcpu = bpf_map_kmalloc_node(map, sizeof(*rcpu), gfp, numa);
 	if (!rcpu)
 		return NULL;
 
 	/* Alloc percpu bulkq */
-	rcpu->bulkq = __alloc_percpu_gfp(sizeof(*rcpu->bulkq),
-					 sizeof(void *), gfp);
+	rcpu->bulkq = bpf_map_alloc_percpu(map, sizeof(*rcpu->bulkq),
+					   sizeof(void *), gfp);
 	if (!rcpu->bulkq)
 		goto free_rcu;
 
@@ -438,7 +439,8 @@ __cpu_map_entry_alloc(struct bpf_cpumap_val *value, u32 cpu, int map_id)
 	}
 
 	/* Alloc queue */
-	rcpu->queue = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*rcpu->queue), gfp, numa);
+	rcpu->queue = bpf_map_kmalloc_node(map, sizeof(*rcpu->queue), gfp,
+					   numa);
 	if (!rcpu->queue)
 		goto free_bulkq;
 
@@ -447,7 +449,7 @@ __cpu_map_entry_alloc(struct bpf_cpumap_val *value, u32 cpu, int map_id)
 		goto free_queue;
 
 	rcpu->cpu    = cpu;
-	rcpu->map_id = map_id;
+	rcpu->map_id = map->id;
 	rcpu->value.qsize  = value->qsize;
 
 	if (fd > 0 && __cpu_map_load_bpf_program(rcpu, fd))
@@ -455,7 +457,8 @@ __cpu_map_entry_alloc(struct bpf_cpumap_val *value, u32 cpu, int map_id)
 
 	/* Setup kthread */
 	rcpu->kthread = kthread_create_on_node(cpu_map_kthread_run, rcpu, numa,
-					       "cpumap/%d/map:%d", cpu, map_id);
+					       "cpumap/%d/map:%d", cpu,
+					       map->id);
 	if (IS_ERR(rcpu->kthread))
 		goto free_prog;
 
@@ -571,7 +574,7 @@ static int cpu_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
 		rcpu = NULL; /* Same as deleting */
 	} else {
 		/* Updating qsize cause re-allocation of bpf_cpu_map_entry */
-		rcpu = __cpu_map_entry_alloc(&cpumap_value, key_cpu, map->id);
+		rcpu = __cpu_map_entry_alloc(map, &cpumap_value, key_cpu);
 		if (!rcpu)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 		rcpu->cmap = cmap;
-- 
2.26.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-25  3:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-25  3:00 [PATCH bpf-next v8 00/34] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 01/34] mm: memcontrol: use helpers to read page's memcg data Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 02/34] mm: memcontrol/slab: use helpers to access slab page's memcg_data Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 03/34] mm: introduce page memcg flags Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 04/34] mm: convert page kmemcg type to a page memcg flag Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 05/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 06/34] bpf: prepare for memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-26  0:21   ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-11-26  2:30     ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-26  9:56       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-11-26 16:06         ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-26 17:12       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-25  3:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 07/34] bpf: " Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 08/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:00 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2020-11-25  3:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 10/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 11/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 12/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 13/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 14/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 15/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 16/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 17/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 18/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 19/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 20/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 21/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 22/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 23/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 24/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 25/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 26/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 27/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 28/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 29/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 30/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 31/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 32/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 33/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-11-25  3:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 34/34] bpf: samples: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201125030119.2864302-10-guro@fb.com \
    --to=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).