bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
	Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>,
	Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/11] Atomics for eBPF
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:18:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201215121816.1048557-1-jackmanb@google.com> (raw)

Status of the patches

Thanks for the reviews!

There's one review comment from John which I haven't resolved [3].
He pointed out that we could make the verifier a bit smarter about
propagating register bounds. I don't have a clear picture of how
useful it would be but IIUC it would be quite simple (see my reply to
the linked mail with a proposed implementation).

Differences from v4->v5 [1]:

* Fixed bogus type casts in interpreter that led to warnings from
  the 0day robot.

* Dropped feature-detection for Clang per Andrii's suggestion in [4].
  The selftests will now fail to build unless you have llvm-project
  commit 286daafd6512. The ENABLE_ATOMICS_TEST macro is still needed
  to support the no_alu32 tests.

* Carried some Acks from John and Yonghong.

* Dropped confusing usage of __atomic_exchange from prog_test in
  favour of __sync_lock_test_and_set.

* [Really] got rid of all the forest of instruction macros
  (BPF_ATOMIC_FETCH_ADD and friends); now there's just BPF_ATOMIC_OP
  to define all the instructions as we use them in the verifier
  tests. This makes the atomic ops less special in that API, and I
  don't think the resulting usage is actually any harder to read.

Differences from v3->v4 [1]:

* Added one Ack from Yonghong. He acked some other patches but those
  have now changed non-trivally so I didn't add those acks.

* Fixups to commit messages.

* Fixed disassembly and comments: first arg to atomic_fetch_* is a

* Improved prog_test efficiency. BPF progs are now all loaded in a
  single call, then the skeleton is re-used for each subtest.

* Dropped use of tools/build/feature in favour of a one-liner in the

* Dropped the commit that created an emit_neg helper in the x86
  JIT. It's not used any more (it wasn't used in v3 either).

* Combined all the different filter.h macros (used to be
  just BPF_ATOMIC32 and BPF_ATOMIC64.

* Removed some references to BPF_STX_XADD from tools/, samples/ and
  lib/ that I missed before.

Differences from v2->v3 [1]:

* More minor fixes and naming/comment changes

* Dropped atomic subtract: compilers can implement this by preceding
  an atomic add with a NEG instruction (which is what the x86 JIT did
  under the hood anyway).

* Dropped the use of -mcpu=v4 in the Clang BPF command-line; there is
  no longer an architecture version bump. Instead a feature test is
  added to Kbuild - it builds a source file to check if Clang
  supports BPF atomics.

* Fixed the prog_test so it no longer breaks
  test_progs-no_alu32. This requires some ifdef acrobatics to avoid
  complicating the prog_tests model where the same userspace code
  exercises both the normal and no_alu32 BPF test objects, using the
  same skeleton header.

Differences from v1->v2 [1]:

* Fixed mistakes in the netronome driver

* Addd sub, add, or, xor operations

* The above led to some refactors to keep things readable. (Maybe I
  should have just waited until I'd implemented these before starting
  the review...)

* Replaced BPF_[CMP]SET | BPF_FETCH with just BPF_[CMP]XCHG, which
  include the BPF_FETCH flag

* Added a bit of documentation. Suggestions welcome for more places
  to dump this info...

The prog_test that's added depends on Clang/LLVM features added by
Yonghong in commit 286daafd6512 (was

This only includes a JIT implementation for x86_64 - I don't plan to
implement JIT support myself for other architectures.


This patchset adds atomic operations to the eBPF instruction set. The
use-case that motivated this work was a trivial and efficient way to
generate globally-unique cookies in BPF progs, but I think it's
obvious that these features are pretty widely applicable.  The
instructions that are added here can be summarised with this list of
kernel operations:

* atomic[64]_[fetch_]add
* atomic[64]_[fetch_]and
* atomic[64]_[fetch_]or
* atomic[64]_xchg
* atomic[64]_cmpxchg

The following are left out of scope for this effort:

* 16 and 8 bit operations
* Explicit memory barriers


I originally planned to add new values for bpf_insn.opcode. This was
rather unpleasant: the opcode space has holes in it but no entire
instruction classes[2]. Yonghong Song had a better idea: use the
immediate field of the existing STX XADD instruction to encode the
operation. This works nicely, without breaking existing programs,
because the immediate field is currently reserved-must-be-zero, and
extra-nicely because BPF_ADD happens to be zero.

Note that this of course makes immediate-source atomic operations
impossible. It's hard to imagine a measurable speedup from such
instructions, and if it existed it would certainly not benefit x86,
which has no support for them.

The BPF_OP opcode fields are re-used in the immediate, and an
additional flag BPF_FETCH is used to mark instructions that should
fetch a pre-modification value from memory.

So, BPF_XADD is now called BPF_ATOMIC (the old name is kept to avoid
breaking userspace builds), and where we previously had .imm = 0, we
now have .imm = BPF_ADD (which is 0).


Reg-source eBPF instructions only have two operands, while these
atomic operations have up to four. To avoid needing to encode
additional operands, then:

- One of the input registers is re-used as an output register
  (e.g. atomic_fetch_add both reads from and writes to the source

- Where necessary (i.e. for cmpxchg) , R0 is "hard-coded" as one of
  the operands.

This approach also allows the new eBPF instructions to map directly
to single x86 instructions.

[1] Previous iterations:
    v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201123173202.1335708-1-jackmanb@google.com/
    v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201127175738.1085417-1-jackmanb@google.com/
    v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/X8kN7NA7bJC7aLQI@google.com/
    v4: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201207160734.2345502-1-jackmanb@google.com/

[2] Visualisation of eBPF opcode space:

[3] Comment from John about propagating bounds in verifier:

[4] Mail from Andrii about not supporting old Clang in selftests:
Brendan Jackman (11):
  bpf: x86: Factor out emission of ModR/M for *(reg + off)
  bpf: x86: Factor out emission of REX byte
  bpf: x86: Factor out a lookup table for some ALU opcodes
  bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other atomics in .imm
  bpf: Move BPF_STX reserved field check into BPF_STX verifier code
  bpf: Add BPF_FETCH field / create atomic_fetch_add instruction
  bpf: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg
  bpf: Pull out a macro for interpreting atomic ALU operations
  bpf: Add bitwise atomic instructions
  bpf: Add tests for new BPF atomic operations
  bpf: Document new atomic instructions

 Documentation/networking/filter.rst           |  56 +++-
 arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c                     |   7 +-
 arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c                 |  16 +-
 arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c                      |  11 +-
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c             |  25 +-
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c               |  20 +-
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c               |  16 +-
 arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c                  |  27 +-
 arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c              |  17 +-
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c                   | 217 ++++++++++-----
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c                 |   6 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c  |  14 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/main.h |   4 +-
 .../net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/verifier.c |  15 +-
 include/linux/filter.h                        |  25 +-
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                      |  10 +-
 kernel/bpf/core.c                             |  67 ++++-
 kernel/bpf/disasm.c                           |  43 ++-
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c                         |  75 ++++--
 lib/test_bpf.c                                |  14 +-
 samples/bpf/bpf_insn.h                        |   4 +-
 samples/bpf/cookie_uid_helper_example.c       |   8 +-
 samples/bpf/sock_example.c                    |   2 +-
 samples/bpf/test_cgrp2_attach.c               |   5 +-
 tools/include/linux/filter.h                  |  24 +-
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                |  10 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile          |   2 +
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/atomics.c        | 246 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../bpf/prog_tests/cgroup_attach_multi.c      |   4 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/atomics.c   | 154 +++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c       |   2 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_and.c       |  77 ++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c   |  96 +++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_fetch_add.c | 106 ++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_or.c        |  77 ++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_xchg.c      |  46 ++++
 .../selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_xor.c       |  77 ++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx.c    |   7 +-
 .../bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c       |   4 +-
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/leak_ptr.c |  10 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/verifier/meta_access.c      |   4 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c |   3 +-
 .../bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c          |   2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/xadd.c   |  18 +-
 44 files changed, 1461 insertions(+), 212 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/atomics.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/atomics.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_and.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_fetch_add.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_or.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_xchg.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_xor.c

base-commit: 0e12c0271887f1b00b79b7612c1d4f0d3d34e8a8

             reply	other threads:[~2020-12-15 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-15 12:18 Brendan Jackman [this message]
2020-12-15 12:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/11] bpf: x86: Factor out emission of ModR/M for *(reg + off) Brendan Jackman
2020-12-15 12:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2] libbpf: Expose libbpf ringbufer epoll_fd Brendan Jackman
2020-12-15 18:35   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-12-15 12:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 02/11] bpf: x86: Factor out emission of REX byte Brendan Jackman
2020-12-15 12:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 03/11] bpf: x86: Factor out a lookup table for some ALU opcodes Brendan Jackman
2020-12-15 12:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 04/11] bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other atomics in .imm Brendan Jackman
2020-12-15 14:05   ` Björn Töpel
2020-12-15 12:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/11] bpf: Move BPF_STX reserved field check into BPF_STX verifier code Brendan Jackman
2020-12-15 12:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 06/11] bpf: Add BPF_FETCH field / create atomic_fetch_add instruction Brendan Jackman
2020-12-15 12:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/11] bpf: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg Brendan Jackman
2020-12-16  6:47   ` Yonghong Song
2020-12-15 12:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/11] bpf: Pull out a macro for interpreting atomic ALU operations Brendan Jackman
2020-12-15 12:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/11] bpf: Add bitwise atomic instructions Brendan Jackman
2020-12-16  6:53   ` Yonghong Song
2020-12-15 12:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 10/11] bpf: Add tests for new BPF atomic operations Brendan Jackman
2020-12-15 12:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 11/11] bpf: Document new atomic instructions Brendan Jackman
2020-12-16  7:08   ` Yonghong Song
2020-12-16 11:44     ` Brendan Jackman
2020-12-16 15:25       ` Yonghong Song
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-12-07 16:07 [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/11] Atomics for eBPF Brendan Jackman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201215121816.1048557-1-jackmanb@google.com \
    --to=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=revest@chromium.org \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).