> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 04:06:20PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > > On 12/15/20 2:47 PM, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c > > > > > > index 329397c60d84..61d3f5f8b7f3 100644 > > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c > > > > > > @@ -866,10 +866,8 @@ static u32 xennet_run_xdp(struct netfront_queue *queue, struct page *pdata, > > > > > > xdp_init_buff(xdp, XEN_PAGE_SIZE - XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM, > > > > > > &queue->xdp_rxq); > > > > > > - xdp->data_hard_start = page_address(pdata); > > > > > > - xdp->data = xdp->data_hard_start + XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM; > > > > > > + xdp_prepare_buff(xdp, page_address(pdata), XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM, len); > > > > > > xdp_set_data_meta_invalid(xdp); > > > > > > - xdp->data_end = xdp->data + len; > > > > > > act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(prog, xdp); > > > > > > switch (act) { > > > > > > diff --git a/include/net/xdp.h b/include/net/xdp.h > > > > > > index 3fb3a9aa1b71..66d8a4b317a3 100644 > > > > > > --- a/include/net/xdp.h > > > > > > +++ b/include/net/xdp.h > > > > > > @@ -83,6 +83,18 @@ xdp_init_buff(struct xdp_buff *xdp, u32 frame_sz, struct xdp_rxq_info *rxq) > > > > > > xdp->rxq = rxq; > > > > > > } > > > > > > +static inline void > > > > > > nit: maybe __always_inline > > > > ack, I will add in v4 > > > > > > > > > > > +xdp_prepare_buff(struct xdp_buff *xdp, unsigned char *hard_start, > > > > > > + int headroom, int data_len) > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > + unsigned char *data = hard_start + headroom; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + xdp->data_hard_start = hard_start; > > > > > > + xdp->data = data; > > > > > > + xdp->data_end = data + data_len; > > > > > > + xdp->data_meta = data; > > > > > > +} > > > > > > + > > > > > > /* Reserve memory area at end-of data area. > > > > > > * > > > > > > For the drivers with xdp_set_data_meta_invalid(), we're basically setting xdp->data_meta > > > twice unless compiler is smart enough to optimize the first one away (did you double check?). > > > Given this is supposed to be a cleanup, why not integrate this logic as well so the > > > xdp_set_data_meta_invalid() doesn't get extra treatment? > > That's what I was trying to say previously. > > > > > we discussed it before, but I am fine to add it in v4. Something like: > > > > static __always_inline void > > xdp_prepare_buff(struct xdp_buff *xdp, unsigned char *hard_start, > > int headroom, int data_len, bool meta_valid) > > { > > unsigned char *data = hard_start + headroom; > > > > xdp->data_hard_start = hard_start; > > xdp->data = data; > > xdp->data_end = data + data_len; > > xdp->data_meta = meta_valid ? data : data + 1; > > This will introduce branch, so for intel drivers we're getting the > overhead of one add and a branch. I'm still opting for a separate helper. > > static __always_inline void > xdp_prepare_buff(struct xdp_buff *xdp, unsigned char *hard_start, > int headroom, int data_len) > { > unsigned char *data = hard_start + headroom; > > xdp->data_hard_start = hard_start; > xdp->data = data; > xdp->data_end = data + data_len; > xdp_set_data_meta_invalid(xdp); > } > > static __always_inline void > xdp_prepare_buff_meta(struct xdp_buff *xdp, unsigned char *hard_start, > int headroom, int data_len) > { > unsigned char *data = hard_start + headroom; > > xdp->data_hard_start = hard_start; > xdp->data = data; > xdp->data_end = data + data_len; > xdp->data_meta = data; > } yes, to follow-up the possible approaches we have here are: - have 2 different helpers (xdp_prepare_buff_meta and xdp_prepare_buff) as suggested by Maciej - move the data_meta initialization out of the helper and do it in each driver - use the current approach and overwrite data_meta with xdp_set_data_meta_invalid() when necessary - introduce a branch in order to have just one helper what is the best for you? Regards, Lorenzo > > > } > > > > Regards, > > Lorenzo > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Daniel > > > > >