BPF Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>,
	"KP Singh" <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
	"Florent Revest" <revest@chromium.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
	"Brendan Jackman" <jackmanb@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/11] bpf: Move BPF_STX reserved field check into BPF_STX verifier code
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 18:17:45 +0000
Message-ID: <20210114181751.768687-6-jackmanb@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210114181751.768687-1-jackmanb@google.com>

I can't find a reason why this code is in resolve_pseudo_ldimm64;
since I'll be modifying it in a subsequent commit, tidy it up.

Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index cfc137b81ac6..d8a85f4e5b95 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -9528,6 +9528,12 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		} else if (class == BPF_STX) {
 			enum bpf_reg_type *prev_dst_type, dst_reg_type;
 
+			if (((BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM &&
+			      BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_ATOMIC) || insn->imm != 0)) {
+				verbose(env, "BPF_STX uses reserved fields\n");
+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
+
 			if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC) {
 				err = check_atomic(env, env->insn_idx, insn);
 				if (err)
@@ -10012,13 +10018,6 @@ static int resolve_pseudo_ldimm64(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
-		if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_STX &&
-		    ((BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM &&
-		      BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_ATOMIC) || insn->imm != 0)) {
-			verbose(env, "BPF_STX uses reserved fields\n");
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-
 		if (insn[0].code == (BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW)) {
 			struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux;
 			struct bpf_map *map;
-- 
2.30.0.284.gd98b1dd5eaa7-goog


  parent reply index

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-14 18:17 [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/11] Atomics for eBPF Brendan Jackman
2021-01-14 18:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 01/11] bpf: x86: Factor out emission of ModR/M for *(reg + off) Brendan Jackman
2021-01-14 18:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 02/11] bpf: x86: Factor out emission of REX byte Brendan Jackman
2021-01-14 18:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/11] bpf: x86: Factor out a lookup table for some ALU opcodes Brendan Jackman
2021-01-14 18:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 04/11] bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other atomics in .imm Brendan Jackman
2021-01-14 18:17 ` Brendan Jackman [this message]
2021-01-14 18:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 06/11] bpf: Add BPF_FETCH field / create atomic_fetch_add instruction Brendan Jackman
2021-01-14 18:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/11] bpf: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg Brendan Jackman
2021-01-14 18:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/11] bpf: Pull out a macro for interpreting atomic ALU operations Brendan Jackman
2021-01-14 18:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 09/11] bpf: Add bitwise atomic instructions Brendan Jackman
2021-01-14 18:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 10/11] bpf: Add tests for new BPF atomic operations Brendan Jackman
2021-01-14 18:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 11/11] bpf: Document new atomic instructions Brendan Jackman
2021-01-15  3:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/11] Atomics for eBPF patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2021-01-15  3:23 ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210114181751.768687-6-jackmanb@google.com \
    --to=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=revest@chromium.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

BPF Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/0 bpf/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 bpf bpf/ https://lore.kernel.org/bpf \
		bpf@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index bpf

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.bpf


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git