From: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>, Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@chromium.org> Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf/selftests: Update the IMA test to use BPF ring buffer Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 19:36:22 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210204193622.3367275-3-kpsingh@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210204193622.3367275-1-kpsingh@kernel.org> Instead of using shared global variables between userspace and BPF, use the ring buffer to send the IMA hash on the BPF ring buffer. This helps in validating both IMA and the usage of the ringbuffer in sleepable programs. Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c | 23 ++++++++++--- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/ima.c | 33 ++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c index 61fca681d524..b54bc0c351b7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #include <test_progs.h> +#include <linux/ring_buffer.h> #include "ima.skel.h" @@ -31,9 +32,18 @@ static int run_measured_process(const char *measured_dir, u32 *monitored_pid) return -EINVAL; } +static u64 ima_hash_from_bpf; + +static int process_sample(void *ctx, void *data, size_t len) +{ + ima_hash_from_bpf = *((u64 *)data); + return 0; +} + void test_test_ima(void) { char measured_dir_template[] = "/tmp/ima_measuredXXXXXX"; + struct ring_buffer *ringbuf; const char *measured_dir; char cmd[256]; @@ -44,6 +54,11 @@ void test_test_ima(void) if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_load", "skeleton failed\n")) goto close_prog; + ringbuf = ring_buffer__new(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.ringbuf), + process_sample, NULL, NULL); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(ringbuf, "ringbuf")) + goto close_prog; + err = ima__attach(skel); if (CHECK(err, "attach", "attach failed: %d\n", err)) goto close_prog; @@ -60,11 +75,9 @@ void test_test_ima(void) if (CHECK(err, "run_measured_process", "err = %d\n", err)) goto close_clean; - CHECK(skel->data->ima_hash_ret < 0, "ima_hash_ret", - "ima_hash_ret = %ld\n", skel->data->ima_hash_ret); - - CHECK(skel->bss->ima_hash == 0, "ima_hash", - "ima_hash = %lu\n", skel->bss->ima_hash); + err = ring_buffer__consume(ringbuf); + ASSERT_EQ(err, 1, "num_samples_or_err"); + ASSERT_NEQ(ima_hash_from_bpf, 0, "ima_hash"); close_clean: snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd), "./ima_setup.sh cleanup %s", measured_dir); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/ima.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/ima.c index 86b21aff4bc5..96060ff4ffc6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/ima.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/ima.c @@ -9,20 +9,37 @@ #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> #include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h> -long ima_hash_ret = -1; -u64 ima_hash = 0; u32 monitored_pid = 0; +struct { + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF); + __uint(max_entries, 1 << 12); +} ringbuf SEC(".maps"); + char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; SEC("lsm.s/bprm_committed_creds") -int BPF_PROG(ima, struct linux_binprm *bprm) +void BPF_PROG(ima, struct linux_binprm *bprm) { - u32 pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32; + u64 ima_hash = 0; + u64 *sample; + int ret; + u32 pid; + + pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32; + if (pid == monitored_pid) { + ret = bpf_ima_inode_hash(bprm->file->f_inode, &ima_hash, + sizeof(ima_hash)); + if (ret < 0 || ima_hash == 0) + return; + + sample = bpf_ringbuf_reserve(&ringbuf, sizeof(u64), 0); + if (!sample) + return; - if (pid == monitored_pid) - ima_hash_ret = bpf_ima_inode_hash(bprm->file->f_inode, - &ima_hash, sizeof(ima_hash)); + *sample = ima_hash; + bpf_ringbuf_submit(sample, 0); + } - return 0; + return; } -- 2.30.0.365.g02bc693789-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-04 19:37 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-02-04 19:36 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] BPF Ringbuffer + Sleepable Programs KP Singh 2021-02-04 19:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: Allow usage of BPF ringbuffer in sleepable programs KP Singh 2021-02-04 20:57 ` Song Liu 2021-02-05 1:15 ` Andrii Nakryiko 2021-02-04 19:36 ` KP Singh [this message] 2021-02-05 7:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] BPF Ringbuffer + Sleepable Programs Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210204193622.3367275-3-kpsingh@kernel.org \ --to=kpsingh@kernel.org \ --cc=andrii@kernel.org \ --cc=ast@kernel.org \ --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \ --cc=jackmanb@chromium.org \ --cc=revest@chromium.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf/selftests: Update the IMA test to use BPF ring buffer' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).