From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
magnus.karlsson@intel.com, bjorn@kernel.org,
weqaar.a.janjua@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] selftests/bpf: restructure xsk selftests
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 12:23:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210222112334.GA29106@ranger.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210217160214.7869-4-ciara.loftus@intel.com>
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 04:02:13PM +0000, Ciara Loftus wrote:
> Prior to this commit individual xsk tests were launched from the
> shell script 'test_xsk.sh'. When adding a new test type, two new test
> configurations had to be added to this file - one for each of the
> supported XDP 'modes' (skb or drv). Should zero copy support be added to
> the xsk selftest framework in the future, three new test configurations
> would need to be added for each new test type. Each new test type also
> typically requires new CLI arguments for the xdpxceiver program.
>
> This commit aims to reduce the overhead of adding new tests, by launching
> the test configurations from within the xdpxceiver program itself, using
> simple loops. Every test is run every time the C program is executed. Many
> of the CLI arguments can be removed as a result.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xsk.sh | 112 +-----------
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c | 199 ++++++++++++---------
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.h | 27 ++-
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xsk_prereqs.sh | 24 +--
> 4 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 223 deletions(-)
>
Good cleanup! I have a series of fixes/cleanups as well and I need to
introduce a new test over here, so your work makes it easier for me.
One nit below and once you address Bjorn's request, then feel free to add
my:
Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
[...]
> +static int configure_skb(void)
> +{
> +
> + char cmd[80];
> +
> + snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd), "ip link set dev %s xdpdrv off", ifdict[0]->ifname);
> + if (system(cmd)) {
> + ksft_test_result_fail("Failed to configure native mode on iface %s\n",
> + ifdict[0]->ifname);
> + return -1;
> + }
> + snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd), "ip netns exec %s ip link set dev %s xdpdrv off",
> + ifdict[1]->nsname, ifdict[1]->ifname);
> + if (system(cmd)) {
> + ksft_test_result_fail("Failed to configure native mode on iface/ns %s\n",
> + ifdict[1]->ifname, ifdict[1]->nsname);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + cur_mode = TEST_MODE_SKB;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +}
> +
> +static int configure_drv(void)
> +{
> + char cmd[80];
> +
> + snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd), "ip link set dev %s xdpgeneric off", ifdict[0]->ifname);
> + if (system(cmd)) {
> + ksft_test_result_fail("Failed to configure native mode on iface %s\n",
> + ifdict[0]->ifname);
> + return -1;
> + }
> + snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd), "ip netns exec %s ip link set dev %s xdpgeneric off",
> + ifdict[1]->nsname, ifdict[1]->ifname);
> + if (system(cmd)) {
> + ksft_test_result_fail("Failed to configure native mode on iface/ns %s\n",
> + ifdict[1]->ifname, ifdict[1]->nsname);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + cur_mode = TEST_MODE_DRV;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void run_pkt_test(int mode, int type)
> +{
> + test_type = type;
> +
> + /* reset defaults after potential previous test */
> + xdp_flags = XDP_FLAGS_UPDATE_IF_NOEXIST;
> + pkt_counter = 0;
> + switching_notify = 0;
> + bidi_pass = 0;
> + prev_pkt = -1;
> + ifdict[0]->fv.vector = tx;
> + ifdict[1]->fv.vector = rx;
> +
> + switch (mode) {
> + case (TEST_MODE_SKB):
> + if (cur_mode != TEST_MODE_SKB)
> + configure_skb();
Should you check a return value over here?
> + xdp_flags |= XDP_FLAGS_SKB_MODE;
> + uut = TEST_MODE_SKB;
> + break;
> + case (TEST_MODE_DRV):
> + if (cur_mode != TEST_MODE_DRV)
> + configure_drv();
ditto
> + xdp_flags |= XDP_FLAGS_DRV_MODE;
> + uut = TEST_MODE_DRV;
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + pthread_init_mutex();
> +
> + if ((test_type != TEST_TYPE_TEARDOWN) && (test_type != TEST_TYPE_BIDI))
> + testapp_validate();
> + else
> + testapp_sockets();
> +
> + pthread_destroy_mutex();
> +}
> +
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> struct rlimit _rlim = { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY };
> @@ -1021,6 +1062,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> const char *IP2 = "192.168.100.161";
> u16 UDP_DST_PORT = 2020;
> u16 UDP_SRC_PORT = 2121;
> + int i, j;
>
> ifaceconfig = malloc(sizeof(struct ifaceconfigobj));
> memcpy(ifaceconfig->dst_mac, MAC1, ETH_ALEN);
> @@ -1046,24 +1088,19 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>
> init_iface_config(ifaceconfig);
>
> - pthread_init_mutex();
> + ksft_set_plan(TEST_MODE_MAX * TEST_TYPE_MAX);
>
> - ksft_set_plan(1);
> + configure_skb();
> + cur_mode = TEST_MODE_SKB;
>
> - if (!opt_teardown && !opt_bidi) {
> - testapp_validate();
> - } else if (opt_teardown && opt_bidi) {
> - ksft_test_result_fail("ERROR: parameters -T and -B cannot be used together\n");
> - ksft_exit_xfail();
> - } else {
> - testapp_sockets();
> + for (i = 0; i < TEST_MODE_MAX; i++) {
> + for (j = 0; j < TEST_TYPE_MAX; j++)
> + run_pkt_test(i, j);
> }
>
> for (int i = 0; i < MAX_INTERFACES; i++)
> free(ifdict[i]);
>
> - pthread_destroy_mutex();
> -
> ksft_exit_pass();
>
> return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-22 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-17 16:02 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] selftests/bpf: xsk improvements and new stats tests Ciara Loftus
2021-02-17 16:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] selftest/bpf: make xsk tests less verbose Ciara Loftus
2021-02-22 11:58 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-02-17 16:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: expose debug arg to shell script for xsk tests Ciara Loftus
2021-02-19 13:12 ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-02-22 14:29 ` Loftus, Ciara
2021-02-17 16:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] selftests/bpf: restructure xsk selftests Ciara Loftus
2021-02-18 9:33 ` Björn Töpel
2021-02-22 11:23 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2021-02-23 8:24 ` Loftus, Ciara
2021-02-17 16:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: introduce xsk statistics tests Ciara Loftus
2021-02-22 11:56 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-02-22 14:33 ` Loftus, Ciara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210222112334.GA29106@ranger.igk.intel.com \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=weqaar.a.janjua@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).