bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 11/12] selftests/bpf: add hashmap test for bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 12:49:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210226204933.3885657-1-yhs@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210226204920.3884074-1-yhs@fb.com>

A test case is added for hashmap and percpu hashmap. The test
also exercises nested bpf_for_each_map_elem() calls like
    bpf_prog:
      bpf_for_each_map_elem(func1)
    func1:
      bpf_for_each_map_elem(func2)
    func2:

  $ ./test_progs -n 45
  #45/1 hash_map:OK
  #45 for_each:OK
  Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/for_each.c       | 73 ++++++++++++++
 .../bpf/progs/for_each_hash_map_elem.c        | 95 +++++++++++++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h      | 11 +++
 3 files changed, 179 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/for_each.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/for_each_hash_map_elem.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/for_each.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/for_each.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..aa847cd9f71f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/for_each.c
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2021 Facebook */
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <network_helpers.h>
+#include "for_each_hash_map_elem.skel.h"
+
+static unsigned int duration;
+
+static void test_hash_map(void)
+{
+	int i, err, hashmap_fd, max_entries, percpu_map_fd;
+	struct for_each_hash_map_elem *skel;
+	__u64 *percpu_valbuf = NULL;
+	__u32 key, num_cpus, retval;
+	__u64 val;
+
+	skel = for_each_hash_map_elem__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "for_each_hash_map_elem__open_and_load"))
+		return;
+
+	hashmap_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.hashmap);
+	max_entries = bpf_map__max_entries(skel->maps.hashmap);
+	for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) {
+		key = i;
+		val = i + 1;
+		err = bpf_map_update_elem(hashmap_fd, &key, &val, BPF_ANY);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "map_update"))
+			goto out;
+	}
+
+	num_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus();
+	percpu_map_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.percpu_map);
+	percpu_valbuf = malloc(sizeof(__u64) * num_cpus);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(percpu_valbuf, "percpu_valbuf"))
+		goto out;
+
+	key = 1;
+	for (i = 0; i < num_cpus; i++)
+		percpu_valbuf[i] = i + 1;
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(percpu_map_fd, &key, percpu_valbuf, BPF_ANY);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "percpu_map_update"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_pkt_access),
+				1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), NULL, NULL,
+				&retval, &duration);
+	if (CHECK(err || retval, "ipv4", "err %d errno %d retval %d\n",
+		  err, errno, retval))
+		goto out;
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->hashmap_output, 4, "hashmap_output");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->hashmap_elems, max_entries, "hashmap_elems");
+
+	key = 1;
+	err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(hashmap_fd, &key, &val);
+	ASSERT_ERR(err, "hashmap_lookup");
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_called, 1, "percpu_called");
+	ASSERT_LT(skel->bss->cpu, num_cpus, "num_cpus");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_map_elems, 1, "percpu_map_elems");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_key, 1, "percpu_key");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_val, skel->bss->cpu + 1, "percpu_val");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_output, 100, "percpu_output");
+out:
+	free(percpu_valbuf);
+	for_each_hash_map_elem__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+void test_for_each(void)
+{
+	if (test__start_subtest("hash_map"))
+		test_hash_map();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/for_each_hash_map_elem.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/for_each_hash_map_elem.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..913dd91aafff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/for_each_hash_map_elem.c
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2021 Facebook */
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+	__uint(max_entries, 3);
+	__type(key, __u32);
+	__type(value, __u64);
+} hashmap SEC(".maps");
+
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH);
+	__uint(max_entries, 1);
+	__type(key, __u32);
+	__type(value, __u64);
+} percpu_map SEC(".maps");
+
+struct callback_ctx {
+	struct __sk_buff *ctx;
+	int input;
+	int output;
+};
+
+static __u64
+check_hash_elem(struct bpf_map *map, __u32 *key, __u64 *val,
+		struct callback_ctx *data)
+{
+	struct __sk_buff *skb = data->ctx;
+	__u32 k;
+	__u64 v;
+
+	if (skb) {
+		k = *key;
+		v = *val;
+		if (skb->len == 10000 && k == 10 && v == 10)
+			data->output = 3; /* impossible path */
+		else
+			data->output = 4;
+	} else {
+		data->output = data->input;
+		bpf_map_delete_elem(map, key);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+__u32 cpu = 0;
+__u32 percpu_called = 0;
+__u32 percpu_key = 0;
+__u64 percpu_val = 0;
+int percpu_output = 0;
+
+static __u64
+check_percpu_elem(struct bpf_map *map, __u32 *key, __u64 *val,
+		  struct callback_ctx *unused)
+{
+	struct callback_ctx data;
+
+	percpu_called++;
+	cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
+	percpu_key = *key;
+	percpu_val = *val;
+
+	data.ctx = 0;
+	data.input = 100;
+	data.output = 0;
+	bpf_for_each_map_elem(&hashmap, check_hash_elem, &data, 0);
+	percpu_output = data.output;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int hashmap_output = 0;
+int hashmap_elems = 0;
+int percpu_map_elems = 0;
+
+SEC("classifier")
+int test_pkt_access(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	struct callback_ctx data;
+
+	data.ctx = skb;
+	data.input = 10;
+	data.output = 0;
+	hashmap_elems = bpf_for_each_map_elem(&hashmap, check_hash_elem, &data, 0);
+	hashmap_output = data.output;
+
+	percpu_map_elems = bpf_for_each_map_elem(&percpu_map, check_percpu_elem,
+						 (void *)0, 0);
+	return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
index f7c2fd89d01a..e87c8546230e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
@@ -152,6 +152,17 @@ extern int test__join_cgroup(const char *path);
 	___ok;								\
 })
 
+#define ASSERT_LT(actual, expected, name) ({				\
+	static int duration = 0;					\
+	typeof(actual) ___act = (actual);				\
+	typeof(expected) ___exp = (expected);				\
+	bool ___ok = ___act < ___exp;					\
+	CHECK(!___ok, (name),						\
+	      "unexpected %s: actual %lld >= expected %lld\n",		\
+	      (name), (long long)(___act), (long long)(___exp));	\
+	___ok;								\
+})
+
 #define ASSERT_STREQ(actual, expected, name) ({				\
 	static int duration = 0;					\
 	const char *___act = actual;					\
-- 
2.24.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-26 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-26 20:49 [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/12] bpf: add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/12] bpf: factor out visit_func_call_insn() in check_cfg() Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 02/12] bpf: factor out verbose_invalid_scalar() Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 03/12] bpf: refactor check_func_call() to allow callback function Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 04/12] bpf: change return value of verifier function add_subprog() Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/12] bpf: add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 21:29   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 06/12] bpf: add hashtab support for " Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/12] bpf: add arraymap " Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/12] libbpf: move function is_ldimm64() earlier in libbpf.c Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/12] libbpf: support subprog address relocation Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 10/12] bpftool: print subprog address properly Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 12/12] selftests/bpf: add arraymap test for bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210226204933.3885657-1-yhs@fb.com \
    --to=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).