From: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org Cc: kernel-team@cloudflare.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/5] bpf: consolidate shared test timing code Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 10:18:12 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210303101816.36774-2-lmb@cloudflare.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210303101816.36774-1-lmb@cloudflare.com> Share the timing / signal interruption logic between different implementations of PROG_TEST_RUN. There is a change in behaviour as well. We check the loop exit condition before checking for pending signals. This resolves an edge case where a signal arrives during the last iteration. Instead of aborting with EINTR we return the successful result to user space. Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> --- net/bpf/test_run.c | 141 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c index 58bcb8c849d5..eb3c78cd4d7c 100644 --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c @@ -16,14 +16,78 @@ #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS #include <trace/events/bpf_test_run.h> +struct bpf_test_timer { + enum { NO_PREEMPT, NO_MIGRATE } mode; + u32 i; + u64 time_start, time_spent; +}; + +static void bpf_test_timer_enter(struct bpf_test_timer *t) + __acquires(rcu) +{ + rcu_read_lock(); + if (t->mode == NO_PREEMPT) + preempt_disable(); + else + migrate_disable(); + + t->time_start = ktime_get_ns(); +} + +static void bpf_test_timer_leave(struct bpf_test_timer *t) + __releases(rcu) +{ + t->time_start = 0; + + if (t->mode == NO_PREEMPT) + preempt_enable(); + else + migrate_enable(); + rcu_read_unlock(); +} + +static bool bpf_test_timer_continue(struct bpf_test_timer *t, u32 repeat, int *err, u32 *duration) + __must_hold(rcu) +{ + t->i++; + if (t->i >= repeat) { + /* We're done. */ + t->time_spent += ktime_get_ns() - t->time_start; + do_div(t->time_spent, t->i); + *duration = t->time_spent > U32_MAX ? U32_MAX : (u32)t->time_spent; + *err = 0; + goto reset; + } + + if (signal_pending(current)) { + /* During iteration: we've been cancelled, abort. */ + *err = -EINTR; + goto reset; + } + + if (need_resched()) { + /* During iteration: we need to reschedule between runs. */ + t->time_spent += ktime_get_ns() - t->time_start; + bpf_test_timer_leave(t); + cond_resched(); + bpf_test_timer_enter(t); + } + + /* Do another round. */ + return true; + +reset: + t->i = 0; + return false; +} + static int bpf_test_run(struct bpf_prog *prog, void *ctx, u32 repeat, u32 *retval, u32 *time, bool xdp) { struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage[MAX_BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_TYPE] = { NULL }; + struct bpf_test_timer t = { NO_MIGRATE }; enum bpf_cgroup_storage_type stype; - u64 time_start, time_spent = 0; - int ret = 0; - u32 i; + int ret; for_each_cgroup_storage_type(stype) { storage[stype] = bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(prog, stype); @@ -38,40 +102,16 @@ static int bpf_test_run(struct bpf_prog *prog, void *ctx, u32 repeat, if (!repeat) repeat = 1; - rcu_read_lock(); - migrate_disable(); - time_start = ktime_get_ns(); - for (i = 0; i < repeat; i++) { + bpf_test_timer_enter(&t); + do { bpf_cgroup_storage_set(storage); if (xdp) *retval = bpf_prog_run_xdp(prog, ctx); else *retval = BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, ctx); - - if (signal_pending(current)) { - ret = -EINTR; - break; - } - - if (need_resched()) { - time_spent += ktime_get_ns() - time_start; - migrate_enable(); - rcu_read_unlock(); - - cond_resched(); - - rcu_read_lock(); - migrate_disable(); - time_start = ktime_get_ns(); - } - } - time_spent += ktime_get_ns() - time_start; - migrate_enable(); - rcu_read_unlock(); - - do_div(time_spent, repeat); - *time = time_spent > U32_MAX ? U32_MAX : (u32)time_spent; + } while (bpf_test_timer_continue(&t, repeat, &ret, time)); + bpf_test_timer_leave(&t); for_each_cgroup_storage_type(stype) bpf_cgroup_storage_free(storage[stype]); @@ -674,18 +714,17 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr) { + struct bpf_test_timer t = { NO_PREEMPT }; u32 size = kattr->test.data_size_in; struct bpf_flow_dissector ctx = {}; u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat; struct bpf_flow_keys *user_ctx; struct bpf_flow_keys flow_keys; - u64 time_start, time_spent = 0; const struct ethhdr *eth; unsigned int flags = 0; u32 retval, duration; void *data; int ret; - u32 i; if (prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR) return -EINVAL; @@ -721,39 +760,15 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector(struct bpf_prog *prog, ctx.data = data; ctx.data_end = (__u8 *)data + size; - rcu_read_lock(); - preempt_disable(); - time_start = ktime_get_ns(); - for (i = 0; i < repeat; i++) { + bpf_test_timer_enter(&t); + do { retval = bpf_flow_dissect(prog, &ctx, eth->h_proto, ETH_HLEN, size, flags); + } while (bpf_test_timer_continue(&t, repeat, &ret, &duration)); + bpf_test_timer_leave(&t); - if (signal_pending(current)) { - preempt_enable(); - rcu_read_unlock(); - - ret = -EINTR; - goto out; - } - - if (need_resched()) { - time_spent += ktime_get_ns() - time_start; - preempt_enable(); - rcu_read_unlock(); - - cond_resched(); - - rcu_read_lock(); - preempt_disable(); - time_start = ktime_get_ns(); - } - } - time_spent += ktime_get_ns() - time_start; - preempt_enable(); - rcu_read_unlock(); - - do_div(time_spent, repeat); - duration = time_spent > U32_MAX ? U32_MAX : (u32)time_spent; + if (ret < 0) + goto out; ret = bpf_test_finish(kattr, uattr, &flow_keys, sizeof(flow_keys), retval, duration); -- 2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-03 22:56 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-03-03 10:18 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/5] PROG_TEST_RUN support for sk_lookup programs Lorenz Bauer 2021-03-03 10:18 ` Lorenz Bauer [this message] 2021-03-04 18:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/5] bpf: consolidate shared test timing code Andrii Nakryiko 2021-03-03 10:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/5] bpf: add PROG_TEST_RUN support for sk_lookup programs Lorenz Bauer 2021-03-03 10:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/5] selftests: bpf: convert sk_lookup ctx access tests to PROG_TEST_RUN Lorenz Bauer 2021-03-03 10:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/5] selftests: bpf: check that PROG_TEST_RUN repeats as requested Lorenz Bauer 2021-03-03 10:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/5] selftests: bpf: don't run sk_lookup in verifier tests Lorenz Bauer 2021-03-05 3:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/5] PROG_TEST_RUN support for sk_lookup programs Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210303101816.36774-2-lmb@cloudflare.com \ --to=lmb@cloudflare.com \ --cc=andrii@kernel.org \ --cc=ast@kernel.org \ --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \ --cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/5] bpf: consolidate shared test timing code' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).