bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: bjorn.topel@intel.com, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
	ciara.loftus@intel.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	toke@redhat.com,
	Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 10/17] selftests: xsk: remove Tx synchronization resources
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:43:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210329224316.17793-11-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210329224316.17793-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>

Tx thread needs to be started after the Rx side is fully initialized so
that packets are not xmitted until xsk Rx socket is ready to be used.

It can be observed that atomic variable spinning_tx is not checked from
Rx side in any way, so thread_common_ops can be modified to only address
the spinning_rx. This means that spinning_tx can be removed altogheter.

signal_tx_condition is never utilized, so simply remove it.

Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c | 15 +++++++--------
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.h |  2 --
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
index b6fd5eb1d620..3db221e548cc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
@@ -126,7 +126,6 @@ static void pthread_init_mutex(void)
 	pthread_mutex_init(&sync_mutex, NULL);
 	pthread_mutex_init(&sync_mutex_tx, NULL);
 	pthread_cond_init(&signal_rx_condition, NULL);
-	pthread_cond_init(&signal_tx_condition, NULL);
 }
 
 static void pthread_destroy_mutex(void)
@@ -134,7 +133,6 @@ static void pthread_destroy_mutex(void)
 	pthread_mutex_destroy(&sync_mutex);
 	pthread_mutex_destroy(&sync_mutex_tx);
 	pthread_cond_destroy(&signal_rx_condition);
-	pthread_cond_destroy(&signal_tx_condition);
 }
 
 static void *memset32_htonl(void *dest, u32 val, u32 size)
@@ -754,8 +752,7 @@ static void worker_pkt_validate(void)
 	}
 }
 
-static void thread_common_ops(struct ifobject *ifobject, void *bufs, pthread_mutex_t *mutexptr,
-			      atomic_int *spinningptr)
+static void thread_common_ops(struct ifobject *ifobject, void *bufs, pthread_mutex_t *mutexptr)
 {
 	int ctr = 0;
 	int ret;
@@ -780,13 +777,15 @@ static void thread_common_ops(struct ifobject *ifobject, void *bufs, pthread_mut
 	 */
 	pthread_mutex_lock(mutexptr);
 	while (ret && ctr < SOCK_RECONF_CTR) {
-		atomic_store(spinningptr, 1);
+		if (ifobject->fv.vector == rx)
+			atomic_store(&spinning_rx, 1);
 		xsk_configure_umem(ifobject, bufs, num_frames * XSK_UMEM__DEFAULT_FRAME_SIZE);
 		ret = xsk_configure_socket(ifobject);
 		usleep(USLEEP_MAX);
 		ctr++;
 	}
-	atomic_store(spinningptr, 0);
+	if (ifobject->fv.vector == rx)
+		atomic_store(&spinning_rx, 0);
 	pthread_mutex_unlock(mutexptr);
 
 	if (ctr >= SOCK_RECONF_CTR)
@@ -808,7 +807,7 @@ static void *worker_testapp_validate_tx(void *arg)
 	void *bufs = NULL;
 
 	if (!bidi_pass)
-		thread_common_ops(ifobject, bufs, &sync_mutex_tx, &spinning_tx);
+		thread_common_ops(ifobject, bufs, &sync_mutex_tx);
 
 	while (atomic_load(&spinning_rx) && spinningrxctr < SOCK_RECONF_CTR) {
 		spinningrxctr++;
@@ -846,7 +845,7 @@ static void *worker_testapp_validate_rx(void *arg)
 	void *bufs = NULL;
 
 	if (!bidi_pass)
-		thread_common_ops(ifobject, bufs, &sync_mutex_tx, &spinning_rx);
+		thread_common_ops(ifobject, bufs, &sync_mutex_tx);
 
 	if (stat_test_type != STAT_TEST_RX_FILL_EMPTY)
 		xsk_populate_fill_ring(ifobject->umem);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.h
index 493f7498d40e..483be41229c6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.h
@@ -144,12 +144,10 @@ struct ifobject {
 static struct ifobject *ifdict[MAX_INTERFACES];
 
 /*threads*/
-atomic_int spinning_tx;
 atomic_int spinning_rx;
 pthread_mutex_t sync_mutex;
 pthread_mutex_t sync_mutex_tx;
 pthread_cond_t signal_rx_condition;
-pthread_cond_t signal_tx_condition;
 pthread_t t0, t1;
 pthread_attr_t attr;
 
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-29 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-29 22:42 [PATCH v5 bpf-next 00/17] AF_XDP selftests improvements & bpf_link Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 01/17] selftests: xsk: don't call worker_pkt_dump() for stats test Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 02/17] selftests: xsk: remove struct ifaceconfigobj Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 03/17] selftests: xsk: remove unused function Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 04/17] selftests: xsk: remove inline keyword from source file Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 05/17] selftests: xsk: simplify frame traversal in dumping thread Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 06/17] libbpf: xsk: use bpf_link Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-31 13:10   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 07/17] samples: bpf: do not unload prog within xdpsock Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 08/17] selftests: xsk: remove thread for netns switch Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 09/17] selftests: xsk: split worker thread Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 11/17] selftests: xsk: refactor teardown/bidi test cases and testapp_validate Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 12/17] selftests: xsk: remove sync_mutex_tx and atomic var Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 13/17] veth: implement ethtool's get_channels() callback Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 14/17] selftests: xsk: implement bpf_link test Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 15/17] selftests: xsk: remove thread attribute Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 16/17] selftests: xsk: Remove mutex and condition variable Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 17/17] selftests: xsk: Remove unused defines Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-30 16:34 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 00/17] AF_XDP selftests improvements & bpf_link Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210329224316.17793-11-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 10/17] selftests: xsk: remove Tx synchronization resources' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).