bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, kuba@kernel.org, bjorn@kernel.org,
Subject: Re: [PATCH intel-next 2/2] ice: introduce XDP Tx fallback path
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:12:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210608121259.GA1971@ranger.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87czt5dal0.fsf@toke.dk>

On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 02:38:03PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> writes:
> > Under rare circumstances there might be a situation where a requirement
> > of having a XDP Tx queue per core could not be fulfilled and some of the
> > Tx resources would have to be shared between cores. This yields a need
> > for placing accesses to xdp_rings array onto critical section protected
> > by spinlock.
> >
> > Design of handling such scenario is to at first find out how many queues
> > are there that XDP could use. Any number that is not less than the half
> > of a count of cores of platform is allowed. XDP queue count < cpu count
> > is signalled via new VSI state ICE_VSI_XDP_FALLBACK which carries the
> > information further down to Rx rings where new ICE_TX_XDP_LOCKED is set
> > based on the mentioned VSI state. This ring flag indicates that locking
> > variants for getting/putting xdp_ring need to be used in fast path.
> >
> > For XDP_REDIRECT the impact on standard case (one XDP ring per CPU) can
> > be reduced a bit by providing a separate ndo_xdp_xmit and swap it at
> > configuration time. However, due to the fact that net_device_ops struct
> > is a const, it is not possible to replace a single ndo, so for the
> > locking variant of ndo_xdp_xmit, whole net_device_ops needs to be
> > replayed.
> >
> > It has an impact on performance (1-2 %) of a non-fallback path as
> > branches are introduced.
> I generally feel this is the right approach, although the performance
> impact is a bit unfortunately, obviously. Maybe it could be avoided by
> the use of static_branch? I.e., keep a global refcount of how many
> netdevs are using the locked path and only activate the check in the
> fast path while that refcount is >0?

This would be an ideal solution if we would be able to have it PF-scoped,
which AFAICT is not possible as static key is per module, right?

I checked that before the bank holiday here in Poland and indeed I was not
observing perf drops. Only thing that is questionable is the fact that a
single PF would affect all the others that ice driver is serving.

OTOH I see that Jesper acked that work.

Let me play with this a bit more as I'm in the middle of switching my HW
lab, but I wanted to break the silence over here. I didn't manage to check
that one fallback path will affect other PFs.

Thanks Toke for that great idea :) any other opinions are more than

> -Toke

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-08 12:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-01 11:32 [PATCH intel-next 0/2] ice: bring up XDP_TX back to life Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-06-01 11:32 ` [PATCH intel-next 1/2] ice: unify xdp_rings accesses Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-06-01 11:32 ` [PATCH intel-next 2/2] ice: introduce XDP Tx fallback path Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-06-01 12:38   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-08 12:12     ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2021-06-08 21:43       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-03  0:52   ` Nguyen, Anthony L
2021-06-08 12:13     ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-06-03  8:42   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210608121259.GA1971@ranger.igk.intel.com \
    --to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).