From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7985C11F67 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 19:21:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3256142B for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 19:21:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234218AbhGATXf (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2021 15:23:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42254 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234219AbhGATXb (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2021 15:23:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x631.google.com (mail-pl1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::631]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D99FBC061765; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 12:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x631.google.com with SMTP id c15so4191974pls.13; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 12:21:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=euC7f1lwJ0DS9gjXPO5ZTl7WLktQXMZwRBwfnY7ZxVk=; b=twaWkp8gTQeZCEh7gXiqbBEplg/dfeS8fH0WLpSWI+dKDOu7JMdJQtmNGJyOVcCUee c9g3PddofIMS3SroHnn/r8HXw+mTFc3qyq9NOOHjgmruHW5Bqipm/X+G1uLy3ojVBQBd V7DdbijfCdelr7ossEP3xN2c5z09yjWfXYMBRiNWFqd5x47hsO2SaqJOLHacqluLRpE0 B7WNGyho4IuhJj6J/JiOM/OlC2Khowfl6oVOmBhWXHd/vLQsmvrvqzGjn60Z0R/+iDUK qBTAFk2lAlf1cnxlb5eCe9vsEkxl4sCwQE5xtjSBmkbS/x7uYSh0lzcn9fg81Gx7K2R4 RaEQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=euC7f1lwJ0DS9gjXPO5ZTl7WLktQXMZwRBwfnY7ZxVk=; b=F2MZKFy60vP2x6p2T4JlhF41R7VRr7cbo13S/zBqyNFErgU/5uW39a5+dBRF0Y3c6q fkvKYjllEGOVwjsC7v9M6M+XuuQ4x0vttT7jipMNvD0yW6kbY/EXQPQImkBmfQzyNxyO GofXaZSON1xFeEmhNtTtVgJGHQA01XOltbDKzBmxkkfKZNndFT8hELnRhF/UnEwOsDMi pATiCUTNaeBtkejOLDgLFSy4Ss41WflFJeCeNczImUTtnt9iitH0/zxu8IaSWhh3/vih rVoHEd0joed9jmKhY4Je1k7X1rO39ZZdd8iHhZXGlSmfF/TZKD4tp+b4Y1i1VQOmQHfL 2uXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530dZmOj8cK+EZKVHzZ9rDuAKdXHo0M/eAn2NggLaFLHSQ8k+8vC ZulzPP9TWM/w9tHc56UWGwOJnWtRexY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwZ6zRQPh9/dX7NwUdBf+pkxirWlsmrKSNxf5lJCXS861gzSkLcueN2RHtiEsOQX7UNUEjRKA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6402:: with SMTP id g2mr1141995pjj.82.1625167260467; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 12:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ast-mbp.thefacebook.com ([2620:10d:c090:400::5:f1f2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w8sm607725pgf.81.2021.07.01.12.20.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Jul 2021 12:21:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Alexei Starovoitov To: davem@davemloft.net Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 7/9] bpf: Teach stack depth check about async callbacks. Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 12:20:42 -0700 Message-Id: <20210701192044.78034-8-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.13.5 In-Reply-To: <20210701192044.78034-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> References: <20210701192044.78034-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org From: Alexei Starovoitov Teach max stack depth checking algorithm about async callbacks that don't increase bpf program stack size. Also add sanity check that bpf_tail_call didn't sneak into async cb. It's impossible, since PTR_TO_CTX is not available in async cb, hence the program cannot contain bpf_tail_call(ctx,...); Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 1 + kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 18 +++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h index 242d0b1a0772..b847e1ccd10f 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h @@ -406,6 +406,7 @@ struct bpf_subprog_info { bool has_tail_call; bool tail_call_reachable; bool has_ld_abs; + bool is_async_cb; }; /* single container for all structs diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 46259d02083f..e3efb48951f0 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -3709,6 +3709,8 @@ static int check_max_stack_depth(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) continue_func: subprog_end = subprog[idx + 1].start; for (; i < subprog_end; i++) { + int next_insn; + if (!bpf_pseudo_call(insn + i) && !bpf_pseudo_func(insn + i)) continue; /* remember insn and function to return to */ @@ -3716,13 +3718,22 @@ static int check_max_stack_depth(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) ret_prog[frame] = idx; /* find the callee */ - i = i + insn[i].imm + 1; - idx = find_subprog(env, i); + next_insn = i + insn[i].imm + 1; + idx = find_subprog(env, next_insn); if (idx < 0) { WARN_ONCE(1, "verifier bug. No program starts at insn %d\n", - i); + next_insn); return -EFAULT; } + if (subprog[idx].is_async_cb) { + if (subprog[idx].has_tail_call) { + verbose(env, "verifier bug. subprog has tail_call and async cb\n"); + return -EFAULT; + } + /* async callbacks don't increase bpf prog stack size */ + continue; + } + i = next_insn; if (subprog[idx].has_tail_call) tail_call_reachable = true; @@ -5761,6 +5772,7 @@ static int __check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn struct bpf_verifier_state *async_cb; /* there is no real recursion here. timer callbacks are async */ + env->subprog_info[subprog].is_async_cb = true; async_cb = push_async_cb(env, env->subprog_info[subprog].start, *insn_idx, subprog); if (!async_cb) -- 2.30.2