From: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
Tony.Ambardar@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Subject: [PATCH] bpf/tests: do not PASS tests without actually testing the result
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 12:38:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210721103822.3755111-1-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> (raw)
Each test case can have a set of sub-tests, where each sub-test can
run the cBPF/eBPF test snippet with its own data_size and expected
result. Before, the end of the sub-test array was indicated by both
data_size and result being zero. However, most or all of the internal
eBPF tests has a data_size of zero already. When such a test also had
an expected value of zero, the test was never run but reported as
PASS anyway.
Now the test runner always runs the first sub-test, regardless of the
data_size and result values. The sub-test array zero-termination only
applies for any additional sub-tests.
There are other ways fix it of course, but this solution at least
removes the surprise of eBPF tests with a zero result always succeeding.
Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
---
lib/test_bpf.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index d500320778c7..baff847a02da 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -6659,7 +6659,14 @@ static int run_one(const struct bpf_prog *fp, struct bpf_test *test)
u64 duration;
u32 ret;
- if (test->test[i].data_size == 0 &&
+ /*
+ * NOTE: Several sub-tests may be present, in which case
+ * a zero {data_size, result} tuple indicates the end of
+ * the sub-test array. The first test is always run,
+ * even if both data_size and result happen to be zero.
+ */
+ if (i > 0 &&
+ test->test[i].data_size == 0 &&
test->test[i].result == 0)
break;
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-07-21 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-21 10:38 Johan Almbladh [this message]
2021-07-24 0:23 ` [PATCH] bpf/tests: do not PASS tests without actually testing the result Andrii Nakryiko
2021-07-24 0:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210721103822.3755111-1-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com \
--to=johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com \
--cc=Tony.Ambardar@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).