From: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
Tony.Ambardar@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 13/14] bpf/tests: add tests for BPF_CMPXCHG
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:17:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210726081738.1833704-14-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210726081738.1833704-1-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Tests for BPF_CMPXCHG with both word and double word operands. As with
the tests for other atomic operations, these tests only check the result
of the arithmetic operation. The atomicity of the operations is not tested.
Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
---
lib/test_bpf.c | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 166 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index ac50cb023324..af5758151d0a 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -5682,6 +5682,172 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
#undef BPF_ATOMIC_OP_TEST2
#undef BPF_ATOMIC_OP_TEST3
#undef BPF_ATOMIC_OP_TEST4
+ /* BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG */
+ {
+ "BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG: Test successful return",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, R10, -40, 0x01234567),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 0x01234567),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R3, 0x89abcdef),
+ BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG, R10, R3, -40),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 0x01234567 } },
+ .stack_depth = 40,
+ },
+ {
+ "BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG: Test successful store",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, R10, -40, 0x01234567),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 0x01234567),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R3, 0x89abcdef),
+ BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG, R10, R3, -40),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, R0, R10, -40),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 0x89abcdef } },
+ .stack_depth = 40,
+ },
+ {
+ "BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG: Test failure return",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, R10, -40, 0x01234567),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 0x76543210),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R3, 0x89abcdef),
+ BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG, R10, R3, -40),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 0x01234567 } },
+ .stack_depth = 40,
+ },
+ {
+ "BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG: Test failure store",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, R10, -40, 0x01234567),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 0x76543210),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R3, 0x89abcdef),
+ BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG, R10, R3, -40),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, R0, R10, -40),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 0x01234567 } },
+ .stack_depth = 40,
+ },
+ {
+ "BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG: Test side effects",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, R10, -40, 0x01234567),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 0x01234567),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R3, 0x89abcdef),
+ BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG, R10, R3, -40),
+ BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG, R10, R3, -40),
+ BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOV, R0, R3),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 0x89abcdef } },
+ .stack_depth = 40,
+ },
+ /* BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW, BPF_CMPXCHG */
+ {
+ "BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW, BPF_CMPXCHG: Test successful return",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R1, 0x0123456789abcdefULL),
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R2, 0xfecdba9876543210ULL),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, R0, R1),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, R10, R1, -40),
+ BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_DW, BPF_CMPXCHG, R10, R2, -40),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, R0, R1, 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, R0, R1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 0 } },
+ .stack_depth = 40,
+ },
+ {
+ "BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW, BPF_CMPXCHG: Test successful store",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R1, 0x0123456789abcdefULL),
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R2, 0xfecdba9876543210ULL),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, R0, R1),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, R10, R0, -40),
+ BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_DW, BPF_CMPXCHG, R10, R2, -40),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, R0, R10, -40),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, R0, R2, 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, R0, R2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 0 } },
+ .stack_depth = 40,
+ },
+ {
+ "BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW, BPF_CMPXCHG: Test failure return",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R1, 0x0123456789abcdefULL),
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R2, 0xfecdba9876543210ULL),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, R0, R1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, R0, 1),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, R10, R1, -40),
+ BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_DW, BPF_CMPXCHG, R10, R2, -40),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, R0, R1, 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, R0, R1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 0 } },
+ .stack_depth = 40,
+ },
+ {
+ "BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW, BPF_CMPXCHG: Test failure store",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R1, 0x0123456789abcdefULL),
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R2, 0xfecdba9876543210ULL),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, R0, R1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, R0, 1),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, R10, R1, -40),
+ BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_DW, BPF_CMPXCHG, R10, R2, -40),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, R0, R10, -40),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, R0, R1, 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, R0, R1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 0 } },
+ .stack_depth = 40,
+ },
+ {
+ "BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW, BPF_CMPXCHG: Test side effects",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R1, 0x0123456789abcdefULL),
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R2, 0xfecdba9876543210ULL),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, R0, R1),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, R10, R1, -40),
+ BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_DW, BPF_CMPXCHG, R10, R2, -40),
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R0, 0xfecdba9876543210ULL),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, R0, R2, 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, R0, R2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 0 } },
+ .stack_depth = 40,
+ },
/* BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JEQ | BPF_K */
{
"JMP32_JEQ_K: Small immediate",
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-26 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-26 8:17 [RFC PATCH 00/14] bpf/tests: Extend the eBPF test suite Johan Almbladh
2021-07-26 8:17 ` [RFC PATCH 01/14] bpf/tests: add BPF_JMP32 test cases Johan Almbladh
2021-07-26 8:17 ` [RFC PATCH 02/14] bpf/tests: add BPF_MOV tests for zero and sign extension Johan Almbladh
2021-07-26 8:17 ` [RFC PATCH 03/14] bpf/tests: fix typos in test case descriptions Johan Almbladh
2021-07-26 8:17 ` [RFC PATCH 04/14] bpf/tests: add more tests of ALU32 and ALU64 bitwise operations Johan Almbladh
2021-07-26 8:17 ` [RFC PATCH 05/14] bpf/tests: add more ALU32 tests for BPF_LSH/RSH/ARSH Johan Almbladh
2021-07-26 8:17 ` [RFC PATCH 06/14] bpf/tests: add more BPF_LSH/RSH/ARSH tests for ALU64 Johan Almbladh
2021-07-26 8:17 ` [RFC PATCH 07/14] bpf/tests: add more ALU64 BPF_MUL tests Johan Almbladh
2021-07-26 8:17 ` [RFC PATCH 08/14] bpf/tests: add tests for ALU operations implemented with function calls Johan Almbladh
2021-07-26 8:17 ` [RFC PATCH 09/14] bpf/tests: add word-order tests for load/store of double words Johan Almbladh
2021-07-26 8:17 ` [RFC PATCH 10/14] bpf/tests: add branch conversion JIT test Johan Almbladh
2021-07-26 8:17 ` [RFC PATCH 11/14] bpf/tests: add test for 32-bit context pointer argument passing Johan Almbladh
2021-07-26 8:17 ` [RFC PATCH 12/14] bpf/tests: add tests for atomic operations Johan Almbladh
2021-07-26 8:17 ` Johan Almbladh [this message]
2021-07-26 8:17 ` [RFC PATCH 14/14] bpf/tests: add tail call test suite Johan Almbladh
2021-07-26 22:53 ` [RFC PATCH 00/14] bpf/tests: Extend the eBPF " Andrii Nakryiko
2021-07-28 8:27 ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-07-28 12:15 ` Johan Almbladh
2021-07-28 16:47 ` [PATCH] bpf: Fix off-by-one in tail call count limiting Johan Almbladh
2021-07-28 19:13 ` Yonghong Song
2021-07-29 21:37 ` Johan Almbladh
2021-07-29 22:29 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-07-29 22:48 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-08-01 8:37 ` Johan Almbladh
2021-08-02 20:28 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-08-05 14:37 ` Johan Almbladh
2021-08-05 22:54 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210726081738.1833704-14-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com \
--to=johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com \
--cc=Tony.Ambardar@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).