From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B329AC43214 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 15:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08D9610FB for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 15:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242618AbhHEPyu (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 11:54:50 -0400 Received: from mx0a-0064b401.pphosted.com ([205.220.166.238]:10636 "EHLO mx0a-0064b401.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242533AbhHEPyt (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 11:54:49 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0250809.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0064b401.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 175DmQql022022; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 08:54:15 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=windriver.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS06212021; bh=p0Klk/qRshMyCt+0KA1h9mJQvMOs4I4kxBn2yHwaHCU=; b=ACgP0m2SoezMUsx+Kg/1s438sfpCC3rruM+Oq6q27wK5kyTMnFhIwBsXTmFDGKjJ62e1 bUGRjWPzKRJyIdubs05aMTCddt5r9TBfMs7vqxXK6XrjPelMJGYtpq33Ro4ZtJox/5JB fNXsVr3ByOnqL11Crx8ZGdtVHR8LrnYt28AkPw5VbIiOHkCBIUn95d/SWZ/SPXcK3+ZA avI4UOmBjFHEiwK2+68UKqKLKV/e/yDUU0pjZFAqsJQMy4Rd2hWNEiWwz/Zn4bxBbx73 sWV+NEKK7Cdo+85LPNjh+FIImNNGrC8eW3PzhiezkrFeBxiwW52YsJo4hGFbUlB7m0Dm XA== Received: from nam11-bn8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn8nam11lp2175.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.58.175]) by mx0a-0064b401.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3a800vrrbf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 05 Aug 2021 08:54:15 -0700 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=KWBFj4iDsjjznkelj9n7i9Pigvq/IgCzDlPvTGzXRmlcqsLbUKTwuu7Duag+LeTrJngTQjEUGcRK902ONDzdQ8lfl3p5gktAno86Ijk6rxcINhGL89PoJyGPrLPHt0b7z2n4ITBIwk9is9Aq9eFuZqY8zR6bauyfkFX2Z6A2BPS/lsZzsIeveplLgud6nUTbiqG87Zp0+93BQ0IY9DQIAKAhSw/SVQ3DmW+7+Am9vJZEoEMcXsFtDvOIuI/cFHhoirK958KSYXgxE6QrGsNi64tC9F/A3LX+zuMgdKP0+EK6a66nebYYcE81CVEAbMAs88AjrdEHulDaGFXE79tEzA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=p0Klk/qRshMyCt+0KA1h9mJQvMOs4I4kxBn2yHwaHCU=; b=WPi7kBmd6kjx+tteGEzSFXC9TZVYycGMAEViRM/GnusJodonYRrtn7dstxahoahJU/V9iHvI3zgAIn2SRU5tHv7xVOJAD+ZFn1PZyzKhlElyAhvUf3u/V1drGGpO0xxvTjV6cNocpT0cbPURXzf5Chto8G5oz75c3c8ey+btYNQdmCcimiHz9qbNL/M5epXgWTmjT6If1FN4BA0VOpF07hhx/SKPD2KkxbB5lfM0TVjvlotRmJzXbrRc/6aEwFVpEKji9ZJNgN0yygR3n9/H1vUa+WSrQdG++lY+p+ASbxHHk1w5QkK8RBsJJTJ9PvAReuSrURa3X268Z3HVBeLIrg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=windriver.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=windriver.com; dkim=pass header.d=windriver.com; arc=none Authentication-Results: vger.kernel.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;vger.kernel.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=windriver.com; Received: from DM4PR11MB5327.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:392::22) by DM5PR1101MB2204.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:58::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4394.18; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 15:54:13 +0000 Received: from DM4PR11MB5327.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ccb:2bce:6896:a0c3]) by DM4PR11MB5327.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ccb:2bce:6896:a0c3%7]) with mapi id 15.20.4394.017; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 15:54:13 +0000 From: Ovidiu Panait To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, ast@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, benedict.schlueter@rub.de, piotras@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH 5.4 6/6] bpf, selftests: Adjust few selftest outcomes wrt unreachable code Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 18:53:43 +0300 Message-Id: <20210805155343.3618696-7-ovidiu.panait@windriver.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210805155343.3618696-1-ovidiu.panait@windriver.com> References: <20210805155343.3618696-1-ovidiu.panait@windriver.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-ClientProxiedBy: VI1PR0501CA0002.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:800:92::12) To DM4PR11MB5327.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:392::22) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from otp-linux03.wrs.com (46.97.150.20) by VI1PR0501CA0002.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:800:92::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4394.15 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 15:54:11 +0000 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: a71ae07d-b031-4e36-949d-08d958294538 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DM5PR1101MB2204: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:8882; X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255;CTRY:;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:DM4PR11MB5327.namprd11.prod.outlook.com;PTR:;CAT:NONE;SFS:(4636009)(136003)(39850400004)(346002)(396003)(376002)(366004)(4326008)(2616005)(38350700002)(38100700002)(956004)(6916009)(66946007)(66476007)(6512007)(66556008)(316002)(6666004)(52116002)(86362001)(2906002)(5660300002)(8676002)(26005)(8936002)(83380400001)(186003)(1076003)(6506007)(44832011)(478600001)(36756003)(6486002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: =?us-ascii?Q?4FUuXMmp0R+o3Po+EJQinod/2DSC0TGpqxPQngAspNH5vSYcMeXTXyvCY5Vu?= =?us-ascii?Q?wM7ewCsuWYzl9v2FXjR34G/S4Ud9xi+9NRcxR6VIA51kMbFZ/ncs/mkPI59r?= =?us-ascii?Q?PQPBLDZYLmwl8sQzjg9ilmfYHCME+AtEB1zJjJt6baebIX2W5NJZsM1HfXPt?= =?us-ascii?Q?hlYBopkHi03zUpKdIUoKDnMHn5PTkPN71gFe+2XReR20Pw8VFtxpxjp8RqBy?= =?us-ascii?Q?OQZk4MoMUe4pOVeHqHgjEiqU2UjnFIFO8U80ROwU69qu3FRYFtafTps6KRq/?= =?us-ascii?Q?P5N7mnMW0cXKPcuPu2B6NpDooCmnN1pkl5t1ZPae2eyKGDIPsxpLNqumQw2u?= =?us-ascii?Q?T4IzQBTe//ZTbsYXApD0HmW3/wOOI7iqIDCzhqtMJYbMlZ8wICC1AKQcGyq8?= =?us-ascii?Q?3DK8FqKSckQ5U5FSmGHQEciThtqjn6bcX+Tx9s0fov0bCoQywcszH2+W895T?= =?us-ascii?Q?shMOInlC3uPRUnbnRUe56aEmweLTppyt5biNTGuwt7mRIy/1X8jaW9V/KTfC?= =?us-ascii?Q?+W1GCVKPxqMlEqDPGx+TW0B3sBHxxuUlylfeLmrfyXG7lx5zUQwc3nNdOgoQ?= =?us-ascii?Q?i7PwHoRUUtkvDOJ2eaXu+sNqGWhkPFWrkoERucAmnYAdcSV+uB2w7f4Innjd?= =?us-ascii?Q?pblHvPPmvmVSTdiL+JTjyIX6ShphLp62CG2fagM7FQ/2hGkthZRFYm1npkZe?= =?us-ascii?Q?/nHT/6wH01Xnf+dJ7rOtbCYuZKPBfUBO1ge2wxQ4Hct9esIMwAVTLtQMhcQN?= =?us-ascii?Q?ksld4WBEKtQywKq0kG/f9LZg21Gpq4K4TOsASIP7mO/7tcf/B1WDPp2kXuAt?= =?us-ascii?Q?M/lB2aOTzNL1i0PBd4ispoOaVG9wD7dm4CxwNbYIAOGFHMrnpSPM2SQrJSiO?= =?us-ascii?Q?svp9AUVbvnkLB2Rc5ruIsr/oPPrjqU97D6FYE0OGXH65G6ubZts7M+1DUvWY?= =?us-ascii?Q?7maEcXogG95NXJA4I3r7WK8/2/HTBVeXCj3aMHGrneORdZjkJt/l6Y6FqUXm?= =?us-ascii?Q?YLKgtUJ3LxF+1kD/X0DIjYEELMJ9Nx3pV5Pld4WCoSmV33Udsomk7Cmke0LD?= =?us-ascii?Q?FIa0jyeirKXTDXFW6vQgkRFCdUDq7qa60XDQXMggHXUL1fb2uz2hjNy4GF5P?= =?us-ascii?Q?wtf5tF/ipm9WrfzHEaok4jvYx3HfgGr46YPRvXdd0BfgahyfOeNx4zWfOdXh?= =?us-ascii?Q?g/45MkcfQzvv5UxLD7ncEHsbQqnKpkhT3E5reCmSvMDyrC0K8omebCsa+T+V?= =?us-ascii?Q?+J2zaOCh7IYfTJsHX7NPt8nOg75F/yUlzueEteIj3x8SDYgRutuMonDkWO84?= =?us-ascii?Q?ldZ1fj7ZyoCz1IkBOfw3Vg9w?= X-OriginatorOrg: windriver.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a71ae07d-b031-4e36-949d-08d958294538 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM4PR11MB5327.namprd11.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Aug 2021 15:54:13.1419 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 8ddb2873-a1ad-4a18-ae4e-4644631433be X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: 9Y4iJNoENgZK6s5aEJLz++Yx81jgUo+Ro03+5bdpbVlKIMVIuBHk20079RVVDwv3XiP/qpjyxPi2KUgElBkCOax7yT3Z/AabwJ8HWOvyVCo= X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR1101MB2204 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 3rqEK7h9jonCeUG5GazLPR-fE0BFwqhU X-Proofpoint-GUID: 3rqEK7h9jonCeUG5GazLPR-fE0BFwqhU X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.391,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-08-05_05,2021-08-05_02,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2107140000 definitions=main-2108050097 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org From: Daniel Borkmann commit 973377ffe8148180b2651825b92ae91988141b05 upstream In almost all cases from test_verifier that have been changed in here, we've had an unreachable path with a load from a register which has an invalid address on purpose. This was basically to make sure that we never walk this path and to have the verifier complain if it would otherwise. Change it to match on the right error for unprivileged given we now test these paths under speculative execution. There's one case where we match on exact # of insns_processed. Due to the extra path, this will of course mismatch on unprivileged. Thus, restrict the test->insn_processed check to privileged-only. In one other case, we result in a 'pointer comparison prohibited' error. This is similarly due to verifying an 'invalid' branch where we end up with a value pointer on one side of the comparison. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Reviewed-by: John Fastabend Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov [OP: ignore changes to tests that do not exist in 5.4] Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c | 4 ++++ .../selftests/bpf/verifier/dead_code.c | 2 ++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jset.c | 10 +++++---- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c | 2 ++ .../selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c | 7 +++--- 7 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index d27fd929abb9..43224c5ec1e9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, } } - if (test->insn_processed) { + if (!unpriv && test->insn_processed) { uint32_t insn_processed; char *proc; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c index c42ce135786a..92c02e4a1b62 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c @@ -523,6 +523,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, -1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT }, { @@ -543,6 +545,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, -1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT }, { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/dead_code.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/dead_code.c index 50a8a63be4ac..a7e60a773da6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/dead_code.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/dead_code.c @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_0, 10, -4), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 7, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c index f0961c58581e..f2fabf6ebc61 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, }, { @@ -135,6 +137,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, }, { @@ -198,6 +202,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, }, { @@ -265,6 +271,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, }, @@ -333,6 +341,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, }, @@ -401,6 +411,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, }, @@ -469,6 +481,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, }, @@ -537,6 +551,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, }, @@ -605,6 +621,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, }, @@ -673,6 +691,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, }, @@ -741,6 +761,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jset.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jset.c index 8dcd4e0383d5..11fc68da735e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jset.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jset.c @@ -82,8 +82,8 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, - .retval_unpriv = 1, - .result_unpriv = ACCEPT, + .errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .retval = 1, .result = ACCEPT, }, @@ -141,7 +141,8 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, - .result_unpriv = ACCEPT, + .errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, }, { @@ -162,6 +163,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, - .result_unpriv = ACCEPT, + .errstr_unpriv = "R9 !read_ok", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c index c3f6f650deb7..593f5b586e87 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c @@ -418,6 +418,8 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R7 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 0, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c index f9c91b95080e..188ac92c56d1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 }, .result = ACCEPT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .errstr_unpriv = "R2 tried to add from different maps, paths or scalars", + .errstr_unpriv = "R2 pointer comparison prohibited", .retval = 0, }, { @@ -159,7 +159,8 @@ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), // fake-dead code; targeted from branch A to - // prevent dead code sanitization + // prevent dead code sanitization, rejected + // via branch B however BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), @@ -167,7 +168,7 @@ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 }, .result = ACCEPT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .errstr_unpriv = "R2 tried to add from different maps, paths or scalars", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", .retval = 0, }, { -- 2.25.1