bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	iii@linux.ibm.com
Cc: kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 11/13] bpf/tests: Expand branch conversion JIT test
Date: Thu,  2 Sep 2021 20:52:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210902185229.1840281-12-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210902185229.1840281-1-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>

This patch expands the branch conversion test introduced by 66e5eb84
("bpf, tests: Add branch conversion JIT test"). The test now includes
a JMP with maximum eBPF offset. This triggers branch conversion for the
64-bit MIPS JIT. Additional variants are also added for cases when the
branch is taken or not taken.

Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
---
 lib/test_bpf.c | 143 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index b28cd815b6b7..3eb25d4b58af 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -463,41 +463,6 @@ static int bpf_fill_stxdw(struct bpf_test *self)
 	return __bpf_fill_stxdw(self, BPF_DW);
 }
 
-static int bpf_fill_long_jmp(struct bpf_test *self)
-{
-	unsigned int len = BPF_MAXINSNS;
-	struct bpf_insn *insn;
-	int i;
-
-	insn = kmalloc_array(len, sizeof(*insn), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!insn)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	insn[0] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 1);
-	insn[1] = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R0, 1, len - 2 - 1);
-
-	/*
-	 * Fill with a complex 64-bit operation that expands to a lot of
-	 * instructions on 32-bit JITs. The large jump offset can then
-	 * overflow the conditional branch field size, triggering a branch
-	 * conversion mechanism in some JITs.
-	 *
-	 * Note: BPF_MAXINSNS of ALU64 MUL is enough to trigger such branch
-	 * conversion on the 32-bit MIPS JIT. For other JITs, the instruction
-	 * count and/or operation may need to be modified to trigger the
-	 * branch conversion.
-	 */
-	for (i = 2; i < len - 1; i++)
-		insn[i] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MUL, R0, (i << 16) + i);
-
-	insn[len - 1] = BPF_EXIT_INSN();
-
-	self->u.ptr.insns = insn;
-	self->u.ptr.len = len;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int __bpf_ld_imm64(struct bpf_insn insns[2], u8 reg, s64 imm64)
 {
 	struct bpf_insn tmp[] = {BPF_LD_IMM64(reg, imm64)};
@@ -506,6 +471,73 @@ static int __bpf_ld_imm64(struct bpf_insn insns[2], u8 reg, s64 imm64)
 	return 2;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Branch conversion tests. Complex operations can expand to a lot
+ * of instructions when JITed. This in turn may cause jump offsets
+ * to overflow the field size of the native instruction, triggering
+ * a branch conversion mechanism in some JITs.
+ */
+static int __bpf_fill_max_jmp(struct bpf_test *self, int jmp, int imm)
+{
+	struct bpf_insn *insns;
+	int len = S16_MAX + 5;
+	int i;
+
+	insns = kmalloc_array(len, sizeof(*insns), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!insns)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	i = __bpf_ld_imm64(insns, R1, 0x0123456789abcdefULL);
+	insns[i++] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 1);
+	insns[i++] = BPF_JMP_IMM(jmp, R0, imm, S16_MAX);
+	insns[i++] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 2);
+	insns[i++] = BPF_EXIT_INSN();
+
+	while (i < len - 1) {
+		static const int ops[] = {
+			BPF_LSH, BPF_RSH, BPF_ARSH, BPF_ADD,
+			BPF_SUB, BPF_MUL, BPF_DIV, BPF_MOD,
+		};
+		int op = ops[(i >> 1) % ARRAY_SIZE(ops)];
+
+		if (i & 1)
+			insns[i++] = BPF_ALU32_REG(op, R0, R1);
+		else
+			insns[i++] = BPF_ALU64_REG(op, R0, R1);
+	}
+
+	insns[i++] = BPF_EXIT_INSN();
+	self->u.ptr.insns = insns;
+	self->u.ptr.len = len;
+	BUG_ON(i != len);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* Branch taken by runtime decision */
+static int bpf_fill_max_jmp_taken(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+	return __bpf_fill_max_jmp(self, BPF_JEQ, 1);
+}
+
+/* Branch not taken by runtime decision */
+static int bpf_fill_max_jmp_not_taken(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+	return __bpf_fill_max_jmp(self, BPF_JEQ, 0);
+}
+
+/* Branch always taken, known at JIT time */
+static int bpf_fill_max_jmp_always_taken(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+	return __bpf_fill_max_jmp(self, BPF_JGE, 0);
+}
+
+/* Branch never taken, known at JIT time */
+static int bpf_fill_max_jmp_never_taken(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+	return __bpf_fill_max_jmp(self, BPF_JLT, 0);
+}
+
 /* Test an ALU shift operation for all valid shift values */
 static int __bpf_fill_alu_shift(struct bpf_test *self, u8 op,
 				u8 mode, bool alu32)
@@ -8651,14 +8683,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 		{ },
 		{ { 0, 1 } },
 	},
-	{	/* Mainly checking JIT here. */
-		"BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long conditional jump",
-		{ },
-		INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
-		{ },
-		{ { 0, 1 } },
-		.fill_helper = bpf_fill_long_jmp,
-	},
 	{
 		"JMP_JA: Jump, gap, jump, ...",
 		{ },
@@ -11007,6 +11031,39 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 		{ },
 		{ { 0, 0 } },
 	},
+	/* Conditional branch conversions */
+	{
+		"Long conditional jump: taken at runtime",
+		{ },
+		INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+		{ },
+		{ { 0, 1 } },
+		.fill_helper = bpf_fill_max_jmp_taken,
+	},
+	{
+		"Long conditional jump: not taken at runtime",
+		{ },
+		INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+		{ },
+		{ { 0, 2 } },
+		.fill_helper = bpf_fill_max_jmp_not_taken,
+	},
+	{
+		"Long conditional jump: always taken, known at JIT time",
+		{ },
+		INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+		{ },
+		{ { 0, 1 } },
+		.fill_helper = bpf_fill_max_jmp_always_taken,
+	},
+	{
+		"Long conditional jump: never taken, known at JIT time",
+		{ },
+		INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+		{ },
+		{ { 0, 2 } },
+		.fill_helper = bpf_fill_max_jmp_never_taken,
+	},
 	/* Staggered jump sequences, immediate */
 	{
 		"Staggered jumps: JMP_JA",
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-02 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-02 18:52 [PATCH bpf-next 00/13] bpf/tests: Extend JIT test suite coverage Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/13] bpf/tests: Allow different number of runs per test case Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/13] bpf/tests: Reduce memory footprint of test suite Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/13] bpf/tests: Add exhaustive tests of ALU shift values Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/13] bpf/tests: Add exhaustive tests of ALU operand magnitudes Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/13] bpf/tests: Add exhaustive tests of JMP " Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/13] bpf/tests: Add staggered JMP and JMP32 tests Johan Almbladh
2021-09-03  8:22   ` Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/13] bpf/tests: Add exhaustive test of LD_IMM64 immediate magnitudes Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/13] bpf/tests: Add test case flag for verifier zero-extension Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/13] bpf/tests: Add JMP tests with small offsets Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/13] bpf/tests: Add JMP tests with degenerate conditional Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` Johan Almbladh [this message]
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/13] bpf/tests: Add more BPF_END byte order conversion tests Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/13] bpf/tests: Add tail call limit test with external function call Johan Almbladh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210902185229.1840281-12-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com \
    --to=johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).