bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 1/4] bpf: Introduce BPF nospec instruction for mitigating Spectre v4
Date: Tue,  7 Sep 2021 16:16:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210907131701.1910024-2-ovidiu.panait@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210907131701.1910024-1-ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

commit f5e81d1117501546b7be050c5fbafa6efd2c722c upstream.

In case of JITs, each of the JIT backends compiles the BPF nospec instruction
/either/ to a machine instruction which emits a speculation barrier /or/ to
/no/ machine instruction in case the underlying architecture is not affected
by Speculative Store Bypass or has different mitigations in place already.

This covers both x86 and (implicitly) arm64: In case of x86, we use 'lfence'
instruction for mitigation. In case of arm64, we rely on the firmware mitigation
as controlled via the ssbd kernel parameter. Whenever the mitigation is enabled,
it works for all of the kernel code with no need to provide any additional
instructions here (hence only comment in arm64 JIT). Other archs can follow
as needed. The BPF nospec instruction is specifically targeting Spectre v4
since i) we don't use a serialization barrier for the Spectre v1 case, and
ii) mitigation instructions for v1 and v4 might be different on some archs.

The BPF nospec is required for a future commit, where the BPF verifier does
annotate intermediate BPF programs with speculation barriers.

Co-developed-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Benedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[OP: - adjusted context for 5.4
     - apply riscv changes to /arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c]
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
---
 arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c         |  3 +++
 arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c     | 13 +++++++++++++
 arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c          |  3 +++
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c |  6 ++++++
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c     |  4 ++++
 arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c      |  5 +++++
 arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c  |  3 +++
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c       |  7 +++++++
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c     |  6 ++++++
 include/linux/filter.h            | 15 +++++++++++++++
 kernel/bpf/core.c                 | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 kernel/bpf/disasm.c               | 16 +++++++++-------
 12 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
index 7216653424fd..b51a8c7b0111 100644
--- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
+++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
@@ -1602,6 +1602,9 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
 		rn = arm_bpf_get_reg32(src_lo, tmp2[1], ctx);
 		emit_ldx_r(dst, rn, off, ctx, BPF_SIZE(code));
 		break;
+	/* speculation barrier */
+	case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC:
+		break;
 	/* ST: *(size *)(dst + off) = imm */
 	case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
 	case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 945e5f690ede..afc7d41347f7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -701,6 +701,19 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx,
 		}
 		break;
 
+	/* speculation barrier */
+	case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC:
+		/*
+		 * Nothing required here.
+		 *
+		 * In case of arm64, we rely on the firmware mitigation of
+		 * Speculative Store Bypass as controlled via the ssbd kernel
+		 * parameter. Whenever the mitigation is enabled, it works
+		 * for all of the kernel code with no need to provide any
+		 * additional instructions.
+		 */
+		break;
+
 	/* ST: *(size *)(dst + off) = imm */
 	case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
 	case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
diff --git a/arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c b/arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c
index 561154cbcc40..b31b91e57c34 100644
--- a/arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c
+++ b/arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c
@@ -1355,6 +1355,9 @@ static int build_one_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx,
 		}
 		break;
 
+	case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC: /* speculation barrier */
+		break;
+
 	case BPF_ST | BPF_B | BPF_MEM:
 	case BPF_ST | BPF_H | BPF_MEM:
 	case BPF_ST | BPF_W | BPF_MEM:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index be3517ef0574..20bfd753bcba 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -644,6 +644,12 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
 			}
 			break;
 
+		/*
+		 * BPF_ST NOSPEC (speculation barrier)
+		 */
+		case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC:
+			break;
+
 		/*
 		 * BPF_ST(X)
 		 */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index e2279fed8f56..0eefe6193253 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1313,6 +1313,10 @@ static int emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
 		emit(rv_ld(rd, 0, RV_REG_T1), ctx);
 		break;
 
+	/* speculation barrier */
+	case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC:
+		break;
+
 	/* ST: *(size *)(dst + off) = imm */
 	case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
 		emit_imm(RV_REG_T1, imm, ctx);
diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index e160f4650f8e..3e6612d8b921 100644
--- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -913,6 +913,11 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp,
 			break;
 		}
 		break;
+	/*
+	 * BPF_NOSPEC (speculation barrier)
+	 */
+	case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC:
+		break;
 	/*
 	 * BPF_ST(X)
 	 */
diff --git a/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c b/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c
index 3364e2a00989..fef734473c0f 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c
@@ -1287,6 +1287,9 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
 			return 1;
 		break;
 	}
+	/* speculation barrier */
+	case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC:
+		break;
 	/* ST: *(size *)(dst + off) = imm */
 	case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
 	case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 6e884f17634f..55f62dca28aa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -728,6 +728,13 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
 			}
 			break;
 
+			/* speculation barrier */
+		case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC:
+			if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XMM2))
+				/* Emit 'lfence' */
+				EMIT3(0x0F, 0xAE, 0xE8);
+			break;
+
 			/* ST: *(u8*)(dst_reg + off) = imm */
 		case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
 			if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index 0fcba32077c8..2914f900034e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -1705,6 +1705,12 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
 			i++;
 			break;
 		}
+		/* speculation barrier */
+		case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC:
+			if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XMM2))
+				/* Emit 'lfence' */
+				EMIT3(0x0F, 0xAE, 0xE8);
+			break;
 		/* ST: *(u8*)(dst_reg + off) = imm */
 		case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
 		case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index c53e2fe3c8f7..c4f89340f498 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ struct ctl_table_header;
 /* unused opcode to mark call to interpreter with arguments */
 #define BPF_CALL_ARGS	0xe0
 
+/* unused opcode to mark speculation barrier for mitigating
+ * Speculative Store Bypass
+ */
+#define BPF_NOSPEC	0xc0
+
 /* As per nm, we expose JITed images as text (code) section for
  * kallsyms. That way, tools like perf can find it to match
  * addresses.
@@ -368,6 +373,16 @@ static inline bool insn_is_zext(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
 		.off   = 0,					\
 		.imm   = 0 })
 
+/* Speculation barrier */
+
+#define BPF_ST_NOSPEC()						\
+	((struct bpf_insn) {					\
+		.code  = BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC,			\
+		.dst_reg = 0,					\
+		.src_reg = 0,					\
+		.off   = 0,					\
+		.imm   = 0 })
+
 /* Internal classic blocks for direct assignment */
 
 #define __BPF_STMT(CODE, K)					\
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 323913ba13b3..d9a3d995bd96 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 #include <linux/perf_event.h>
 
+#include <asm/barrier.h>
 #include <asm/unaligned.h>
 
 /* Registers */
@@ -1310,6 +1311,7 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, u64 *stack)
 		/* Non-UAPI available opcodes. */
 		[BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL_ARGS] = &&JMP_CALL_ARGS,
 		[BPF_JMP | BPF_TAIL_CALL] = &&JMP_TAIL_CALL,
+		[BPF_ST  | BPF_NOSPEC] = &&ST_NOSPEC,
 	};
 #undef BPF_INSN_3_LBL
 #undef BPF_INSN_2_LBL
@@ -1550,7 +1552,21 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, u64 *stack)
 	COND_JMP(s, JSGE, >=)
 	COND_JMP(s, JSLE, <=)
 #undef COND_JMP
-	/* STX and ST and LDX*/
+	/* ST, STX and LDX*/
+	ST_NOSPEC:
+		/* Speculation barrier for mitigating Speculative Store Bypass.
+		 * In case of arm64, we rely on the firmware mitigation as
+		 * controlled via the ssbd kernel parameter. Whenever the
+		 * mitigation is enabled, it works for all of the kernel code
+		 * with no need to provide any additional instructions here.
+		 * In case of x86, we use 'lfence' insn for mitigation. We
+		 * reuse preexisting logic from Spectre v1 mitigation that
+		 * happens to produce the required code on x86 for v4 as well.
+		 */
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86
+		barrier_nospec();
+#endif
+		CONT;
 #define LDST(SIZEOP, SIZE)						\
 	STX_MEM_##SIZEOP:						\
 		*(SIZE *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off) = SRC;	\
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
index b44d8c447afd..ff1dd7d45b58 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
@@ -162,15 +162,17 @@ void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_insn_cbs *cbs,
 		else
 			verbose(cbs->private_data, "BUG_%02x\n", insn->code);
 	} else if (class == BPF_ST) {
-		if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM) {
+		if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_MEM) {
+			verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) *(%s *)(r%d %+d) = %d\n",
+				insn->code,
+				bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3],
+				insn->dst_reg,
+				insn->off, insn->imm);
+		} else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == 0xc0 /* BPF_NOSPEC, no UAPI */) {
+			verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) nospec\n", insn->code);
+		} else {
 			verbose(cbs->private_data, "BUG_st_%02x\n", insn->code);
-			return;
 		}
-		verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) *(%s *)(r%d %+d) = %d\n",
-			insn->code,
-			bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3],
-			insn->dst_reg,
-			insn->off, insn->imm);
 	} else if (class == BPF_LDX) {
 		if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM) {
 			verbose(cbs->private_data, "BUG_ldx_%02x\n", insn->code);
-- 
2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-07 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-07 13:16 [PATCH 5.4 0/4] bpf: backport fixes for CVE-2021-34556/CVE-2021-35477 Ovidiu Panait
2021-09-07 13:16 ` Ovidiu Panait [this message]
2021-09-07 13:16 ` [PATCH 5.4 2/4] bpf: Fix leakage due to insufficient speculative store bypass mitigation Ovidiu Panait
2021-09-07 13:17 ` [PATCH 5.4 3/4] bpf: verifier: Allocate idmap scratch in verifier env Ovidiu Panait
2021-09-07 13:17 ` [PATCH 5.4 4/4] bpf: Fix pointer arithmetic mask tightening under state pruning Ovidiu Panait
2021-09-13  9:17 ` [PATCH 5.4 0/4] bpf: backport fixes for CVE-2021-34556/CVE-2021-35477 Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210907131701.1910024-2-ovidiu.panait@windriver.com \
    --to=ovidiu.panait@windriver.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).