From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/5] core_reloc fixes for s390
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:12:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211025131214.731972-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021234653.643302-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/
v1 -> v2: Drop bpf_core_calc_field_relo() restructuring, split
__BYTE_ORDER__ change.
Hi,
this series fixes test failures in core_reloc on s390.
Patches 1-4 replace __BYTE_ORDER with __BYTE_ORDER__ in order to fix an
endianness bug and make the code consistent.
Patch 5 fixes an endianness issue in test_core_reloc_mods.
Best regards,
Ilya
Ilya Leoshkevich (5):
libbpf: Use __BYTE_ORDER__
selftests/bpf: Use __BYTE_ORDER__
samples: seccomp: use __BYTE_ORDER__
selftests/seccomp: Use __BYTE_ORDER__
selftests/bpf: Fix test_core_reloc_mods on big-endian machines
samples/seccomp/bpf-helper.h | 8 ++++----
tools/lib/bpf/bpf_core_read.h | 2 +-
tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 4 ++--
tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c | 8 ++++----
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 4 ++--
tools/lib/bpf/linker.c | 12 ++++++------
tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.c | 2 +-
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_endian.c | 6 +++---
.../selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_mods.c | 9 +++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c | 4 ++--
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c | 14 +++++++-------
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lwt.c | 2 +-
.../bpf/verifier/perf_event_sample_period.c | 6 +++---
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 6 +++---
14 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
--
2.31.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-10-25 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-25 13:12 Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2021-10-25 13:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] libbpf: Use __BYTE_ORDER__ Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-10-25 22:44 ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-10-25 13:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/5] selftests/bpf: " Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-10-25 13:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/5] samples: seccomp: use __BYTE_ORDER__ Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-10-25 13:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/5] selftests/seccomp: Use __BYTE_ORDER__ Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-10-25 13:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/5] selftests/bpf: Fix test_core_reloc_mods on big-endian machines Ilya Leoshkevich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211025131214.731972-1-iii@linux.ibm.com \
--to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).