bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Jakub Sitnicki" <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
	"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>, "Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
	"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
	"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 7/8] selftests/bpf: Fix fd cleanup in sk_lookup test
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:05:00 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211028063501.2239335-8-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211028063501.2239335-1-memxor@gmail.com>

Similar to the fix in commit:
e31eec77e4ab ("bpf: selftests: Fix fd cleanup in get_branch_snapshot")

We use designated initializer to set fds to -1 without breaking on
future changes to MAX_SERVER constant denoting the array size.

The particular close(0) occurs on non-reuseport tests, so it can be seen
with -n 115/{2,3} but not 115/4. This can cause problems with future
tests if they depend on BTF fd never being acquired as fd 0, breaking
internal libbpf assumptions.

Fixes: 0ab5539f8584 ("selftests/bpf: Tests for BPF_SK_LOOKUP attach point")
Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c
index aee41547e7f4..6db07401bc49 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c
@@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ static void query_lookup_prog(struct test_sk_lookup *skel)
 
 static void run_lookup_prog(const struct test *t)
 {
-	int server_fds[MAX_SERVERS] = { -1 };
+	int server_fds[] = { [0 ... MAX_SERVERS - 1] = -1 };
 	int client_fd, reuse_conn_fd = -1;
 	struct bpf_link *lookup_link;
 	int i, err;
@@ -1053,7 +1053,7 @@ static void run_sk_assign(struct test_sk_lookup *skel,
 			  struct bpf_program *lookup_prog,
 			  const char *remote_ip, const char *local_ip)
 {
-	int server_fds[MAX_SERVERS] = { -1 };
+	int server_fds[] = { [0 ... MAX_SERVERS - 1] = -1 };
 	struct bpf_sk_lookup ctx;
 	__u64 server_cookie;
 	int i, err;
-- 
2.33.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-28  6:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-28  6:34 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/8] Typeless/weak ksym for gen_loader + misc fixups Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-10-28  6:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/8] bpf: Add bpf_kallsyms_lookup_name helper Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-10-28 18:10   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-10-28  6:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/8] libbpf: Add typeless ksym support to gen_loader Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-10-28  6:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/8] libbpf: Add weak " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-10-29  0:22   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-10-30 15:12     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-10-28  6:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/8] libbpf: Ensure that BPF syscall fds are never 0, 1, or 2 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-10-28 18:00   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-10-28  6:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/8] libbpf: Use O_CLOEXEC uniformly when opening fds Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-10-28 18:04   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-10-28  6:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/8] selftests/bpf: Add weak/typeless ksym test for light skeleton Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-10-28 18:06   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-10-28  6:35 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2021-10-28  6:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 8/8] selftests/bpf: Fix memory leak in test_ima Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211028063501.2239335-8-memxor@gmail.com \
    --to=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).