[PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] selftests: add test for kfunc call

[Hou Tao <hotforest@gmail.com>]

Hi,

The patchset add a test for kfunc call to ensure s32 is sufficient for
kfunc offset. Patch #1 unexports the subtests in ksyms_module.c to fix
the confusion in test output and patch #2 adds a test in ksyms_module.c
to ensure s32 is sufficient for kfunc offset.

Change Log:
v4:
 * remove merged patch "bpf, arm64: enable kfunc call"
 * rebased on bpf-next

v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220130092917.14544-1-hotforest@gmail.com
  * patch #2: newly-addded to unexport unnecessary subtests
  * patch #3: use kallsyms_find() instead of reimplementing it.
  * patch #3: ensure kfunc call is supported before checking
              whether s32 will be overflowed or not.

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220127071532.384888-1-houtao1@huawei.com
  * add a test to check whether imm will be overflowed for kfunc call

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220119144942.305568-1-houtao1@huawei.com

Hou Tao (2):
  selftests/bpf: do not export subtest as standalone test
  selftests/bpf: check whether s32 is sufficient for kfunc offset

 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms_module.c   | 46 ++++++++++++++++++-
 .../bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_frags.c         |  6 ---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c          |  4 +-
 .../bpf/prog_tests/xdp_cpumap_attach.c        |  4 +-
 .../bpf/prog_tests/xdp_devmap_attach.c        |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

-- 
2.35.1