From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, andrew@lunn.ch,
f.fainelli@gmail.com, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net v2 00/14] docs: update and move the netdev-FAQ
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 22:08:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220329050830.2755213-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
A section of documentation for tree-specific process quirks had
been created a while back. There's only one tree in it, so far,
the tip tree, but the contents seem to answer similar questions
as we answer in the netdev-FAQ. Move the netdev-FAQ.
Take this opportunity to touch up and update a few sections.
v2: remove non-git in patch 3
add patch 5
Jakub Kicinski (14):
docs: netdev: replace references to old archives
docs: netdev: minor reword
docs: netdev: move the patch marking section up
docs: netdev: turn the net-next closed into a Warning
docs: netdev: note that RFC postings are allowed any time
docs: netdev: shorten the name and mention msgid for patch status
docs: netdev: rephrase the 'Under review' question
docs: netdev: rephrase the 'should I update patchwork' question
docs: netdev: add a question about re-posting frequency
docs: netdev: make the testing requirement more stringent
docs: netdev: add missing back ticks
docs: netdev: call out the merge window in tag checking
docs: netdev: broaden the new vs old code formatting guidelines
docs: netdev: move the netdev-FAQ to the process pages
Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst | 2 +-
Documentation/networking/index.rst | 3 +-
.../process/maintainer-handbooks.rst | 1 +
.../maintainer-netdev.rst} | 114 +++++++++++-------
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
5 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
rename Documentation/{networking/netdev-FAQ.rst => process/maintainer-netdev.rst} (75%)
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-03-29 5:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-29 5:08 Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-03-29 5:08 ` [PATCH net v2 01/14] docs: netdev: replace references to old archives Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-30 3:30 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-03-29 5:08 ` [PATCH net v2 02/14] docs: netdev: minor reword Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-30 3:30 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-03-29 5:08 ` [PATCH net v2 03/14] docs: netdev: move the patch marking section up Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-29 12:52 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-03-30 3:30 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-03-29 5:08 ` [PATCH net v2 04/14] docs: netdev: turn the net-next closed into a Warning Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-30 3:30 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-03-29 5:08 ` [PATCH net v2 05/14] docs: netdev: note that RFC postings are allowed any time Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-29 12:53 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-03-30 3:31 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-03-29 5:08 ` [PATCH net v2 06/14] docs: netdev: shorten the name and mention msgid for patch status Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-30 3:31 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-03-29 5:08 ` [PATCH net v2 07/14] docs: netdev: rephrase the 'Under review' question Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-30 3:33 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-03-30 4:17 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-29 5:08 ` [PATCH net v2 08/14] docs: netdev: rephrase the 'should I update patchwork' question Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-29 5:08 ` [PATCH net v2 09/14] docs: netdev: add a question about re-posting frequency Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-30 3:33 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-03-29 5:08 ` [PATCH net v2 10/14] docs: netdev: make the testing requirement more stringent Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-30 3:34 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-03-29 5:08 ` [PATCH net v2 11/14] docs: netdev: add missing back ticks Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-30 3:34 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-03-29 5:08 ` [PATCH net v2 12/14] docs: netdev: call out the merge window in tag checking Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-30 3:34 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-03-29 5:08 ` [PATCH net v2 13/14] docs: netdev: broaden the new vs old code formatting guidelines Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-30 3:34 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-03-29 5:08 ` [PATCH net v2 14/14] docs: netdev: move the netdev-FAQ to the process pages Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-30 3:35 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220329050830.2755213-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).