bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<mcgrof@kernel.org>, <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	<rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/8] bpf_prog_pack followup
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 16:57:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220520235758.1858153-1-song@kernel.org> (raw)

Changes v3 => v4:
1. Shorten CC list on 4/8, so it is not dropped by the mail list.

Changes v2 => v3:
1. Fix issues reported by kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>.

Changes v1 => v2:
1. Add WARN to set_vm_flush_reset_perms() on huge pages. (Rick Edgecombe)
2. Simplify select_bpf_prog_pack_size. (Rick Edgecombe)

As of 5.18-rc6, x86_64 uses bpf_prog_pack on 4kB pages. This set contains
a few followups:
  1/8 - 3/8 fills unused part of bpf_prog_pack with illegal instructions.
  4/8 - 5/8 enables bpf_prog_pack on 2MB pages.

The primary goal of bpf_prog_pack is to reduce iTLB miss rate and reduce
direct memory mapping fragmentation. This leads to non-trivial performance
improvements.

For our web service production benchmark, bpf_prog_pack on 4kB pages
gives 0.5% to 0.7% more throughput than not using bpf_prog_pack.
bpf_prog_pack on 2MB pages 0.6% to 0.9% more throughput than not using
bpf_prog_pack. Note that 0.5% is a huge improvement for our fleet. I
believe this is also significant for other companies with many thousand
servers.

bpf_prog_pack on 2MB pages may use slightly more memory for systems
without many BPF programs. However, such waste in memory (<2MB) is within
noisy for modern x86_64 systems.

Song Liu (8):
  bpf: fill new bpf_prog_pack with illegal instructions
  x86/alternative: introduce text_poke_set
  bpf: introduce bpf_arch_text_invalidate for bpf_prog_pack
  module: introduce module_alloc_huge
  bpf: use module_alloc_huge for bpf_prog_pack
  vmalloc: WARN for set_vm_flush_reset_perms() on huge pages
  vmalloc: introduce huge_vmalloc_supported
  bpf: simplify select_bpf_prog_pack_size

 arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h |  1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c        | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 arch/x86/kernel/module.c             | 21 +++++++++
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c          |  5 +++
 include/linux/bpf.h                  |  1 +
 include/linux/moduleloader.h         |  5 +++
 include/linux/vmalloc.h              |  7 +++
 kernel/bpf/core.c                    | 43 ++++++++++--------
 kernel/module.c                      |  8 ++++
 mm/vmalloc.c                         |  5 +++
 10 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

--
2.30.2

             reply	other threads:[~2022-05-21  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-20 23:57 Song Liu [this message]
2022-05-20 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/8] bpf: fill new bpf_prog_pack with illegal instructions Song Liu
2022-05-20 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 2/8] x86/alternative: introduce text_poke_set Song Liu
2022-05-20 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 3/8] bpf: introduce bpf_arch_text_invalidate for bpf_prog_pack Song Liu
2022-05-24  7:20   ` Mike Rapoport
2022-05-20 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 4/8] module: introduce module_alloc_huge Song Liu
2022-05-20 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 5/8] bpf: use module_alloc_huge for bpf_prog_pack Song Liu
2022-05-24  7:22   ` Mike Rapoport
2022-05-24 16:42     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-06-17 23:05   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-05-20 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 6/8] vmalloc: WARN for set_vm_flush_reset_perms() on huge pages Song Liu
2022-05-20 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 7/8] vmalloc: introduce huge_vmalloc_supported Song Liu
2022-05-20 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 8/8] bpf: simplify select_bpf_prog_pack_size Song Liu
2022-05-23 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/8] bpf_prog_pack followup patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2022-06-20 11:11 ` Aaron Lu
2022-06-20 16:03   ` Song Liu
2022-06-21  1:31     ` Aaron Lu
2022-06-21  2:51       ` Song Liu
2022-06-21  3:25         ` Aaron Lu
2022-06-20 18:31   ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-06-21  1:45     ` Aaron Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220520235758.1858153-1-song@kernel.org \
    --to=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).