bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/4] Track processes properly for perf record --off-cpu (v2)
@ 2022-08-11 18:54 Namhyung Kim
  2022-08-11 18:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf offcpu: Check process id for the given workload Namhyung Kim
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2022-08-11 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Jiri Olsa
  Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML, Ian Rogers, linux-perf-users,
	Song Liu, Hao Luo, Blake Jones, Milian Wolff, bpf

Hello,

This patch series implements inheritance of offcpu events for the
child processes.  Unlike perf events, BPF cannot know which task it
should track except for ones set in a BPF map at the beginning.  Add
another BPF program to the fork path and add the process id to the map
if the parent is tracked.

Changes in v2)
 * drop already merged fixes
 * fix the shell test to omit noises
 
With this change, it can get the correct off-cpu events for child
processes.  I've tested it with perf bench sched messaging which
creates a lot of processes.

  $ sudo perf record -e dummy --off-cpu -- perf bench sched messaging
  # Running 'sched/messaging' benchmark:
  # 20 sender and receiver processes per group
  # 10 groups == 400 processes run

       Total time: 0.196 [sec]
  [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
  [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.178 MB perf.data (851 samples) ]


  $ sudo perf report --stat | grep -A1 offcpu
  offcpu-time stats:
            SAMPLE events:        851

The benchmark passes messages by read/write and it creates off-cpu
events.  With 400 processes, we can see more than 800 events.

The child process tracking is also enabled when -p option is given.
But -t option does NOT as it only cares about the specific threads.
It may be different what perf_event does now, but I think it makes
more sense.

You can get it from 'perf/offcpu-child-v2' branch in my tree

  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/namhyung/linux-perf.git

Thanks,
Namhyung


Namhyung Kim (4):
  perf offcpu: Check process id for the given workload
  perf offcpu: Parse process id separately
  perf offcpu: Track child processes
  perf offcpu: Update offcpu test for child process

 tools/perf/tests/shell/record_offcpu.sh | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
 tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c           | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/off_cpu.bpf.c  | 38 ++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)


base-commit: b39c9e1b101d2992de9981673919ae55a088792c
-- 
2.37.1.595.g718a3a8f04-goog


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/4] perf offcpu: Check process id for the given workload
  2022-08-11 18:54 [PATCH 0/4] Track processes properly for perf record --off-cpu (v2) Namhyung Kim
@ 2022-08-11 18:54 ` Namhyung Kim
  2022-08-11 18:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf offcpu: Parse process id separately Namhyung Kim
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2022-08-11 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Jiri Olsa
  Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML, Ian Rogers, linux-perf-users,
	Song Liu, Hao Luo, Blake Jones, Milian Wolff, bpf

Current task filter checks task->pid which is different for each
thread.  But we want to profile all the threads in the process.  So
let's compare process id (or thread-group id: tgid) instead.

Before:
  $ sudo perf record --off-cpu -- perf bench sched messaging -t
  $ sudo perf report --stat | grep -A1 offcpu
  offcpu-time stats:
            SAMPLE events:        2

After:
  $ sudo perf record --off-cpu -- perf bench sched messaging -t
  $ sudo perf report --stat | grep -A1 offcpu
  offcpu-time stats:
            SAMPLE events:      850

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c          | 1 +
 tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/off_cpu.bpf.c | 8 +++++++-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c
index f289b7713598..7dbcb025da87 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ static void off_cpu_start(void *arg)
 		u8 val = 1;
 
 		skel->bss->has_task = 1;
+		skel->bss->uses_tgid = 1;
 		fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.task_filter);
 		pid = perf_thread_map__pid(evlist->core.threads, 0);
 		bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &pid, &val, BPF_ANY);
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/off_cpu.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/off_cpu.bpf.c
index cc6d7fd55118..143a8b7acf87 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/off_cpu.bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/off_cpu.bpf.c
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ int enabled = 0;
 int has_cpu = 0;
 int has_task = 0;
 int has_cgroup = 0;
+int uses_tgid = 0;
 
 const volatile bool has_prev_state = false;
 const volatile bool needs_cgroup = false;
@@ -144,7 +145,12 @@ static inline int can_record(struct task_struct *t, int state)
 
 	if (has_task) {
 		__u8 *ok;
-		__u32 pid = t->pid;
+		__u32 pid;
+
+		if (uses_tgid)
+			pid = t->tgid;
+		else
+			pid = t->pid;
 
 		ok = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&task_filter, &pid);
 		if (!ok)
-- 
2.37.1.595.g718a3a8f04-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/4] perf offcpu: Parse process id separately
  2022-08-11 18:54 [PATCH 0/4] Track processes properly for perf record --off-cpu (v2) Namhyung Kim
  2022-08-11 18:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf offcpu: Check process id for the given workload Namhyung Kim
@ 2022-08-11 18:54 ` Namhyung Kim
  2022-08-11 18:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf offcpu: Track child processes Namhyung Kim
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2022-08-11 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Jiri Olsa
  Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML, Ian Rogers, linux-perf-users,
	Song Liu, Hao Luo, Blake Jones, Milian Wolff, bpf

The current target code uses thread id for tracking tasks because
perf_events need to be opened for each task.  But we can use tgid in
BPF maps and check it easily.

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c
index 7dbcb025da87..f7ee0c7a53f0 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 #include "util/cpumap.h"
 #include "util/thread_map.h"
 #include "util/cgroup.h"
+#include "util/strlist.h"
 #include <bpf/bpf.h>
 
 #include "bpf_skel/off_cpu.skel.h"
@@ -125,6 +126,8 @@ int off_cpu_prepare(struct evlist *evlist, struct target *target,
 {
 	int err, fd, i;
 	int ncpus = 1, ntasks = 1, ncgrps = 1;
+	struct strlist *pid_slist = NULL;
+	struct str_node *pos;
 
 	if (off_cpu_config(evlist) < 0) {
 		pr_err("Failed to config off-cpu BPF event\n");
@@ -143,7 +146,26 @@ int off_cpu_prepare(struct evlist *evlist, struct target *target,
 		bpf_map__set_max_entries(skel->maps.cpu_filter, ncpus);
 	}
 
-	if (target__has_task(target)) {
+	if (target->pid) {
+		pid_slist = strlist__new(target->pid, NULL);
+		if (!pid_slist) {
+			pr_err("Failed to create a strlist for pid\n");
+			return -1;
+		}
+
+		ntasks = 0;
+		strlist__for_each_entry(pos, pid_slist) {
+			char *end_ptr;
+			int pid = strtol(pos->s, &end_ptr, 10);
+
+			if (pid == INT_MIN || pid == INT_MAX ||
+			    (*end_ptr != '\0' && *end_ptr != ','))
+				continue;
+
+			ntasks++;
+		}
+		bpf_map__set_max_entries(skel->maps.task_filter, ntasks);
+	} else if (target__has_task(target)) {
 		ntasks = perf_thread_map__nr(evlist->core.threads);
 		bpf_map__set_max_entries(skel->maps.task_filter, ntasks);
 	}
@@ -185,7 +207,26 @@ int off_cpu_prepare(struct evlist *evlist, struct target *target,
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (target__has_task(target)) {
+	if (target->pid) {
+		u8 val = 1;
+
+		skel->bss->has_task = 1;
+		skel->bss->uses_tgid = 1;
+		fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.task_filter);
+
+		strlist__for_each_entry(pos, pid_slist) {
+			char *end_ptr;
+			u32 tgid;
+			int pid = strtol(pos->s, &end_ptr, 10);
+
+			if (pid == INT_MIN || pid == INT_MAX ||
+			    (*end_ptr != '\0' && *end_ptr != ','))
+				continue;
+
+			tgid = pid;
+			bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &tgid, &val, BPF_ANY);
+		}
+	} else if (target__has_task(target)) {
 		u32 pid;
 		u8 val = 1;
 
-- 
2.37.1.595.g718a3a8f04-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/4] perf offcpu: Track child processes
  2022-08-11 18:54 [PATCH 0/4] Track processes properly for perf record --off-cpu (v2) Namhyung Kim
  2022-08-11 18:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf offcpu: Check process id for the given workload Namhyung Kim
  2022-08-11 18:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf offcpu: Parse process id separately Namhyung Kim
@ 2022-08-11 18:54 ` Namhyung Kim
  2022-08-11 18:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf offcpu: Update offcpu test for child process Namhyung Kim
  2022-08-11 20:58 ` [PATCH 0/4] Track processes properly for perf record --off-cpu (v2) Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2022-08-11 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Jiri Olsa
  Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML, Ian Rogers, linux-perf-users,
	Song Liu, Hao Luo, Blake Jones, Milian Wolff, bpf

When -p option used or a workload is given, it needs to handle child
processes.  The perf_event can inherit those task events
automatically.  We can add a new BPF program in task_newtask
tracepoint to track child processes.

Before:
  $ sudo perf record --off-cpu -- perf bench sched messaging
  $ sudo perf report --stat | grep -A1 offcpu
  offcpu-time stats:
            SAMPLE events:        1

After:
  $ sudo perf record -a --off-cpu -- perf bench sched messaging
  $ sudo perf report --stat | grep -A1 offcpu
  offcpu-time stats:
            SAMPLE events:      856

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c          |  7 ++++++
 tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/off_cpu.bpf.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c
index f7ee0c7a53f0..c257813e674e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 #include "bpf_skel/off_cpu.skel.h"
 
 #define MAX_STACKS  32
+#define MAX_PROC  4096
 /* we don't need actual timestamp, just want to put the samples at last */
 #define OFF_CPU_TIMESTAMP  (~0ull << 32)
 
@@ -164,10 +165,16 @@ int off_cpu_prepare(struct evlist *evlist, struct target *target,
 
 			ntasks++;
 		}
+
+		if (ntasks < MAX_PROC)
+			ntasks = MAX_PROC;
+
 		bpf_map__set_max_entries(skel->maps.task_filter, ntasks);
 	} else if (target__has_task(target)) {
 		ntasks = perf_thread_map__nr(evlist->core.threads);
 		bpf_map__set_max_entries(skel->maps.task_filter, ntasks);
+	} else if (target__none(target)) {
+		bpf_map__set_max_entries(skel->maps.task_filter, MAX_PROC);
 	}
 
 	if (evlist__first(evlist)->cgrp) {
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/off_cpu.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/off_cpu.bpf.c
index 143a8b7acf87..c4ba2bcf179f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/off_cpu.bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/off_cpu.bpf.c
@@ -12,6 +12,9 @@
 #define TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE	0x0001
 #define TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE	0x0002
 
+/* create a new thread */
+#define CLONE_THREAD  0x10000
+
 #define MAX_STACKS   32
 #define MAX_ENTRIES  102400
 
@@ -220,6 +223,33 @@ static int off_cpu_stat(u64 *ctx, struct task_struct *prev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+int on_newtask(u64 *ctx)
+{
+	struct task_struct *task;
+	u64 clone_flags;
+	u32 pid;
+	u8 val = 1;
+
+	if (!uses_tgid)
+		return 0;
+
+	task = (struct task_struct *)bpf_get_current_task();
+
+	pid = BPF_CORE_READ(task, tgid);
+	if (!bpf_map_lookup_elem(&task_filter, &pid))
+		return 0;
+
+	task = (struct task_struct *)ctx[0];
+	clone_flags = ctx[1];
+
+	pid = task->tgid;
+	if (!(clone_flags & CLONE_THREAD))
+		bpf_map_update_elem(&task_filter, &pid, &val, BPF_NOEXIST);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 SEC("tp_btf/sched_switch")
 int on_switch(u64 *ctx)
 {
-- 
2.37.1.595.g718a3a8f04-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] perf offcpu: Update offcpu test for child process
  2022-08-11 18:54 [PATCH 0/4] Track processes properly for perf record --off-cpu (v2) Namhyung Kim
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-08-11 18:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf offcpu: Track child processes Namhyung Kim
@ 2022-08-11 18:54 ` Namhyung Kim
  2022-08-11 20:58 ` [PATCH 0/4] Track processes properly for perf record --off-cpu (v2) Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2022-08-11 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Jiri Olsa
  Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML, Ian Rogers, linux-perf-users,
	Song Liu, Hao Luo, Blake Jones, Milian Wolff, bpf

Record off-cpu data with perf bench sched messaging workload and count
the number of offcpu-time events.  Also update the test script not to
run next tests if failed already and revise the error messages.

  $ sudo ./perf test offcpu -v
   88: perf record offcpu profiling tests                              :
  --- start ---
  test child forked, pid 344780
  Checking off-cpu privilege
  Basic off-cpu test
  Basic off-cpu test [Success]
  Child task off-cpu test
  Child task off-cpu test [Success]
  test child finished with 0
  ---- end ----
  perf record offcpu profiling tests: Ok

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/tests/shell/record_offcpu.sh | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record_offcpu.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record_offcpu.sh
index 96e0739f7478..d2eba583a2ac 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record_offcpu.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record_offcpu.sh
@@ -19,20 +19,26 @@ trap_cleanup() {
 }
 trap trap_cleanup exit term int
 
-test_offcpu() {
-  echo "Basic off-cpu test"
+test_offcpu_priv() {
+  echo "Checking off-cpu privilege"
+
   if [ `id -u` != 0 ]
   then
-    echo "Basic off-cpu test [Skipped permission]"
+    echo "off-cpu test [Skipped permission]"
     err=2
     return
   fi
-  if perf record --off-cpu -o ${perfdata} --quiet true 2>&1 | grep BUILD_BPF_SKEL
+  if perf record --off-cpu -o /dev/null --quiet true 2>&1 | grep BUILD_BPF_SKEL
   then
-    echo "Basic off-cpu test [Skipped missing BPF support]"
+    echo "off-cpu test [Skipped missing BPF support]"
     err=2
     return
   fi
+}
+
+test_offcpu_basic() {
+  echo "Basic off-cpu test"
+
   if ! perf record --off-cpu -e dummy -o ${perfdata} sleep 1 2> /dev/null
   then
     echo "Basic off-cpu test [Failed record]"
@@ -41,7 +47,7 @@ test_offcpu() {
   fi
   if ! perf evlist -i ${perfdata} | grep -q "offcpu-time"
   then
-    echo "Basic off-cpu test [Failed record]"
+    echo "Basic off-cpu test [Failed no event]"
     err=1
     return
   fi
@@ -54,7 +60,44 @@ test_offcpu() {
   echo "Basic off-cpu test [Success]"
 }
 
-test_offcpu
+test_offcpu_child() {
+  echo "Child task off-cpu test"
+
+  # perf bench sched messaging creates 400 processes
+  if ! perf record --off-cpu -e dummy -o ${perfdata} -- \
+    perf bench sched messaging -g 10 > /dev/null 2&>1
+  then
+    echo "Child task off-cpu test [Failed record]"
+    err=1
+    return
+  fi
+  if ! perf evlist -i ${perfdata} | grep -q "offcpu-time"
+  then
+    echo "Child task off-cpu test [Failed no event]"
+    err=1
+    return
+  fi
+  # each process waits for read and write, so it should be more than 800 events
+  if ! perf report -i ${perfdata} -s comm -q -n -t ';' --percent-limit=90 | \
+    awk -F ";" '{ if (NF > 3 && int($3) < 800) exit 1; }'
+  then
+    echo "Child task off-cpu test [Failed invalid output]"
+    err=1
+    return
+  fi
+  echo "Child task off-cpu test [Success]"
+}
+
+
+test_offcpu_priv
+
+if [ $err = 0 ]; then
+  test_offcpu_basic
+fi
+
+if [ $err = 0 ]; then
+  test_offcpu_child
+fi
 
 cleanup
 exit $err
-- 
2.37.1.595.g718a3a8f04-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/4] Track processes properly for perf record --off-cpu (v2)
  2022-08-11 18:54 [PATCH 0/4] Track processes properly for perf record --off-cpu (v2) Namhyung Kim
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-08-11 18:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf offcpu: Update offcpu test for child process Namhyung Kim
@ 2022-08-11 20:58 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2022-08-11 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Namhyung Kim
  Cc: Jiri Olsa, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML, Ian Rogers,
	linux-perf-users, Song Liu, Hao Luo, Blake Jones, Milian Wolff,
	bpf

Em Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 11:54:52AM -0700, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Hello,
> 
> This patch series implements inheritance of offcpu events for the
> child processes.  Unlike perf events, BPF cannot know which task it
> should track except for ones set in a BPF map at the beginning.  Add
> another BPF program to the fork path and add the process id to the map
> if the parent is tracked.

Thanks for resubmitting, applied!

Will be up in perf/core as soon as tests finish.

- Arnaldo
 
> Changes in v2)
>  * drop already merged fixes
>  * fix the shell test to omit noises
>  
> With this change, it can get the correct off-cpu events for child
> processes.  I've tested it with perf bench sched messaging which
> creates a lot of processes.
> 
>   $ sudo perf record -e dummy --off-cpu -- perf bench sched messaging
>   # Running 'sched/messaging' benchmark:
>   # 20 sender and receiver processes per group
>   # 10 groups == 400 processes run
> 
>        Total time: 0.196 [sec]
>   [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
>   [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.178 MB perf.data (851 samples) ]
> 
> 
>   $ sudo perf report --stat | grep -A1 offcpu
>   offcpu-time stats:
>             SAMPLE events:        851
> 
> The benchmark passes messages by read/write and it creates off-cpu
> events.  With 400 processes, we can see more than 800 events.
> 
> The child process tracking is also enabled when -p option is given.
> But -t option does NOT as it only cares about the specific threads.
> It may be different what perf_event does now, but I think it makes
> more sense.
> 
> You can get it from 'perf/offcpu-child-v2' branch in my tree
> 
>   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/namhyung/linux-perf.git
> 
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
> 
> 
> Namhyung Kim (4):
>   perf offcpu: Check process id for the given workload
>   perf offcpu: Parse process id separately
>   perf offcpu: Track child processes
>   perf offcpu: Update offcpu test for child process
> 
>  tools/perf/tests/shell/record_offcpu.sh | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c           | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/off_cpu.bpf.c  | 38 ++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> base-commit: b39c9e1b101d2992de9981673919ae55a088792c
> -- 
> 2.37.1.595.g718a3a8f04-goog

-- 

- Arnaldo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-08-11 20:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-08-11 18:54 [PATCH 0/4] Track processes properly for perf record --off-cpu (v2) Namhyung Kim
2022-08-11 18:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf offcpu: Check process id for the given workload Namhyung Kim
2022-08-11 18:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf offcpu: Parse process id separately Namhyung Kim
2022-08-11 18:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf offcpu: Track child processes Namhyung Kim
2022-08-11 18:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf offcpu: Update offcpu test for child process Namhyung Kim
2022-08-11 20:58 ` [PATCH 0/4] Track processes properly for perf record --off-cpu (v2) Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).