bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] libbpf: fix null-pointer dereference in find_prog_by_sec_insn()
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 10:23:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221012022353.7350-4-shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221012022353.7350-1-shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>

When there are no program sections, obj->programs is left unallocated,
and find_prog_by_sec_insn()'s search lands on &obj->programs[0] == NULL,
and will cause null-pointer dereference in the following access to
prog->sec_idx.

Guard the search with obj->nr_programs similar to what's being done in
__bpf_program__iter() to prevent null-pointer access from happening.

Fixes: db2b8b06423c ("libbpf: Support CO-RE relocations for multi-prog sections")
Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 29e9df0c232b..8c3f236c86e4 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -4115,6 +4115,9 @@ static struct bpf_program *find_prog_by_sec_insn(const struct bpf_object *obj,
 	int l = 0, r = obj->nr_programs - 1, m;
 	struct bpf_program *prog;

+	if (!obj->nr_programs)
+		return NULL;
+
 	while (l < r) {
 		m = l + (r - l + 1) / 2;
 		prog = &obj->programs[m];
--
2.37.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-12  2:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-12  2:23 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] libbpf: fix fuzzer-reported issues Shung-Hsi Yu
2022-10-12  2:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] libbpf: use elf_getshdrnum() instead of e_shnum Shung-Hsi Yu
2022-10-12  2:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] libbpf: deal with section with no data gracefully Shung-Hsi Yu
2022-10-12  2:23 ` Shung-Hsi Yu [this message]
2022-10-13 16:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] libbpf: fix fuzzer-reported issues patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221012022353.7350-4-shung-hsi.yu@suse.com \
    --to=shung-hsi.yu@suse.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).