From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FB4C64ED6 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2023 15:51:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230017AbjCAPvA (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2023 10:51:00 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43024 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229620AbjCAPu4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2023 10:50:56 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com (mail-pg1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B79CD457D1; Wed, 1 Mar 2023 07:50:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id p6so8011141pga.0; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 07:50:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1677685855; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=faJ7mc6oUHrWjyXNkw+7M0lLdt4KdopPLj9GK5dJLQ4=; b=VfjpdNYz2/0AH/9CFXXWjWYMVdBwCRZsaEyuZRrzhgxq/MSjeB5duIj4SK4NFeDyO4 ALCfQKrxu2H4YBzn0TQXYKgMsCcItFGHUmB+KDPwjWSYTiGZbX2rdGAUP4jxdDGPo+dc OFaq2z/CoLgEVFfYcDDQPSO+DvSuDfYQvZoi/NTI3rgIj3Pn1iYt0zRYegO/u+WXTwp4 pn90VsDIDS2fe4O02zE9mB4lOrfFzwSZIsYPXVwMbTPOHUjarY6waIvvA06AHliSdvst jx/VQ/K7y21EqAUcONabnbYKVBPJrT7uzyTVFblj3DKyBhC2kBG+J7hthBGCV1rH5NIV FIjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1677685855; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=faJ7mc6oUHrWjyXNkw+7M0lLdt4KdopPLj9GK5dJLQ4=; b=aQ6DPQA1ItncIn/qfEeIs0mV3pwBk7uwOALqB3wYsyZwD7KklDdiLxFMxI/tyA/Ibf pYC0ZvxBnfLHcHf+yn3gysLXuQlrVBhSThybaIf2YYOB+q3eh8YPAWq27jh9HsjPao/L qL17JS7ogrspqjVC/NQdVT1DVci632ZOSEREk6fHKI1vQDcaeLbWLGJ8VdpnBYs4cK2W zSNX2TXomvOylOxNX0rEAVXI09SfdVfKsj3qbWm1HH4uzHGlc7iPqeTpg+N7tJP91iRB H/ZZlx82uyvn6sBBmlbD9mxIIe1AUrITxUp5D45hast5m5ZUNpMik4yCbcNPhZpP5YsQ mscg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWu0TzM6+FLY0O0zpWfUKl/t8flx44n2BVBQoV4Bsdl/wPRV9yA LR+fB6Cr2bRTAnO9wQ293QUZ0HAtpCg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/vh1mKlCXvIhK+lToen1hsDwejDVcoe1pEmedRIU7g1WSeQX6s91lM2cMPEln9a8hJ6e8oJw== X-Received: by 2002:a62:6586:0:b0:5a8:5e6d:28d7 with SMTP id z128-20020a626586000000b005a85e6d28d7mr6867420pfb.0.1677685854774; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 07:50:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from gatsby.corp.tfbnw.net (75-172-126-232.tukw.qwest.net. [75.172.126.232]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c9-20020a637249000000b00502f20aa4desm7589490pgn.70.2023.03.01.07.50.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 01 Mar 2023 07:50:54 -0800 (PST) From: Joanne Koong To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: martin.lau@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, memxor@gmail.com, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, toke@kernel.org, Joanne Koong Subject: [PATCH v13 bpf-next 02/10] bpf: Refactor process_dynptr_func Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 07:49:45 -0800 Message-Id: <20230301154953.641654-3-joannelkoong@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20230301154953.641654-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com> References: <20230301154953.641654-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org This change cleans up process_dynptr_func's flow to be more intuitive and updates some comments with more context. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong --- include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 3 -- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h index cf1bb1cf4a7b..b26ff2a8f63b 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h @@ -616,9 +616,6 @@ int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, enum bpf_arg_type arg_type); int check_mem_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg, u32 regno, u32 mem_size); -struct bpf_call_arg_meta; -int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, - enum bpf_arg_type arg_type, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta); /* this lives here instead of in bpf.h because it needs to dereference tgt_prog */ static inline u64 bpf_trampoline_compute_key(const struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog, diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 5cb8b623f639..e0e00509846b 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -959,39 +959,49 @@ static int destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return 0; } -static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg, - int spi) +static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { + int spi; + if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) return false; - /* For -ERANGE (i.e. spi not falling into allocated stack slots), we - * will do check_mem_access to check and update stack bounds later, so - * return true for that case. + spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); + + /* -ERANGE (i.e. spi not falling into allocated stack slots) isn't an + * error because this just means the stack state hasn't been updated yet. + * We will do check_mem_access to check and update stack bounds later. */ - if (spi < 0) - return spi == -ERANGE; - /* We allow overwriting existing unreferenced STACK_DYNPTR slots, see - * mark_stack_slots_dynptr which calls destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot to - * ensure dynptr objects at the slots we are touching are completely - * destructed before we reinitialize them for a new one. For referenced - * ones, destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot returns an error early instead of - * delaying it until the end where the user will get "Unreleased + if (spi < 0 && spi != -ERANGE) + return false; + + /* We don't need to check if the stack slots are marked by previous + * dynptr initializations because we allow overwriting existing unreferenced + * STACK_DYNPTR slots, see mark_stack_slots_dynptr which calls + * destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot to ensure dynptr objects at the slots we are + * touching are completely destructed before we reinitialize them for a new + * one. For referenced ones, destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot returns an error early + * instead of delaying it until the end where the user will get "Unreleased * reference" error. */ return true; } -static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg, - int spi) +static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg); - int i; + int i, spi; - /* This already represents first slot of initialized bpf_dynptr */ + /* This already represents first slot of initialized bpf_dynptr. + * + * CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR already has fixed and var_off as 0 due to + * check_func_arg_reg_off's logic, so we don't need to check its + * offset and alignment. + */ if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) return true; + spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); if (spi < 0) return false; if (!state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.first_slot) @@ -6215,11 +6225,10 @@ static int process_kptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, * Helpers which do not mutate the bpf_dynptr set MEM_RDONLY in their argument * type, and declare it as 'const struct bpf_dynptr *' in their prototype. */ -int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, - enum bpf_arg_type arg_type, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta) +static int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, + enum bpf_arg_type arg_type, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta) { struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *reg = ®s[regno]; - int spi = 0; /* MEM_UNINIT and MEM_RDONLY are exclusive, when applied to an * ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR (or ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | DYNPTR_TYPE_*): @@ -6228,15 +6237,6 @@ int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, verbose(env, "verifier internal error: misconfigured dynptr helper type flags\n"); return -EFAULT; } - /* CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR already has fixed and var_off as 0 due to - * check_func_arg_reg_off's logic. We only need to check offset - * and its alignment for PTR_TO_STACK. - */ - if (reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) { - spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); - if (spi < 0 && spi != -ERANGE) - return spi; - } /* MEM_UNINIT - Points to memory that is an appropriate candidate for * constructing a mutable bpf_dynptr object. @@ -6254,7 +6254,7 @@ int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, * to. */ if (arg_type & MEM_UNINIT) { - if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(env, reg, spi)) { + if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(env, reg)) { verbose(env, "Dynptr has to be an uninitialized dynptr\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -6277,7 +6277,7 @@ int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, return -EINVAL; } - if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(env, reg, spi)) { + if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(env, reg)) { verbose(env, "Expected an initialized dynptr as arg #%d\n", regno); -- 2.34.1