bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rhys Rustad-Elliott <me@rhysre.net>
Cc: me@rhysre.net, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Fix elem_size not being set for inner maps
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:08:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230601000713.506358-1-me@rhysre.net> (raw)

Commit d937bc3449fa ("bpf: make uniform use of array->elem_size
everywhere in arraymap.c") changed array_map_gen_lookup to use
array->elem_size instead of round_up(map->value_size, 8) as the element
size when generating code to access a value in an array map.

array->elem_size, however, is not set by bpf_map_meta_alloc when
initializing an BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS or BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS.
This results in array_map_gen_lookup incorrectly outputting code that
always accesses index 0 in the array (as the index will be calculated
via a multiplication with the element size, which is incorrectly set to
0).

Set elem_size on the bpf_array object when allocating an array or hash
of maps and add a selftest that accesses an inner map at a nonzero index
to prevent regressions.

Fixes: d937bc3449fa ("bpf: make uniform use of array->elem_size everywhere in arraymap.c")
Signed-off-by: Rhys Rustad-Elliott <me@rhysre.net>
---
 kernel/bpf/map_in_map.c                       |  8 +++-
 .../map_in_map_inner_array_lookup.c           | 33 ++++++++++++++
 .../test_map_in_map_inner_array_lookup.c      | 45 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_in_map_inner_array_lookup.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_map_in_map_inner_array_lookup.c

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/map_in_map.c b/kernel/bpf/map_in_map.c
index 2c5c64c2a53b..8d65b12e0834 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/map_in_map.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/map_in_map.c
@@ -69,9 +69,13 @@ struct bpf_map *bpf_map_meta_alloc(int inner_map_ufd)
 	/* Misc members not needed in bpf_map_meta_equal() check. */
 	inner_map_meta->ops = inner_map->ops;
 	if (inner_map->ops == &array_map_ops) {
+		struct bpf_array *inner_array_meta =
+			container_of(inner_map_meta, struct bpf_array, map);
+		struct bpf_array *inner_array = container_of(inner_map, struct bpf_array, map);
+
+		inner_array_meta->index_mask = inner_array->index_mask;
+		inner_array_meta->elem_size = round_up(inner_map->value_size, 8);
 		inner_map_meta->bypass_spec_v1 = inner_map->bypass_spec_v1;
-		container_of(inner_map_meta, struct bpf_array, map)->index_mask =
-		     container_of(inner_map, struct bpf_array, map)->index_mask;
 	}
 
 	fdput(f);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_in_map_inner_array_lookup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_in_map_inner_array_lookup.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..264d4788e5fd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_in_map_inner_array_lookup.c
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+
+#include "test_map_in_map_inner_array_lookup.skel.h"
+
+static int duration;
+
+void test_map_in_map_inner_array_lookup(void)
+{
+	int map1_fd, err;
+	int key = 3;
+	int val = 1;
+	struct test_map_in_map_inner_array_lookup *skel;
+
+	skel = test_map_in_map_inner_array_lookup__open_and_load();
+	if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open", "failed to open&load skeleton\n"))
+		return;
+
+	err = test_map_in_map_inner_array_lookup__attach(skel);
+	if (CHECK(err, "skel_attach", "skeleton attach failed: %d\n", err))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	map1_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
+	bpf_map_update_elem(map1_fd, &key, &val, 0);
+	usleep(1);
+	/* Probe should have set the element at index 3 to 2 */
+	bpf_map_lookup_elem(map1_fd, &key, &val);
+	CHECK(val != 2, "inner1", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 2);
+
+cleanup:
+	test_map_in_map_inner_array_lookup__destroy(skel);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_map_in_map_inner_array_lookup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_map_in_map_inner_array_lookup.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c2c8f2fa451d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_map_in_map_inner_array_lookup.c
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+struct inner_map {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+	__uint(max_entries, 5);
+	__type(key, int);
+	__type(value, int);
+} inner_map1 SEC(".maps");
+
+struct outer_map {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS);
+	__uint(max_entries, 3);
+	__type(key, int);
+	__array(values, struct inner_map);
+} outer_map1 SEC(".maps") = {
+	.values = {
+		[2] = &inner_map1,
+	},
+};
+
+SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter")
+int handle__sys_enter(void *ctx)
+{
+	int outer_key = 2, inner_key = 3;
+	int *val;
+	void *map;
+
+	map = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&outer_map1, &outer_key);
+	if (!map)
+		return 1;
+
+	val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &inner_key);
+	if (!val)
+		return 1;
+
+	if (*val == 1)
+		*val = 2;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.40.1



             reply	other threads:[~2023-06-01  0:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-01  0:08 Rhys Rustad-Elliott [this message]
2023-06-01 19:18 ` [PATCH bpf] bpf: Fix elem_size not being set for inner maps Martin KaFai Lau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230601000713.506358-1-me@rhysre.net \
    --to=me@rhysre.net \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).