bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com>
To: x86@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xingwei lee <xrivendell7@gmail.com>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	houtao1@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2 0/3] Fix the read of vsyscall page through bpf
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 19:54:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240126115423.3943360-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com> (raw)

From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>

Hi,

As reported by syzboot [1] and [2], when trying to read vsyscall page
by using bpf_probe_read_kernel() or bpf_probe_read(), oops may happen.

Thomas Gleixner had proposed a test patch [3], but it seems that no
formal patch is posted after about one month [4], so I post it instead
and add an Originally-by tag in patch #2.

Patch #1 makes is_vsyscall_vaddr() being a common helper. Patch #2 fixes
the problem by disallowing vsyscall page read for
copy_from_kernel_nofault(). Patch #3 adds one test case to ensure the
read of vsyscall page through bpf is rejected. Please see individual
patches for more details.

Comments are always welcome.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAG48ez06TZft=ATH1qh2c5mpS5BT8UakwNkzi6nvK5_djC-4Nw@mail.gmail.com/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CABOYnLynjBoFZOf3Z4BhaZkc5hx_kHfsjiW+UWLoB=w33LvScw@mail.gmail.com/
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/87r0jwquhv.ffs@tglx/
[4]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/e24b125c-8ff4-9031-6c53-67ff2e01f316@huaweicloud.com/

Change Log:
v2:
  * move is_vsyscall_vaddr to asm/vsyscall.h instead (Sohil)
  * elaborate on the reason for disallowing of vsyscall page read in
    copy_from_kernel_nofault_allowed() (Sohil)
  * update the commit message of patch #2 to more clearly explain how
    the oops occurs. (Sohil)
  * update the commit message of patch #3 to explain the expected return
    values of various bpf helpers (Yonghong)

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240119073019.1528573-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/

Hou Tao (3):
  x86/mm: Move is_vsyscall_vaddr() into asm/vsyscall.h
  x86/mm: Disallow vsyscall page read for copy_from_kernel_nofault()
  selftest/bpf: Test the read of vsyscall page under x86-64

 arch/x86/include/asm/vsyscall.h               | 10 ++++
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c                           |  9 ---
 arch/x86/mm/maccess.c                         |  9 +++
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/read_vsyscall.c  | 57 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/read_vsyscall.c       | 45 +++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/read_vsyscall.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/read_vsyscall.c

-- 
2.29.2


             reply	other threads:[~2024-01-26 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-26 11:54 Hou Tao [this message]
2024-01-26 11:54 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/3] x86/mm: Move is_vsyscall_vaddr() into asm/vsyscall.h Hou Tao
2024-01-29 23:56   ` Sohil Mehta
2024-01-30  4:20     ` Hou Tao
2024-01-26 11:54 ` [PATCH bpf v2 2/3] x86/mm: Disallow vsyscall page read for copy_from_kernel_nofault() Hou Tao
2024-01-29 23:50   ` Sohil Mehta
2024-01-30  4:18     ` Hou Tao
2024-01-26 11:54 ` [PATCH bpf v2 3/3] selftest/bpf: Test the read of vsyscall page under x86-64 Hou Tao
2024-01-26 19:36   ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240126115423.3943360-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=houtao@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xrivendell7@gmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).