bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	kernel-team@fb.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev, void@manifault.com,
	sinquersw@gmail.com, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/15] libbpf: type suffixes and autocreate flag for struct_ops maps
Date: Tue,  5 Mar 2024 00:51:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240304225156.24765-1-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)

Tweak struct_ops related APIs to allow the following features:
- specify version suffixes for stuct_ops map types;
- share same BPF program between several map definitions with
  different local BTF types, assuming only maps with same
  kernel BTF type would be selected for load;
- toggle autocreate flag for struct_ops maps;
- automatically toggle autoload for struct_ops programs referenced
  from struct_ops maps, depending on autocreate status of the
  corresponding map;
- use SEC("?.struct_ops") and SEC("?.struct_ops.link")
  to define struct_ops maps with autocreate == false after object open.

This would allow loading programs like below:

    SEC("struct_ops/foo") int BPF_PROG(foo) { ... }
    SEC("struct_ops/bar") int BPF_PROG(bar) { ... }

    struct bpf_testmod_ops___v1 {
        int (*foo)(void);
    };

    struct bpf_testmod_ops___v2 {
        int (*foo)(void);
        int (*bar)(void);
    };

    /* Assume kernel type name to be 'test_ops' */
    SEC(".struct_ops.link")
    struct test_ops___v1 map_v1 = {
        /* Program 'foo' shared by maps with
         * different local BTF type
         */
        .foo = (void *)foo
    };

    SEC(".struct_ops.link")
    struct test_ops___v2 map_v2 = {
        .foo = (void *)foo,
        .bar = (void *)bar
    };

Assuming the following tweaks are done before loading:

    /* to load v1 */
    bpf_map__set_autocreate(skel->maps.map_v1, true);
    bpf_map__set_autocreate(skel->maps.map_v2, false);

    /* to load v2 */
    bpf_map__set_autocreate(skel->maps.map_v1, false);
    bpf_map__set_autocreate(skel->maps.map_v2, true);

Patch #8 ties autocreate and autoload flags for struct_ops maps and
programs.

Changelog:
- v2 [2] -> v3:
  - moved patch #8 logic to be fully done on load
    (requested by Andrii in offlist discussion);
  - in patch #9 added test case for shadow vars and
    autocreate/autoload interaction.
- v1 [1] -> v2:
  - fixed memory leak in patch #1 (Kui-Feng);
  - improved error messages in patch #2 (Martin, Andrii);
  - in bad_struct_ops selftest from patch #6 added .test_2
    map member setup (David);
  - added utility functions to capture libbpf log from selftests (David)
  - in selftests replaced usage of ...__open_and_load by separate
    calls to ..._open() and ..._load() (Andrii);
  - removed serial_... in selftest definitions (Andrii);
  - improved comments in selftest struct_ops_autocreate
    from patch #7 (David);
  - removed autoload toggling logic incompatible with shadow variables
    from bpf_map__set_autocreate(), instead struct_ops programs
    autoload property is computed at struct_ops maps load phase,
    see patch #8 (Kui-Feng, Martin, Andrii);
  - added support for SEC("?.struct_ops") and SEC("?.struct_ops.link")
    (Andrii).

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240227204556.17524-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240302011920.15302-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/

Eduard Zingerman (15):
  libbpf: allow version suffixes (___smth) for struct_ops types
  libbpf: tie struct_ops programs to kernel BTF ids, not to local ids
  libbpf: honor autocreate flag for struct_ops maps
  selftests/bpf: test struct_ops map definition with type suffix
  selftests/bpf: utility functions to capture libbpf log in test_progs
  selftests/bpf: bad_struct_ops test
  selftests/bpf: test autocreate behavior for struct_ops maps
  libbpf: sync progs autoload with maps autocreate for struct_ops maps
  selftests/bpf: verify struct_ops autoload/autocreate sync
  libbpf: replace elf_state->st_ops_* fields with SEC_ST_OPS sec_type
  libbpf: struct_ops in SEC("?.struct_ops") and SEC("?.struct_ops.link")
  libbpf: rewrite btf datasec names starting from '?'
  selftests/bpf: test case for SEC("?.struct_ops")
  bpf: allow '?' at the beginning of DATASEC names
  selftests/bpf: test cases for '?' in BTF names

 kernel/bpf/btf.c                              |  17 +-
 tools/lib/bpf/features.c                      |  22 ++
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                        | 214 +++++++++++++-----
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h               |   2 +
 .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c   |  25 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h   |   4 +
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bad_struct_ops.c |  67 ++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c  |  46 ++++
 .../bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_autocreate.c    | 157 +++++++++++++
 .../bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c   |  33 ++-
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/bad_struct_ops.c      |  25 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/bad_struct_ops2.c     |  14 ++
 .../bpf/progs/struct_ops_autocreate.c         |  52 +++++
 .../bpf/progs/struct_ops_autocreate2.c        |  32 +++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c   |  21 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c      |  57 +++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h      |   3 +
 17 files changed, 717 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bad_struct_ops.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_autocreate.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bad_struct_ops.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bad_struct_ops2.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_autocreate.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_autocreate2.c

-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-03-04 22:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-04 22:51 Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-03-04 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/15] libbpf: allow version suffixes (___smth) for struct_ops types Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-05 19:12   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-04 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/15] libbpf: tie struct_ops programs to kernel BTF ids, not to local ids Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-05 19:15   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-04 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/15] libbpf: honor autocreate flag for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-05 19:19   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-05 23:50     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-04 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/15] selftests/bpf: test struct_ops map definition with type suffix Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-04 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/15] selftests/bpf: utility functions to capture libbpf log in test_progs Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-05 19:24   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-05 23:58     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-04 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/15] selftests/bpf: bad_struct_ops test Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-05 19:29   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-06  0:05     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-04 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/15] selftests/bpf: test autocreate behavior for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-05  9:51   ` Daniel Borkmann
2024-03-05  9:54     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-04 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/15] libbpf: sync progs autoload with maps autocreate " Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-05 19:46   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-06  0:28     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-04 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/15] selftests/bpf: verify struct_ops autoload/autocreate sync Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-05 19:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-06  0:40     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-04 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/15] libbpf: replace elf_state->st_ops_* fields with SEC_ST_OPS sec_type Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-05 19:53   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-06  1:08     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-04 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/15] libbpf: struct_ops in SEC("?.struct_ops") and SEC("?.struct_ops.link") Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-05 19:55   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-06  1:18     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-04 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/15] libbpf: rewrite btf datasec names starting from '?' Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-05 20:03   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-06  1:34     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-04 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/15] selftests/bpf: test case for SEC("?.struct_ops") Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-05 21:40   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-04 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/15] bpf: allow '?' at the beginning of DATASEC names Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-05 21:43   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-06  2:04     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-04 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/15] selftests/bpf: test cases for '?' in BTF names Eduard Zingerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240304225156.24765-1-eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).