bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aditi Ghag <aditi.ghag@isovalent.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, kafai@fb.com, edumazet@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_sock_destroy
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 16:13:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <30733F2E-2CEB-4004-9970-FA791988F887@isovalent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKH8qBtYvsvjruNdznYq-Bkr-FjJoazx71_f=hph21B6_09-oA@mail.gmail.com>



> On Mar 28, 2023, at 11:35 AM, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 10:51 AM Aditi Ghag <aditi.ghag@isovalent.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 27, 2023, at 9:54 AM, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 03/27, Aditi Ghag wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 24, 2023, at 2:52 PM, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 03/23, Aditi Ghag wrote:
>>>>>> The test cases for destroying sockets mirror the intended usages of the
>>>>>> bpf_sock_destroy kfunc using iterators.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> The destroy helpers set `ECONNABORTED` error code that we can validate in
>>>>>> the test code with client sockets. But UDP sockets have an overriding error
>>>>>> code from the disconnect called during abort, so the error code the
>>>>>> validation is only done for TCP sockets.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Aditi Ghag <aditi.ghag@isovalent.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c   | 195 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> .../selftests/bpf/progs/sock_destroy_prog.c   | 151 ++++++++++++++
>>>>>> 2 files changed, 346 insertions(+)
>>>>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c
>>>>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_destroy_prog.c
>>>>> 
>>>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c
>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>> index 000000000000..cbce966af568
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
>>>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>>>> +#include <test_progs.h>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +#include "sock_destroy_prog.skel.h"
>>>>>> +#include "network_helpers.h"
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +#define SERVER_PORT 6062
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +static void start_iter_sockets(struct bpf_program *prog)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + struct bpf_link *link;
>>>>>> + char buf[50] = {};
>>>>>> + int iter_fd, len;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + link = bpf_program__attach_iter(prog, NULL);
>>>>>> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_iter"))
>>>>>> +         return;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + iter_fd = bpf_iter_create(bpf_link__fd(link));
>>>>>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(iter_fd, 0, "create_iter"))
>>>>>> +         goto free_link;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
>>>>>> +         ;
>>>>>> + ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read");
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + close(iter_fd);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +free_link:
>>>>>> + bpf_link__destroy(link);
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +static void test_tcp_client(struct sock_destroy_prog *skel)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + int serv = -1, clien = -1, n = 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + serv = start_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, NULL, 0, 0);
>>>>>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(serv, 0, "start_server"))
>>>>>> +         goto cleanup_serv;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + clien = connect_to_fd(serv, 0);
>>>>>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(clien, 0, "connect_to_fd"))
>>>>>> +         goto cleanup_serv;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + serv = accept(serv, NULL, NULL);
>>>>>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(serv, 0, "serv accept"))
>>>>>> +         goto cleanup;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + n = send(clien, "t", 1, 0);
>>>>>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(n, 0, "client send"))
>>>>>> +         goto cleanup;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /* Run iterator program that destroys connected client sockets. */
>>>>>> + start_iter_sockets(skel->progs.iter_tcp6_client);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + n = send(clien, "t", 1, 0);
>>>>>> + if (!ASSERT_LT(n, 0, "client_send on destroyed socket"))
>>>>>> +         goto cleanup;
>>>>>> + ASSERT_EQ(errno, ECONNABORTED, "error code on destroyed socket");
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +cleanup:
>>>>>> + close(clien);
>>>>>> +cleanup_serv:
>>>>>> + close(serv);
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +static void test_tcp_server(struct sock_destroy_prog *skel)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + int serv = -1, clien = -1, n = 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + serv = start_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, NULL, SERVER_PORT, 0);
>>>>>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(serv, 0, "start_server"))
>>>>>> +         goto cleanup_serv;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + clien = connect_to_fd(serv, 0);
>>>>>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(clien, 0, "connect_to_fd"))
>>>>>> +         goto cleanup_serv;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + serv = accept(serv, NULL, NULL);
>>>>>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(serv, 0, "serv accept"))
>>>>>> +         goto cleanup;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + n = send(clien, "t", 1, 0);
>>>>>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(n, 0, "client send"))
>>>>>> +         goto cleanup;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /* Run iterator program that destroys server sockets. */
>>>>>> + start_iter_sockets(skel->progs.iter_tcp6_server);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + n = send(clien, "t", 1, 0);
>>>>>> + if (!ASSERT_LT(n, 0, "client_send on destroyed socket"))
>>>>>> +         goto cleanup;
>>>>>> + ASSERT_EQ(errno, ECONNRESET, "error code on destroyed socket");
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +cleanup:
>>>>>> + close(clien);
>>>>>> +cleanup_serv:
>>>>>> + close(serv);
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +static void test_udp_client(struct sock_destroy_prog *skel)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + int serv = -1, clien = -1, n = 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + serv = start_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM, NULL, 6161, 0);
>>>>>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(serv, 0, "start_server"))
>>>>>> +         goto cleanup_serv;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + clien = connect_to_fd(serv, 0);
>>>>>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(clien, 0, "connect_to_fd"))
>>>>>> +         goto cleanup_serv;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + n = send(clien, "t", 1, 0);
>>>>>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(n, 0, "client send"))
>>>>>> +         goto cleanup;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /* Run iterator program that destroys sockets. */
>>>>>> + start_iter_sockets(skel->progs.iter_udp6_client);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + n = send(clien, "t", 1, 0);
>>>>>> + if (!ASSERT_LT(n, 0, "client_send on destroyed socket"))
>>>>>> +         goto cleanup;
>>>>>> + /* UDP sockets have an overriding error code after they are disconnected,
>>>>>> +  * so we don't check for ECONNABORTED error code.
>>>>>> +  */
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +cleanup:
>>>>>> + close(clien);
>>>>>> +cleanup_serv:
>>>>>> + close(serv);
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +static void test_udp_server(struct sock_destroy_prog *skel)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + int *listen_fds = NULL, n, i;
>>>>>> + unsigned int num_listens = 5;
>>>>>> + char buf[1];
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /* Start reuseport servers. */
>>>>>> + listen_fds = start_reuseport_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM,
>>>>>> +                                     "::1", SERVER_PORT, 0,
>>>>>> +                                     num_listens);
>>>>>> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(listen_fds, "start_reuseport_server"))
>>>>>> +         goto cleanup;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /* Run iterator program that destroys server sockets. */
>>>>>> + start_iter_sockets(skel->progs.iter_udp6_server);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_listens; ++i) {
>>>>>> +         n = read(listen_fds[i], buf, sizeof(buf));
>>>>>> +         if (!ASSERT_EQ(n, -1, "read") ||
>>>>>> +             !ASSERT_EQ(errno, ECONNABORTED, "error code on destroyed socket"))
>>>>>> +                 break;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> + ASSERT_EQ(i, num_listens, "server socket");
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +cleanup:
>>>>>> + free_fds(listen_fds, num_listens);
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +void test_sock_destroy(void)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + int cgroup_fd = 0;
>>>>>> + struct sock_destroy_prog *skel;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + skel = sock_destroy_prog__open_and_load();
>>>>>> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open"))
>>>>>> +         return;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/sock_destroy");
>>>>>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup_fd, 0, "join_cgroup"))
>>>>>> +         goto close_cgroup_fd;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + skel->links.sock_connect = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(
>>>>>> +         skel->progs.sock_connect, cgroup_fd);
>>>>>> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.sock_connect, "prog_attach"))
>>>>>> +         goto close_cgroup_fd;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (test__start_subtest("tcp_client"))
>>>>>> +         test_tcp_client(skel);
>>>>>> + if (test__start_subtest("tcp_server"))
>>>>>> +         test_tcp_server(skel);
>>>>>> + if (test__start_subtest("udp_client"))
>>>>>> +         test_udp_client(skel);
>>>>>> + if (test__start_subtest("udp_server"))
>>>>>> +         test_udp_server(skel);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +close_cgroup_fd:
>>>>>> + close(cgroup_fd);
>>>>>> + sock_destroy_prog__destroy(skel);
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_destroy_prog.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_destroy_prog.c
>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>> index 000000000000..8e09d82c50f3
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_destroy_prog.c
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
>>>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +#include "vmlinux.h"
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +#include "bpf_tracing_net.h"
>>>>>> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
>>>>>> +#include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +#define AF_INET6 10
>>>>> 
>>>>> [..]
>>>>> 
>>>>>> +/* Keep it in sync with prog_test/sock_destroy. */
>>>>>> +#define SERVER_PORT 6062
>>>>> 
>>>>> The test looks good, one optional unrelated nit maybe:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I've been guilty of these hard-coded ports in the past, but maybe
>>>>> we should stop hard-coding them? Getting the address of the listener (bound to
>>>>> port 0) and passing it to the bpf program via global variable should be super
>>>>> easy now (with the skeletons and network_helpers).
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> I briefly considered adding the ports in a map, and retrieving them in the test. But it didn't seem worthwhile as the tests should fail clearly when there is a mismatch.
>>> 
>>> My worry is that the amount of those tests that have a hard-coded port
>>> grows and at some point somebody will clash with somebody else.
>>> And it might not be 100% apparent because test_progs is now multi-threaded
>>> and racy..
>>> 
>> 
>> So you would like the ports to be unique across all the tests.
> 
> Yeah, but it's hard without having some kind of global registry. Take
> a look at the following:
> 
> $ grep -Iri _port tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ | grep -P '\d{4}'
> 
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect_force_port4.c:
> sa.sin_port = bpf_htons(22222);
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect_force_port4.c:        if
> (ctx->user_port == bpf_htons(60000)) {
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect_force_port4.c:
> ctx->user_port = bpf_htons(60123);
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect_force_port4.c:        if
> (ctx->user_port == bpf_htons(60123)) {
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect_force_port4.c:
> ctx->user_port = bpf_htons(60000);
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect_force_port4.c:        if
> (ctx->user_port == bpf_htons(60123)) {
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect6_prog.c:#define
> DST_REWRITE_PORT6     6666
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup.c:static const __u16
> SRC_PORT = bpf_htons(8008);
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup.c:static const __u16
> DST_PORT = 7007; /* Host byte order */
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_dtime.c:      __u16
> dst_ns_port = __bpf_htons(50000 + test);
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect4_dropper.c:   if
> (ctx->user_port == bpf_htons(60120))
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect_force_port6.c:
> sa.sin6_port = bpf_htons(22223);
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect_force_port6.c:        if
> (ctx->user_port == bpf_htons(60000)) {
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect_force_port6.c:
> ctx->user_port = bpf_htons(60124);
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect_force_port6.c:        if
> (ctx->user_port == bpf_htons(60124)) {
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect_force_port6.c:
> ctx->user_port = bpf_htons(60000);
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect_force_port6.c:        if
> (ctx->user_port == bpf_htons(60124)) {
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c:#define
> VXLAN_UDP_PORT 4789
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sendmsg4_prog.c:#define DST_PORT
>         4040
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sendmsg4_prog.c:#define
> DST_REWRITE_PORT4     4444
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect4_prog.c:#define
> DST_REWRITE_PORT4     4444
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind6_prog.c:#define SERV6_PORT
>         6060
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind6_prog.c:#define
> SERV6_REWRITE_PORT       6666
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sendmsg6_prog.c:#define
> DST_REWRITE_PORT6     6666
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/recvmsg4_prog.c:#define SERV4_PORT
>         4040
> <cut>
> 
> .... there is much more ...
> 
>>> Getting the address of the listener (bound to
>>> port 0) and passing it to the bpf program via global variable should be super
>>> easy now (with the skeletons and network_helpers).
>> 
>> Just so that we are on the same page, could you point to which network helpers are you referring to here for passing global variables?
> 
> Take a look at the following existing tests:
> * prog_tests/cgroup_skb_sk_lookup.c
>  * run_lookup_test(&skel->bss->g_serv_port, out_sk);
> * progs/cgroup_skb_sk_lookup_kern.c
>  * g_serv_port
> 
> Fundamentally, here is what's preferable to have:
> 
> fd = start_server(..., port=0, ...);
> listener_port = get_port(fd); /* new network_helpers.h helper that
> calls getsockname */
> obj->bss->port = listener_port; /* populate the port in the BPF program */
> 
> Does it make sense?

That makes sense. Good to know for future references. The client tests don't have hard-coded ports anyway, only the server tests do as they are using the so_resuseport option. You did mention that this was an optional nit, so I'll leave the hard-coded ports for the server tests for now. Hope that's reasonable.

> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> And, unrelated, maybe also fix a bunch of places where the reverse christmas
>>>>> tree doesn't look reverse anymore?
>>> 
>>>> Ok. The checks should be part of tooling (e.g., checkpatch) though if they are meant to be enforced consistently, no?
>>> 
>>> They are networking specific, so they are not part of a checkpath :-(
>>> I won't say they are consistently enforced, but we try to keep then
>>> whenever possible.
>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +int bpf_sock_destroy(struct sock_common *sk) __ksym;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +struct {
>>>>>> + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
>>>>>> + __uint(max_entries, 1);
>>>>>> + __type(key, __u32);
>>>>>> + __type(value, __u64);
>>>>>> +} tcp_conn_sockets SEC(".maps");
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +struct {
>>>>>> + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
>>>>>> + __uint(max_entries, 1);
>>>>>> + __type(key, __u32);
>>>>>> + __type(value, __u64);
>>>>>> +} udp_conn_sockets SEC(".maps");
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +SEC("cgroup/connect6")
>>>>>> +int sock_connect(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + int key = 0;
>>>>>> + __u64 sock_cookie = 0;
>>>>>> + __u32 keyc = 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (ctx->family != AF_INET6 || ctx->user_family != AF_INET6)
>>>>>> +         return 1;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + sock_cookie = bpf_get_socket_cookie(ctx);
>>>>>> + if (ctx->protocol == IPPROTO_TCP)
>>>>>> +         bpf_map_update_elem(&tcp_conn_sockets, &key, &sock_cookie, 0);
>>>>>> + else if (ctx->protocol == IPPROTO_UDP)
>>>>>> +         bpf_map_update_elem(&udp_conn_sockets, &keyc, &sock_cookie, 0);
>>>>>> + else
>>>>>> +         return 1;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + return 1;
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +SEC("iter/tcp")
>>>>>> +int iter_tcp6_client(struct bpf_iter__tcp *ctx)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + struct sock_common *sk_common = ctx->sk_common;
>>>>>> + struct seq_file *seq = ctx->meta->seq;
>>>>>> + __u64 sock_cookie = 0;
>>>>>> + __u64 *val;
>>>>>> + int key = 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (!sk_common)
>>>>>> +         return 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (sk_common->skc_family != AF_INET6)
>>>>>> +         return 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + sock_cookie  = bpf_get_socket_cookie(sk_common);
>>>>>> + val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&tcp_conn_sockets, &key);
>>>>>> + if (!val)
>>>>>> +         return 0;
>>>>>> + /* Destroy connected client sockets. */
>>>>>> + if (sock_cookie == *val)
>>>>>> +         bpf_sock_destroy(sk_common);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +SEC("iter/tcp")
>>>>>> +int iter_tcp6_server(struct bpf_iter__tcp *ctx)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + struct sock_common *sk_common = ctx->sk_common;
>>>>>> + struct seq_file *seq = ctx->meta->seq;
>>>>>> + struct tcp6_sock *tcp_sk;
>>>>>> + const struct inet_connection_sock *icsk;
>>>>>> + const struct inet_sock *inet;
>>>>>> + __u16 srcp;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (!sk_common)
>>>>>> +         return 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (sk_common->skc_family != AF_INET6)
>>>>>> +         return 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + tcp_sk = bpf_skc_to_tcp6_sock(sk_common);
>>>>>> + if (!tcp_sk)
>>>>>> +         return 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + icsk = &tcp_sk->tcp.inet_conn;
>>>>>> + inet = &icsk->icsk_inet;
>>>>>> + srcp = bpf_ntohs(inet->inet_sport);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /* Destroy server sockets. */
>>>>>> + if (srcp == SERVER_PORT)
>>>>>> +         bpf_sock_destroy(sk_common);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +SEC("iter/udp")
>>>>>> +int iter_udp6_client(struct bpf_iter__udp *ctx)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + struct seq_file *seq = ctx->meta->seq;
>>>>>> + struct udp_sock *udp_sk = ctx->udp_sk;
>>>>>> + struct sock *sk = (struct sock *) udp_sk;
>>>>>> + __u64 sock_cookie = 0, *val;
>>>>>> + int key = 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (!sk)
>>>>>> +         return 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + sock_cookie  = bpf_get_socket_cookie(sk);
>>>>>> + val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&udp_conn_sockets, &key);
>>>>>> + if (!val)
>>>>>> +         return 0;
>>>>>> + /* Destroy connected client sockets. */
>>>>>> + if (sock_cookie == *val)
>>>>>> +         bpf_sock_destroy((struct sock_common *)sk);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +SEC("iter/udp")
>>>>>> +int iter_udp6_server(struct bpf_iter__udp *ctx)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + struct seq_file *seq = ctx->meta->seq;
>>>>>> + struct udp_sock *udp_sk = ctx->udp_sk;
>>>>>> + struct sock *sk = (struct sock *) udp_sk;
>>>>>> + __u16 srcp;
>>>>>> + struct inet_sock *inet;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (!sk)
>>>>>> +         return 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + inet = &udp_sk->inet;
>>>>>> + srcp = bpf_ntohs(inet->inet_sport);
>>>>>> + if (srcp == SERVER_PORT)
>>>>>> +         bpf_sock_destroy((struct sock_common *)sk);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-29 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-23 20:06 [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/5] bpf-nex: Add socket destroy capability Aditi Ghag
2023-03-23 20:06 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/4] bpf: Implement batching in UDP iterator Aditi Ghag
2023-03-24 21:56   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-27 15:52     ` Aditi Ghag
2023-03-27 16:52       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-27 22:28   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-28 17:06     ` Aditi Ghag
2023-03-28 21:33       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-29 16:20         ` Aditi Ghag
2023-03-23 20:06 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 2/4] bpf: Add bpf_sock_destroy kfunc Aditi Ghag
2023-03-23 23:58   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-24 21:37   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-30 14:42     ` Aditi Ghag
2023-03-30 16:32       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-30 17:30         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-04-03 15:58           ` Aditi Ghag
2023-03-23 20:06 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 3/4] bpf,tcp: Avoid taking fast sock lock in iterator Aditi Ghag
2023-03-24 21:45   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-28 15:20     ` Aditi Ghag
2023-03-27 22:34   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-23 20:06 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_sock_destroy Aditi Ghag
2023-03-24 21:52   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-27 15:57     ` Aditi Ghag
2023-03-27 16:54       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-28 17:50         ` Aditi Ghag
2023-03-28 18:35           ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-29 23:13             ` Aditi Ghag [this message]
2023-03-29 23:25               ` Aditi Ghag
2023-03-29 23:25               ` Stanislav Fomichev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=30733F2E-2CEB-4004-9970-FA791988F887@isovalent.com \
    --to=aditi.ghag@isovalent.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).