* [PATCH 0/1] Fix for VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS on sparc @ 2019-05-17 21:01 Rick Edgecombe 2019-05-17 21:01 ` [PATCH 1/1] vmalloc: Fix issues with flush flag Rick Edgecombe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Rick Edgecombe @ 2019-05-17 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: peterz, linux-mm, sparclinux, netdev, bpf Cc: dave.hansen, namit, Rick Edgecombe Meelis Roos reported issues with the new VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS flag on the sparc architecture. When freeing many BPF JITs simultaneously, the vfree flush operations can become stuck waiting as they each try to vm_unmap_aliases(). It also came up that using this flag is not needed for architectures like sparc that already have normal kernel memory as executable. This patch fixes the usage of this flag on sparc to also fix it in case the root cause is also an issue on other architectures. Separately we can disable usage of VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS for these architectures if desired. Rick Edgecombe (1): vmalloc: Fix issues with flush flag mm/vmalloc.c | 23 +++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] vmalloc: Fix issues with flush flag 2019-05-17 21:01 [PATCH 0/1] Fix for VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS on sparc Rick Edgecombe @ 2019-05-17 21:01 ` Rick Edgecombe 2019-05-20 3:54 ` Edgecombe, Rick P 2019-05-20 19:13 ` Edgecombe, Rick P 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Rick Edgecombe @ 2019-05-17 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: peterz, linux-mm, sparclinux, netdev, bpf Cc: dave.hansen, namit, Rick Edgecombe, Meelis Roos, David S. Miller, Borislav Petkov, Andy Lutomirski, Ingo Molnar Meelis Roos reported issues with the new VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS flag on the sparc architecture. When freeing many BPF JITs at once the free operations can become stuck waiting for locks as they each try to vm_unmap_aliases(). Calls to this function happen frequently on some archs, but in vmalloc itself the lazy purge operations happens more rarely, where only in extreme cases could multiple purges be happening at once. Since this is cross platform code we shouldn't do this here where it could happen concurrently in a burst, and instead just flush the TLB. Also, add a little logic to skip calls to page_address() when possible to further speed this up, since they may have locking on some archs. Lastly, it appears that the calculation of the address range to flush was broken at some point, so fix that as well. Fixes: 868b104d7379 ("mm/vmalloc: Add flag for freeing of special permsissions") Reported-by: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee> Cc: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> --- mm/vmalloc.c | 23 +++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c index 67bbb8d2a0a8..5daa7ec8950f 100644 --- a/mm/vmalloc.c +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c @@ -1531,9 +1531,10 @@ static inline void set_area_direct_map(const struct vm_struct *area, /* Handle removing and resetting vm mappings related to the vm_struct. */ static void vm_remove_mappings(struct vm_struct *area, int deallocate_pages) { + const bool has_set_direct = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_DIRECT_MAP); + const bool flush_reset = area->flags & VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS; unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)area->addr; - unsigned long start = ULONG_MAX, end = 0; - int flush_reset = area->flags & VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS; + unsigned long start = addr, end = addr + get_vm_area_size(area); int i; /* @@ -1542,7 +1543,7 @@ static void vm_remove_mappings(struct vm_struct *area, int deallocate_pages) * This is concerned with resetting the direct map any an vm alias with * execute permissions, without leaving a RW+X window. */ - if (flush_reset && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_DIRECT_MAP)) { + if (flush_reset && !has_set_direct) { set_memory_nx(addr, area->nr_pages); set_memory_rw(addr, area->nr_pages); } @@ -1555,22 +1556,24 @@ static void vm_remove_mappings(struct vm_struct *area, int deallocate_pages) /* * If not deallocating pages, just do the flush of the VM area and - * return. + * return. If the arch doesn't have set_direct_map_(), also skip the + * below work. */ - if (!deallocate_pages) { - vm_unmap_aliases(); + if (!deallocate_pages || !has_set_direct) { + flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, get_vm_area_size(area)); return; } /* * If execution gets here, flush the vm mapping and reset the direct * map. Find the start and end range of the direct mappings to make sure - * the vm_unmap_aliases() flush includes the direct map. + * the flush_tlb_kernel_range() includes the direct map. */ for (i = 0; i < area->nr_pages; i++) { - if (page_address(area->pages[i])) { + addr = (unsigned long)page_address(area->pages[i]); + if (addr) { start = min(addr, start); - end = max(addr, end); + end = max(addr + PAGE_SIZE, end); } } @@ -1580,7 +1583,7 @@ static void vm_remove_mappings(struct vm_struct *area, int deallocate_pages) * reset the direct map permissions to the default. */ set_area_direct_map(area, set_direct_map_invalid_noflush); - _vm_unmap_aliases(start, end, 1); + flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end); set_area_direct_map(area, set_direct_map_default_noflush); } -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] vmalloc: Fix issues with flush flag 2019-05-17 21:01 ` [PATCH 1/1] vmalloc: Fix issues with flush flag Rick Edgecombe @ 2019-05-20 3:54 ` Edgecombe, Rick P 2019-05-20 19:13 ` Edgecombe, Rick P 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Edgecombe, Rick P @ 2019-05-20 3:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev, peterz, linux-mm, davem, sparclinux, bpf Cc: bp, mroos, luto, namit, Hansen, Dave, mingo Hi, After investigating this more, I am not positive why this fixes the issue on sparc. I will continue to investigate as best I can, but would like to request help from some sparc experts on evaluating my line of thinking. I think the changes in this patch are still very worthwhile generally though. Besides fixing the sparc issue: 1. The fixes for the calculation of the direct map address range are important on x86 in case a RO direct map alias ever gets loaded into the TLB. This shouldn't normally happen, but it could cause the permissions to not get reset on the direct map alias, and then the page would return from the page allocator to some other component as RO and cause a crash. This was mostly broken implementing a style suggestion late in the development. As best I can tell, it shouldn't have any effect on sparc. 2. Simply flushing the TLB instead of the whole vm_unmap_alias() operation makes the frees faster and pushes the heavy work to happen on allocation where it would be more expected. vm_unmap_alias() takes some locks including a long hold of vmap_purge_lock, which will make all other VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS vfrees wait while the purge operation happens. The issue observed on an UltraSparc III system was a hang on boot. The only significant difference I can find in how Sparc works in this area is that there is actually special optimization in the TLB flush for handling vmalloc lazy purge operations. Some firmware mappings live between the modules and vmalloc ranges, and if their translations are flushed can cause "hard hangs and crashes [1]. Additionally in the mix, "sparc64 kernel learns about openfirmware's dynamic mappings in this region early in the boot, and then services TLB misses in this area".[1] The firmware protection logic seems to be in place, however later another change was made in the lower asm to do a "flush all" if the range was big enough on this cpu [2]. With the advent of the change this patch addresses, the purge operations would be happening much earlier than before, with the first special permissioned vfree, instead of after the machine has been running for some time and the vmalloc spaces had become fragmented. So my best theory is that the history of vmalloc lazy purges causing hangs on the sparc has come into play here somehow, triggered by that we were doing the purges much earlier. If it was something like this, the fact that we instead only flush the small allocation itself on sparc after this patch would be the reason why it fixes it. Admittedly, there are some missing pieces in the theory. If there are any sparc architecture experts that can help enlighten me if this sounds reasonable at all I would really appreciate it. Thanks, Rick [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/376523/ [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/687780/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] vmalloc: Fix issues with flush flag 2019-05-17 21:01 ` [PATCH 1/1] vmalloc: Fix issues with flush flag Rick Edgecombe 2019-05-20 3:54 ` Edgecombe, Rick P @ 2019-05-20 19:13 ` Edgecombe, Rick P 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Edgecombe, Rick P @ 2019-05-20 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev, peterz, linux-mm, sparclinux, bpf Cc: bp, davem, mroos, luto, namit, Hansen, Dave, mingo On Fri, 2019-05-17 at 14:01 -0700, Rick Edgecomb e wrote: > Meelis Roos reported issues with the new VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS flag on > the > sparc architecture. > Argh, this patch is not correct in the flush range for non-x86. I'll send a revision. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-05-20 19:13 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-05-17 21:01 [PATCH 0/1] Fix for VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS on sparc Rick Edgecombe 2019-05-17 21:01 ` [PATCH 1/1] vmalloc: Fix issues with flush flag Rick Edgecombe 2019-05-20 3:54 ` Edgecombe, Rick P 2019-05-20 19:13 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).