bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
Cc: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
	maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, maximmi@nvidia.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next] bpf, xdp: per-map bpf_redirect_map functions for XDP
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:49:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42f840ea-040f-a468-2108-ecf389cfdf93@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210201103158.6afccf33@carbon>



On 2021-02-01 10:31, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 07:27:57 +0100
> Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2021-01-29 17:45, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>> Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> writes:
>>>    
>>>> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> Currently the bpf_redirect_map() implementation dispatches to the
>>>> correct map-lookup function via a switch-statement. To avoid the
>>>> dispatching, this change adds one bpf_redirect_map() implementation per
>>>> map. Correct function is automatically selected by the BPF verifier.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Hi XDP-folks!
>>>>
>>>> This is another take on my bpf_redirect_xsk() patch [1]. I figured I
>>>> send it as an RFC for some early input. My plan is to include it as
>>>> part of the xdp_do_redirect() optimization of [1].
>>>
>>> Assuming the maintainers are OK with the special-casing in the verifier,
>>> this looks like a neat way to avoid the runtime overhead to me. The
>>> macro hackery is not the prettiest; I wonder if the same effect could be
>>> achieved by using inline functions? If not, at least a comment
>>> explaining the reasoning (and that the verifier will substitute the
>>> right function) might be nice? Mostly in relation to this bit:
>>>   
>>
>> Yeah, I agree with the macro part. I'll replace it with a
>> __always_inline function, instead.
>>
> 
> Yes, I also prefer __always_inline over the macro.
>

Ok! Good!

> 
>>>>    static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_redirect_map_proto = {
>>>> -	.func           = bpf_xdp_redirect_map,
>>>> +	.func           = bpf_xdp_redirect_devmap,
>>>   
>>
>> I'll try to clean this up as well.
> 
> I do like the optimization of having the verifier call the right map
> func directly.  Could you please add a descriptive comment that
> describe this above "bpf_xdp_redirect_map_proto", that this is
> happening in fixup_bpf_calls and use get_xdp_redirect_func (what you
> define).  It is a cool trick, but people reading the code will have a
> hard time following.
>

Good idea, and makes sense! I'll make sure to do that!

Thanks for the input!


Cheers,
Björn


> Surprisingly people do read this code and tries to follow.  I've had
> discussions on the Cilium Slack channel, where people misunderstood how
> our bpf_fib_lookup() calls gets mapped to two different functions
> depending on context (SKB vs XDP).  And that remapping happens in the
> same file (net/core/filter.c).
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-01  9:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20210129153215.190888-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
2021-01-29 16:45 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-02-01  6:27   ` Björn Töpel
2021-02-01  9:31     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-01  9:49       ` Björn Töpel [this message]
     [not found] ` <CAJ+HfNiFtRd-KKMB1t3Mi3MZ=C+u5TTM5YFnzJFfR4Ruzc7c9Q@mail.gmail.com>
2021-01-29 18:06   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42f840ea-040f-a468-2108-ecf389cfdf93@intel.com \
    --to=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jbrouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=maximmi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --subject='Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next] bpf, xdp: per-map bpf_redirect_map functions for XDP' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).