bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	edumazet@google.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bpf PATCH v2 2/6] bpf: tls fix transition through disconnect with close
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 09:35:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d2765584f043_698f2aaeaaf925bcb0@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190710123417.2157a459@cakuba.netronome.com>

Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Jul 2019 20:39:24 -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> > Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Mon, 08 Jul 2019 19:14:05 +0000, John Fastabend wrote:  
> > > > @@ -287,6 +313,27 @@ static void tls_sk_proto_cleanup(struct sock *sk,
> > > >  #endif
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > +static void tls_sk_proto_unhash(struct sock *sk)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
> > > > +	long timeo = sock_sndtimeo(sk, 0);
> > > > +	struct tls_context *ctx;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (unlikely(!icsk->icsk_ulp_data)) {  
> > > 
> > > Is this for when sockmap is stacked on top of TLS and TLS got removed
> > > without letting sockmap know?  
> > 
> > Right its a pattern I used on the sockmap side and put here. But
> > I dropped the patch to let sockmap stack on top of TLS because
> > it was more than a fix IMO. We could probably drop this check on
> > the other hand its harmless.
> 
> I feel like this code is pretty complex I struggle to follow all the
> paths, so perhaps it'd be better to drop stuff that's not necessary 
> to have a clearer picture.
> 

Sure I can drop it and add it later when its necessary.

> > > > +		if (sk->sk_prot->unhash)
> > > > +			sk->sk_prot->unhash(sk);
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
> > > > +	if (ctx->tx_conf == TLS_SW || ctx->rx_conf == TLS_SW)
> > > > +		tls_sk_proto_cleanup(sk, ctx, timeo);
> > > > +	icsk->icsk_ulp_data = NULL;  
> > > 
> > > I think close only starts checking if ctx is NULL in patch 6.
> > > Looks like some chunks of ctx checking/clearing got spread to
> > > patch 1 and some to patch 6.  
> > 
> > Yeah, I thought the patches were easier to read this way but
> > maybe not. Could add something in the commit log.
> 
> Ack! Let me try to get a full grip of patches 2 and 6 and come back 
> to this.
> 
> > > > +	tls_ctx_free_wq(ctx);
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (ctx->unhash)
> > > > +		ctx->unhash(sk);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >  static void tls_sk_proto_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	struct tls_context *ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);  

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-11 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-08 19:13 [bpf PATCH v2 0/6] bpf: sockmap/tls fixes John Fastabend
2019-07-08 19:13 ` [bpf PATCH v2 1/6] tls: remove close callback sock unlock/lock and flush_sync John Fastabend
2019-07-08 19:14 ` [bpf PATCH v2 2/6] bpf: tls fix transition through disconnect with close John Fastabend
2019-07-10  2:45   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-10  3:39     ` John Fastabend
2019-07-10 19:34       ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-10 20:04         ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-11 16:47           ` John Fastabend
2019-07-11 18:32             ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-11 21:25               ` John Fastabend
2019-07-12  3:16                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-15 20:58                   ` John Fastabend
2019-07-11 16:35         ` John Fastabend [this message]
2019-07-08 19:14 ` [bpf PATCH v2 3/6] bpf: sockmap, sock_map_delete needs to use xchg John Fastabend
2019-07-08 19:14 ` [bpf PATCH v2 4/6] bpf: sockmap, synchronize_rcu before free'ing map John Fastabend
2019-07-08 19:15 ` [bpf PATCH v2 5/6] bpf: sockmap, only create entry if ulp is not already enabled John Fastabend
2019-07-08 19:15 ` [bpf PATCH v2 6/6] bpf: sockmap/tls, close can race with map free John Fastabend
2019-07-10  2:36   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-10  2:38   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-10  3:33     ` John Fastabend
2019-07-10 19:35       ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-11 16:39         ` John Fastabend
2019-07-09  6:13 ` [bpf PATCH v2 0/6] bpf: sockmap/tls fixes Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-09 15:40   ` John Fastabend
2019-07-10  0:04     ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-10  2:21       ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-10  3:28         ` John Fastabend

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5d2765584f043_698f2aaeaaf925bcb0@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch \
    --to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).