From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: acme@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
kjain@linux.ibm.com, kernel-team@fb.com,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 1/3] perf: enable branch record for software events
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 13:49:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <613138e72048_2c56f20869@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210902165706.2812867-2-songliubraving@fb.com>
Song Liu wrote:
> The typical way to access branch record (e.g. Intel LBR) is via hardware
> perf_event. For CPUs with FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI support, PMI could capture
> reliable LBR. On the other hand, LBR could also be useful in non-PMI
> scenario. For example, in kretprobe or bpf fexit program, LBR could
> provide a lot of information on what happened with the function. Add API
> to use branch record for software use.
>
> Note that, when the software event triggers, it is necessary to stop the
> branch record hardware asap. Therefore, static_call is used to remove some
> branch instructions in this process.
>
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> ---
[...]
> void intel_pmu_auto_reload_read(struct perf_event *event);
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index fe156a8170aa3..4fe11f4f896b1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ struct perf_guest_info_callbacks {
> #include <linux/cgroup.h>
> #include <linux/refcount.h>
> #include <linux/security.h>
> +#include <linux/static_call.h>
> #include <asm/local.h>
>
> struct perf_callchain_entry {
> @@ -1612,4 +1613,26 @@ extern void __weak arch_perf_update_userpage(struct perf_event *event,
> extern __weak u64 arch_perf_get_page_size(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr);
> #endif
>
> +/*
> + * Snapshot branch stack on software events.
> + *
> + * Branch stack can be very useful in understanding software events. For
> + * example, when a long function, e.g. sys_perf_event_open, returns an
> + * errno, it is not obvious why the function failed. Branch stack could
> + * provide very helpful information in this type of scenarios.
> + *
> + * On software event, it is necessary to stop the hardware branch recorder
> + * fast. Otherwise, the hardware register/buffer will be flushed with
> + * entries af the triggering event. Therefore, static call is used to
^^
nit, af->of
> + * stop the hardware recorder.
> + */
> +
> +/*
> + * cnt is the number of entries allocated for entries.
> + * Return number of entries copied to .
> + */
A bit out of scope, but LGTM.
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-02 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-02 16:57 [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/3] bpf: introduce bpf_get_branch_snapshot Song Liu
2021-09-02 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 1/3] perf: enable branch record for software events Song Liu
2021-09-02 20:49 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2021-09-03 8:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-03 16:50 ` Song Liu
2021-09-07 18:59 ` Song Liu
2021-09-07 20:50 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-09-03 8:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-03 16:45 ` Song Liu
2021-09-04 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-02 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 2/3] bpf: introduce helper bpf_get_branch_snapshot Song Liu
2021-09-02 20:56 ` John Fastabend
2021-09-02 22:04 ` Song Liu
2021-09-02 22:53 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-09-02 23:03 ` Song Liu
2021-09-02 23:05 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-09-03 1:03 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-09-03 8:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-03 16:58 ` Song Liu
2021-09-03 8:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-03 17:06 ` Song Liu
2021-09-03 17:10 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-09-04 10:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-04 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-02 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add test for bpf_get_branch_snapshot Song Liu
2021-09-02 21:05 ` John Fastabend
2021-09-02 22:54 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/3] bpf: introduce bpf_get_branch_snapshot Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=613138e72048_2c56f20869@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).