bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, roopa@nvidia.com,
	dsahern@kernel.org, m@lambda.lt, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] net, neigh: Add NTF_MANAGED flag for managed neighbor entries
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 13:23:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <62dd9515-968a-451c-2da6-da0f03082ad2@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YWauH/k8tfuLzsU5@shredder>

On 10/13/21 11:59 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 11:26:50AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 10/12/21 6:31 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>>> In our HW the nexthop table is squashed together with the neighbour
>>> table, so that it provides {netdev, MAC} and not {netdev, IP} with which
>>> the kernel performs another lookup in its neighbour table. We want to
>>> avoid situations where we perform multipathing between valid and failed
>>> nexthop (basically, fib_multipath_use_neigh=1), so we only program valid
>>> nexthop. But it means that nothing will trigger the resolution of the
>>> failed nexthops, thus the need to probe the neighbours.
>>
>> Makes sense. Given you have the setup/HW, if you have a chance to consolidate
>> the mlxsw logic with the new NTF_MANAGED entries, that would be awesome!
> 
> Yes, I will take care of that

Perfect, thanks a lot!

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-13 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-11 12:12 [PATCH net-next 0/4] Managed Neighbor Entries Daniel Borkmann
2021-10-11 12:12 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] net, neigh: Fix NTF_EXT_LEARNED in combination with NTF_USE Daniel Borkmann
2021-10-12 14:23   ` David Ahern
2021-10-11 12:12 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] net, neigh: Enable state migration between NUD_PERMANENT and NTF_USE Daniel Borkmann
2021-10-12 14:25   ` David Ahern
2021-10-11 12:12 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] net, neigh: Extend neigh->flags to 32 bit to allow for extensions Daniel Borkmann
2021-10-12 14:31   ` David Ahern
2021-10-12 14:46     ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-10-12 21:46   ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-10-11 12:12 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] net, neigh: Add NTF_MANAGED flag for managed neighbor entries Daniel Borkmann
2021-10-12 14:51   ` David Ahern
2021-10-12 15:05     ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-10-12 15:26       ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-10-12 16:31   ` Ido Schimmel
2021-10-13  9:26     ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-10-13  9:59       ` Ido Schimmel
2021-10-13 11:23         ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2021-10-13 14:10       ` David Ahern
2022-01-31 20:43   ` Eric Dumazet
2022-01-31 21:17     ` Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=62dd9515-968a-451c-2da6-da0f03082ad2@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=m@lambda.lt \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).