BPF Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb.com>,
	"Peter Ziljstra" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 2/6] bpf: prevent deadlock from recursive bpf_task_storage_[get|delete]
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 07:16:18 +0000
Message-ID: <6A4F1927-AF73-4AC8-AE44-5878ACEDF944@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzaZ0ATbJsLoQu_SRUYgzkak9zv61N+T=gijOQ+X=57ErA@mail.gmail.com>



> On Feb 22, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 5:23 PM Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> wrote:
>> 
>> BPF helpers bpf_task_storage_[get|delete] could hold two locks:
>> bpf_local_storage_map_bucket->lock and bpf_local_storage->lock. Calling
>> these helpers from fentry/fexit programs on functions in bpf_*_storage.c
>> may cause deadlock on either locks.
>> 
>> Prevent such deadlock with a per cpu counter, bpf_task_storage_busy, which
>> is similar to bpf_prog_active. We need this counter to be global, because
>> the two locks here belong to two different objects: bpf_local_storage_map
>> and bpf_local_storage. If we pick one of them as the owner of the counter,
>> it is still possible to trigger deadlock on the other lock. For example,
>> if bpf_local_storage_map owns the counters, it cannot prevent deadlock
>> on bpf_local_storage->lock when two maps are used.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> 
> 
> [...]
> 
>> @@ -109,7 +136,9 @@ static void *bpf_pid_task_storage_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
>>                goto out;
>>        }
>> 
>> +       bpf_task_storage_lock();
>>        sdata = task_storage_lookup(task, map, true);
>> +       bpf_task_storage_unlock();
>>        put_pid(pid);
>>        return sdata ? sdata->data : NULL;
>> out:
>> @@ -141,8 +170,10 @@ static int bpf_pid_task_storage_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
>>                goto out;
>>        }
>> 
>> +       bpf_task_storage_lock();
>>        sdata = bpf_local_storage_update(
>>                task, (struct bpf_local_storage_map *)map, value, map_flags);
> 
> this should probably be container_of() instead of casting

bpf_task_storage.c uses casting in multiple places. How about we fix it in a 
separate patch?

Thanks,
Song

> 
>> +       bpf_task_storage_unlock();
>> 
>>        err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(sdata);
>> out:
>> @@ -185,7 +216,9 @@ static int bpf_pid_task_storage_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
>>                goto out;
>>        }
>> 
>> +       bpf_task_storage_lock();
>>        err = task_storage_delete(task, map);
>> +       bpf_task_storage_unlock();
>> out:
>>        put_pid(pid);
>>        return err;
> 
> [...]


  reply index

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-23  1:20 [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/6] bpf: enable task local storage for tracing programs Song Liu
2021-02-23  1:20 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/6] " Song Liu
2021-02-23  3:08   ` kernel test robot
2021-02-23  4:04   ` kernel test robot
2021-02-23 19:23   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2021-02-23 20:51     ` Song Liu
2021-02-23  1:20 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 2/6] bpf: prevent deadlock from recursive bpf_task_storage_[get|delete] Song Liu
2021-02-23  6:21   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-23  7:16     ` Song Liu [this message]
2021-02-23  7:19       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-23 16:44         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-02-23 11:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-23 20:49     ` Song Liu
2021-02-23  1:20 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 3/6] selftests/bpf: add non-BPF_LSM test for task local storage Song Liu
2021-02-23  1:20 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 4/6] selftests/bpf: test deadlock from recursive bpf_task_storage_[get|delete] Song Liu
2021-02-23  1:20 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 5/6] bpf: runqslower: prefer using local vmlimux to generate vmlinux.h Song Liu
2021-02-23  6:26   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-23 21:24   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2021-02-23  1:20 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 6/6] bpf: runqslower: use task local storage Song Liu
2021-02-23 21:33   ` Martin KaFai Lau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6A4F1927-AF73-4AC8-AE44-5878ACEDF944@fb.com \
    --to=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

BPF Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/0 bpf/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 bpf bpf/ https://lore.kernel.org/bpf \
		bpf@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index bpf

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.bpf


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git