From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134BFC433E0 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:39:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4EA235F7 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:39:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727723AbhAVNjN (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2021 08:39:13 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:25569 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727988AbhAVNis (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2021 08:38:48 -0500 IronPort-SDR: u3p0pslQMFFE76dp+wXQxrKtb3F0Fsd+1+jiy8GGxf/aGyVTapCGCgEZEaDJjrzDsS+wXO5om+ pebR7VzSQxyQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9871"; a="178667667" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,366,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="178667667" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Jan 2021 05:38:08 -0800 IronPort-SDR: jlFI4hq8v2VrZRdCUaZMMFL9j6hV9x+sWehbFcHgzCBSz7JZ4T8HQ8UhH0bjA0nKtKBfGAOAsj FnXVlHVSzBew== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,366,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="385758087" Received: from mdoronin-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO btopel-mobl.ger.intel.com) ([10.252.44.52]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Jan 2021 05:38:02 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] AF_XDP clean up/perf improvements To: =?UTF-8?Q?Toke_H=c3=b8iland-J=c3=b8rgensen?= , =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: magnus.karlsson@intel.com, maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, kuba@kernel.org, jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, maximmi@nvidia.com, davem@davemloft.net, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, ciara.loftus@intel.com, weqaar.a.janjua@intel.com, andrii@kernel.org References: <20210122105351.11751-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> <877do56reh.fsf@toke.dk> From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= Message-ID: <82c445fd-5be8-c9e8-eda1-68ed6f355966@intel.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 14:37:58 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <877do56reh.fsf@toke.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On 2021-01-22 14:19, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Björn Töpel writes: > >> This series has some clean up/performance improvements for XDP >> sockets. >> >> The first two patches are cleanups for the AF_XDP core, and the >> restructure actually give a little performance boost. >> >> The last patch adds support for selecting AF_XDP BPF program, based on >> what the running kernel supports. >> >> The patches were earlier part of the bigger "bpf_redirect_xsk()" >> series [1]. I pulled out the non-controversial parts into this series. > > What about the first patch from that series, refactoring the existing > bpf_redirect_map() handling? I think that would be eligible for sending > on its own as well :) > Yeah, I'm planning on doing that, but I figured I'd wait for Hangbin's work to go first. Björn > -Toke >