BPF Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Sebastian Sewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 09/19] bpf: Use BPF_PROG_RUN_PIN_ON_CPU() at simple call sites.
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:39:45 -0800
Message-ID: <87a75ftkwu.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200214161503.804093748@linutronix.de>

Hi,

Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes:

> From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
>
> All of these cases are strictly of the form:
>
> 	preempt_disable();
> 	BPF_PROG_RUN(...);
> 	preempt_enable();
>
> Replace this with BPF_PROG_RUN_PIN_ON_CPU() which wraps BPF_PROG_RUN()
> with:
>
> 	migrate_disable();
> 	BPF_PROG_RUN(...);
> 	migrate_enable();
>
> On non RT enabled kernels this maps to preempt_disable/enable() and on RT
> enabled kernels this solely prevents migration, which is sufficient as
> there is no requirement to prevent reentrancy to any BPF program from a
> preempting task. The only requirement is that the program stays on the same
> CPU.
>
> Therefore, this is a trivially correct transformation.
>
> [ tglx: Converted to BPF_PROG_RUN_PIN_ON_CPU() ]
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>
> ---
>  include/linux/filter.h    |    4 +---
>  kernel/seccomp.c          |    4 +---
>  net/core/flow_dissector.c |    4 +---
>  net/core/skmsg.c          |    8 ++------
>  net/kcm/kcmsock.c         |    4 +---
>  5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/include/linux/filter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/filter.h
> @@ -713,9 +713,7 @@ static inline u32 bpf_prog_run_clear_cb(
>  	if (unlikely(prog->cb_access))
>  		memset(cb_data, 0, BPF_SKB_CB_LEN);
>  
> -	preempt_disable();
> -	res = BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, skb);
> -	preempt_enable();
> +	res = BPF_PROG_RUN_PIN_ON_CPU(prog, skb);
>  	return res;
>  }
>  
> --- a/kernel/seccomp.c
> +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
> @@ -268,16 +268,14 @@ static u32 seccomp_run_filters(const str
>  	 * All filters in the list are evaluated and the lowest BPF return
>  	 * value always takes priority (ignoring the DATA).
>  	 */
> -	preempt_disable();
>  	for (; f; f = f->prev) {
> -		u32 cur_ret = BPF_PROG_RUN(f->prog, sd);
> +		u32 cur_ret = BPF_PROG_RUN_PIN_ON_CPU(f->prog, sd);
>

More a question really, isn't the behavior changing here? i.e. shouldn't
migrate_disable()/migrate_enable() be moved to outside the loop? Or is
running seccomp filters on different cpus not a problem?

-- 
Vinicius

  reply index

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-14 13:39 [RFC patch 00/19] bpf: Make BPF and PREEMPT_RT co-exist Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 01/19] sched: Provide migrate_disable/enable() inlines Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 02/19] sched: Provide cant_migrate() Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 03/19] bpf: Update locking comment in hashtab code Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 04/19] bpf/tracing: Remove redundant preempt_disable() in __bpf_trace_run() Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-19 16:54   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-19 17:26     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 05/19] perf/bpf: Remove preempt disable around BPF invocation Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 06/19] bpf: Dont iterate over possible CPUs with interrupts disabled Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 07/19] bpf: Provide BPF_PROG_RUN_PIN_ON_CPU() macro Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 18:50   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-02-14 19:36     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 08/19] bpf: Replace cant_sleep() with cant_migrate() Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 09/19] bpf: Use BPF_PROG_RUN_PIN_ON_CPU() at simple call sites Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-19  1:39   ` Vinicius Costa Gomes [this message]
2020-02-19  9:00     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-19 16:38       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-02-21  0:20       ` Kees Cook
2020-02-21 14:00         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-21 14:05           ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-21 22:15           ` Kees Cook
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 10/19] trace/bpf: Use migrate disable in trace_call_bpf() Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 11/19] bpf/tests: Use migrate disable instead of preempt disable Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 12/19] bpf: Use migrate_disable/enabe() in trampoline code Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 13/19] bpf: Use migrate_disable/enable in array macros and cgroup/lirc code Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 14/19] bpf: Use migrate_disable() in hashtab code Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 19:11   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-02-14 19:56     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-18 23:36       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-02-19  0:49         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-19  1:23           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-02-19 15:17         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-02-20  4:19           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 15/19] bpf: Use migrate_disable() in sys_bpf() Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 16/19] bpf: Factor out hashtab bucket lock operations Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 17/19] bpf: Prepare hashtab locking for PREEMPT_RT Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 18/19] bpf, lpm: Make locking RT friendly Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 19/19] bpf/stackmap: Dont trylock mmap_sem with PREEMPT_RT and interrupts disabled Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 17:53 ` [RFC patch 00/19] bpf: Make BPF and PREEMPT_RT co-exist David Miller
2020-02-14 18:36   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-17 12:59     ` [PATCH] bpf: Enforce map preallocation for all instrumentation programs Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-15 20:09 ` [RFC patch 00/19] bpf: Make BPF and PREEMPT_RT co-exist Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a75ftkwu.fsf@linux.intel.com \
    --to=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

BPF Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/0 bpf/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 bpf bpf/ https://lore.kernel.org/bpf \
		bpf@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index bpf

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.bpf


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git