From: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>,
Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: optimize constant blinding
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 22:01:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87muig3ozf.fsf@netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQLt7=9XQRccerLqHO8cdXTLy-uNBt-JOjbx=bAFouLf3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Alexei Starovoitov writes:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 1:40 PM Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> wrote:
>>
>> After digest Alexei and Andrii's reply, I still don't see the need to turn
>> branch target into list, and I am not sure whether pool based list sound
>> good? it saves size, resize pool doesn't invalid allocated node (the offset
>> doesn't change) but requires one extra addition to calculate the pointer.
>
> I don't think it worth to do a pool to accelerate kmalloc.
Got it.
> I doubt it will be faster either.
Will benchmark.
Regards,
Jiong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-17 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-12 11:32 [PATCH] bpf: optimize constant blinding Naveen N. Rao
2019-06-12 14:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-12 15:04 ` Jiong Wang
2019-06-12 15:25 ` Jiong Wang
2019-06-12 15:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 15:13 ` Jiong Wang
2019-06-14 17:05 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 22:28 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-06-17 19:47 ` Edward Cree
2019-06-17 19:59 ` Jiong Wang
2019-06-17 20:11 ` Edward Cree
2019-06-17 20:40 ` Jiong Wang
2019-06-17 20:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-17 21:01 ` Jiong Wang [this message]
2019-06-17 21:16 ` Edward Cree
2019-06-19 20:45 ` Jiong Wang
2019-06-14 4:30 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87muig3ozf.fsf@netronome.com \
--to=jiong.wang@netronome.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=ecree@solarflare.com \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).