From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Martin Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Cc: "daniel\@iogearbox.net" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>,
"bpf\@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2] xdp: Handle device unregister for devmap_hash map type
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 12:26:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pniue4cw.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191017190219.hpphf7jnyn6xapb6@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Martin Lau <kafai@fb.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:52:32PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> It seems I forgot to add handling of devmap_hash type maps to the device
>> unregister hook for devmaps. This omission causes devices to not be
>> properly released, which causes hangs.
>>
>> Fix this by adding the missing handler.
>>
>> Fixes: 6f9d451ab1a3 ("xdp: Add devmap_hash map type for looking up devices by hashed index")
>> Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
>> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - Grab the update lock while walking the map and removing entries.
>>
>> kernel/bpf/devmap.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
>> index d27f3b60ff6d..a0a1153da5ae 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
>> @@ -719,6 +719,38 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops dev_map_hash_ops = {
>> .map_check_btf = map_check_no_btf,
>> };
>>
>> +static void dev_map_hash_remove_netdev(struct bpf_dtab *dtab,
>> + struct net_device *netdev)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + int i;
> dtab->n_buckets is u32.
Oh, right, will fix.
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&dtab->index_lock, flags);
>> + for (i = 0; i < dtab->n_buckets; i++) {
>> + struct bpf_dtab_netdev *dev, *odev;
>> + struct hlist_head *head;
>> +
>> + head = dev_map_index_hash(dtab, i);
>> + dev = hlist_entry_safe(rcu_dereference_raw(hlist_first_rcu(head)),
> The spinlock has already been held. Is rcu_deref still needed?
I guess it's not strictly needed, but since it's an rcu-protected list,
and hlist_first_rcu() returns an __rcu-annotated type, I think we will
get a 'sparse' warning if it's omitted, no?
And since it's just a READ_ONCE, it doesn't actually hurt since this is
not the fast path, so I'd lean towards just keeping it? WDYT?
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-18 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-17 10:52 [PATCH bpf v2] xdp: Handle device unregister for devmap_hash map type Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-17 19:02 ` Martin Lau
2019-10-18 10:26 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2019-10-18 16:50 ` Martin Lau
2019-10-18 19:28 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pniue4cw.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).