bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: selftests: seccomp_bpf failure on 5.15
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 13:35:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9193x4j.fsf@disp2133> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202111030838.CB201E4@keescook> (Kees Cook's message of "Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:14:47 -0700")

Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:

> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 01:22:19PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:
>> 
>> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 05:06:53PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:
>> >> 
>> >> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:26:26PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> Is it a problem that the debugger can see the signal if the process does
>> >> not?
>> >
>> > Right, I'm trying to understand that too. However, my neighbor just lost
>> > power. :|
>> >
>> > What I was in the middle of checking was what ptrace "sees" going
>> > through a fatal SIGSYS; my initial debugging attempts were weird.
>> 
>> Kees have you regained power and had a chance to see my SA_IMMUTABLE
>> patch?
>
> Apologies; I got busy with other stuff, but I've tested this now. It's
> happy and I see the expected behaviors again. Note that I used the patch
> with this change:
>
> -#define SA_IMMUTABLE           0x008000000
> +#define SA_IMMUTABLE           0x00800000
>
> Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

Thanks.

And I see you have written a test as well that should keep
this kind of bug from happening again.

Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-03 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-28 16:21 selftests: seccomp_bpf failure on 5.15 Andrea Righi
2021-10-28 16:56 ` Kees Cook
2021-10-28 17:26   ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-10-28 18:47     ` Kees Cook
2021-10-28 22:06       ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-10-29 14:58         ` Kees Cook
2021-10-29 15:17           ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-11-02 18:22           ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-11-03 16:14             ` Kees Cook
2021-11-03 18:35               ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2021-10-29 15:09       ` [PATCH] signal: Add SA_IMMUTABLE to ensure forced siganls do not get changed Eric W. Biederman
2021-10-31 17:40         ` Andrea Righi
2021-11-01 22:28           ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v9193x4j.fsf@disp2133 \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=andrea.righi@canonical.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).