From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03BB4C11F68 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 09:44:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6444613EA for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 09:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231176AbhGBJqu (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2021 05:46:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34260 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231130AbhGBJqt (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2021 05:46:49 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd36.google.com (mail-io1-xd36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d36]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF940C061764 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 02:44:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd36.google.com with SMTP id d9so10930226ioo.2 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 02:44:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qqO0BGnrypD/wVeYBOQgNTRPS2etKNdrYj2ZSsBXYfg=; b=dNhb3bIORfzreK4J0xC93Os9lEr36Ys/zZxwnbDpW+94sRto0b1L1BP4jqSQegNECG W5FXEB5t6LG9AkhADWKUeyLjMIyKJdoJG3TLiKk2ODuPwuZuky8NTOCXLUMpie0wzVNe aS8FNLJbKBbRsZfrycDrnyLPCBEFYs887jqsEs+aDX+/axvZyNHnWNJapBfMqBbs6nzC fMwWNIJ3EMfTKHQ7y67qFEezLXk55fV8cyjFFu4rcrzdL93M7upuvv3VIxfx2gbPmBfw R/2/8uDJjeIBJRP5lwmoUW14zRx27Gos0QyI1ykpIeJzEDPNzDbazZKD6iFGT8AVzY3g lFBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qqO0BGnrypD/wVeYBOQgNTRPS2etKNdrYj2ZSsBXYfg=; b=jrYmHG+CNWJraCWq7EV8KbcZkxRsL5S250dEW5HLCzZfG2sra407P+CJ7xL6M/2O2U U9lJ4xjOgtoCF+v1IR/ZNwERLdYiQlRWUn1vvTZoXyIMeK+cz+3b0IwADVo4kCP0ELRw UaXuEW25x7pmNHri6hYdKGEq6V6TpatvAv7p1Gc1RyHOlPuJMabYMyz8SOlawEC04fPL wlgUrhh3E+iu/ej/MCAKY/VeC+0+aiveyTz0ZjLFj14/Zl0NYOcYiNGtd5BauT7awya9 ed/h/Wqni+CE1FeeHdBorAYGogTt0eZPwS155avbh7mdg0lwLXbl/3zzO2KGO2eltkzg cT9w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533rtzA0HyyjPEwqRyKAncmBxlUoi0f3DXZ5Y/nYAFIfar5MM9wv s2LjuXlEH2CLB9a85HnKUXWLQon+6t39cuM8CYQkDSavB2Q8Ig== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwHsnB+KUW2qlnPzouDX1gMa0JrdWnV6BCavasMQWHFkVVfnhqZJGcVIHzxeSzpC+HnTrBKT3EvhZ/CeR39Hd8= X-Received: by 2002:a02:3506:: with SMTP id k6mr3586781jaa.39.1625219057101; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 02:44:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1625133383.8r6ttp782l.naveen@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: From: Brendan Jackman Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 11:44:06 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [BUG soft lockup] Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3] bpf: Propagate stack bounds to registers in atomics w/ BPF_FETCH To: Jiri Olsa Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" , Sandipan Das , Andrii Nakryiko , Alexei Starovoitov , bpf , Daniel Borkmann , John Fastabend , KP Singh , LKML , Florent Revest Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 at 16:15, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 04:32:03PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote: > > Yes, I think I just found the issue. We aren't looking at the correct BPF > > instruction when checking the IMM value. > > great, nice catch! :-) that fixes it for me.. Ahh, nice. +1 thanks for taking a look!