From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6462C433E0 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 20:58:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93C364DE0 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 20:58:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231217AbhA1U6M (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:58:12 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41778 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231181AbhA1U6H (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:58:07 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-x130.google.com (mail-il1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::130]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 222F5C061573; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:57:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-x130.google.com with SMTP id l4so6559468ilo.11; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:57:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=i9REdMi6SebWG3JZ7lgPYTN/NgmA8D8mxCSnCKhI23s=; b=awtT27WDnqMlsreiZ5miMG1XQEuMR5MnbJY1RrnQYJ+FhUVmxbcGc8k4Jpkxm12XFJ Tn/fgl2nmNDGTQ2jkdSUdUzyXnO3xpVxWuF1LgDVj0gdjLynM97q3PJ/QuUYZejtHR+V M1c3XIobqVU3pnQml2FvBrdxsux2EKC5P47vOYuzYRgAssutvK9iDNmv3z4okM3sMWSU x/hgYmRx4zk48E3X/iiCvu4a9X5UCBQkFLs5M8++qpVac4Wele3RwZhmaGkFWBpsNp2h ZRPHPyaRBCvnF6UU6FAsdI4jNqTDOtR6bOK6tvpKVoR7IIOgu25WCTWwLxiUHW0icuWU lLaQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=i9REdMi6SebWG3JZ7lgPYTN/NgmA8D8mxCSnCKhI23s=; b=nGsnjnSlCjxE+WMrXU6FnHbDxsTMcYSABUi+buXrPF0gt2+WPTLsGJwqMp5BxTzNzr lP6s8XYxglY9NZzbv0cqSb9aC0AdqxOLqNQ3eyguPGPyKBRwiut6CPqk9BCqQDOwjfAW LufdaWCRi7G5eMJV9/kzWm841RvDgFUVlrjmQHhP4D/WT4O07DXZN72OzjKDGTFLl0SP E8OqwLuRyDZLAjJyh19WuztNQ7U/tcZuCEAm9mmOlAezS7Fq32TV60eNfJhy4SRV5jul o4azyythn2fKHxx3EXJZbo8TK90ep9hS/38iJeO/3Otg1vs/xb3fDxnSuK0n4xbfDNQu DFYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530oqM0FWmW+12WHIJ38bn8HLO27tOZPl6UCNp21bSjwzAta4vus YYZTidDQijfeUJQEFWFSCOw13Gjlc04aYdMc9vU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwq9M4gqcXGgf3hWfRmyOnXAcHDSeKfUjxHN1tLzqeVQBFL4f7mHskBkk+tSon6+ETF4OEa6958BCGpXlBlQxg= X-Received: by 2002:a92:c5c8:: with SMTP id s8mr721637ilt.186.1611867445626; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:57:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210112184004.1302879-1-jolsa@kernel.org> <20210121133825.GB12699@kernel.org> <20210128200046.GA794568@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20210128200046.GA794568@kernel.org> Reply-To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com From: Sedat Dilek Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 21:57:14 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFT] pahole 1.20 RC was Re: [PATCH] btf_encoder: Add extra checks for symbol names To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Andrii Nakryiko , Tom Stellard , Jiri Olsa , dwarves@vger.kernel.org, bpf , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , Yonghong Song , Hao Luo , Mark Wielaard , =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:00 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 08:11:17PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko escreveu: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:07 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > Do you want Nick's DWARF v5 patch-series as a base? > > > Arnaldo was going to figure out the DWARF v5 problem, so I'm leaving > > it up to him. I'm curious about DWARF v4 problems because no one yet > > reported that previously. > > I think I have the reported one fixed, Andrii, can you please do > whatever pre-release tests you can in your environment with what is in: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/devel/pahole/pahole.git/log/?h=DW_AT_data_bit_offset > > ? > > The cset has the tests I performed and the references to the bugzilla > ticket and Daniel has tested as well for his XDR + gcc 11 problem. > > Thanks, > What Git tree should someone use to test this? Linus Git? bpf / bpf-next? - Sedat -