From: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/9] bpf: Replace RET_XXX_OR_NULL with RET_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULL
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 11:05:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+khW7ha6xCR8PGdrHpZRbkkFHCqT-V0kSXxzXR47zOz5e46WQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzZShouPUqbjr6fzqSy=Lp3Y36KTkFm6OaNSE=N0V9+_Xw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 9:51 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 3:22 PM Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > We have introduced a new type to make bpf_ret composable, by
> > reserving high bits to represent flags.
> >
> > One of the flag is PTR_MAYBE_NULL, which indicates a pointer
> > may be NULL. When applying this flag to ret_types, it means
> > the returned value could be a NULL pointer. This patch
> > switches the qualified arg_types to use this flag.
> > The ret_types changed in this patch include:
> >
> > 1. RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL
> > 2. RET_PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL
> > 3. RET_PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK_OR_NULL
> > 4. RET_PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON_OR_NULL
> > 5. RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL
> > 6. RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID_OR_NULL
> > 7. RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL
> >
> > This patch doesn't eliminate the use of these names, instead
> > it makes them aliases to 'RET_PTR_TO_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULL'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/bpf.h | 19 ++++++++++------
> > kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 2 +-
> > kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >
>
> [...]
>
> > @@ -6570,28 +6570,28 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > regs[BPF_REG_0].type =
> > - fn->ret_type == RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID ?
> > - PTR_TO_MEM : PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL;
> > + (ret_type & PTR_MAYBE_NULL) ?
> > + PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL : PTR_TO_MEM;
>
> nit: I expected something like (let's use the fact that those flags
> are the same across different enums):
>
> regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_MEM | (ret_type & PTR_MAYBE_NULL);
>
We haven't taught reg_type to recognize PTR_MAYBE_NULL until the next
patch. Patch 4/9 does have the suggested conversion:
regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_MEM | ret_flag;
>
> > regs[BPF_REG_0].mem_size = tsize;
> > } else {
> > regs[BPF_REG_0].type =
> > - fn->ret_type == RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID ?
> > - PTR_TO_BTF_ID : PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL;
> > + (ret_type & PTR_MAYBE_NULL) ?
> > + PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL : PTR_TO_BTF_ID;
>
> same as above
>
> > regs[BPF_REG_0].btf = meta.ret_btf;
> > regs[BPF_REG_0].btf_id = meta.ret_btf_id;
> > }
> > - } else if (fn->ret_type == RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL ||
> > - fn->ret_type == RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID) {
> > + } else if (base_type(ret_type) == RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID) {
> > int ret_btf_id;
> >
> > mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_0);
> > - regs[BPF_REG_0].type = fn->ret_type == RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID ?
> > - PTR_TO_BTF_ID :
> > - PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL;
> > + regs[BPF_REG_0].type = (ret_type & PTR_MAYBE_NULL) ?
> > + PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL :
> > + PTR_TO_BTF_ID;
>
> and here
>
>
> > ret_btf_id = *fn->ret_btf_id;
> > if (ret_btf_id == 0) {
> > - verbose(env, "invalid return type %d of func %s#%d\n",
> > - fn->ret_type, func_id_name(func_id), func_id);
> > + verbose(env, "invalid return type %lu of func %s#%d\n",
> > + base_type(ret_type), func_id_name(func_id),
>
> base type returns u32, shouldn't it be %u then?
>
Ack, you are right. When writing this, I know '%lu' will work but
didn't give it much thought. Will use '%u' in v2.
> > + func_id);
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > /* current BPF helper definitions are only coming from
> > @@ -6600,8 +6600,8 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
> > regs[BPF_REG_0].btf = btf_vmlinux;
> > regs[BPF_REG_0].btf_id = ret_btf_id;
> > } else {
> > - verbose(env, "unknown return type %d of func %s#%d\n",
> > - fn->ret_type, func_id_name(func_id), func_id);
> > + verbose(env, "unknown return type %lu of func %s#%d\n",
> > + base_type(ret_type), func_id_name(func_id), func_id);
>
> same %u
>
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1.400.ga245620fadb-goog
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-07 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-06 23:22 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/9] Introduce composable bpf types Hao Luo
2021-12-06 23:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/9] bpf: Introduce composable reg, ret and arg types Hao Luo
2021-12-06 23:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/9] bpf: Replace ARG_XXX_OR_NULL with ARG_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULL Hao Luo
2021-12-07 5:45 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-12-07 18:52 ` Hao Luo
2021-12-06 23:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/9] bpf: Replace RET_XXX_OR_NULL with RET_XXX " Hao Luo
2021-12-07 5:51 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-12-07 19:05 ` Hao Luo [this message]
2021-12-06 23:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/9] bpf: Replace PTR_TO_XXX_OR_NULL with PTR_TO_XXX " Hao Luo
2021-12-07 6:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-12-08 3:37 ` Hao Luo
2021-12-08 20:03 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-12-09 21:45 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-12-10 19:56 ` Hao Luo
2021-12-13 1:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-12-13 2:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-12-17 0:32 ` Hao Luo
2021-12-06 23:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/9] bpf: Introduce MEM_RDONLY flag Hao Luo
2021-12-07 6:14 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-12-08 3:41 ` Hao Luo
2021-12-06 23:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/9] bpf: Convert PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL to composable types Hao Luo
2021-12-06 23:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/9] bpf: Make per_cpu_ptr return rdonly PTR_TO_MEM Hao Luo
2021-12-07 6:18 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-12-08 3:54 ` Hao Luo
2021-12-10 17:42 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-12-10 18:36 ` Hao Luo
2021-12-06 23:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 8/9] bpf: Add MEM_RDONLY for helper args that are pointers to rdonly mem Hao Luo
2021-12-07 6:23 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-12-08 3:49 ` Hao Luo
2021-12-09 20:04 ` Hao Luo
2021-12-10 17:55 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-12-06 23:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 9/9] bpf/selftests: Test PTR_TO_RDONLY_MEM Hao Luo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+khW7ha6xCR8PGdrHpZRbkkFHCqT-V0kSXxzXR47zOz5e46WQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).