From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F761C433F5 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:18:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E6260F70 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:18:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233906AbhIQSTh (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:19:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33118 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230465AbhIQSTh (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:19:37 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x431.google.com (mail-pf1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::431]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7FAFC061574; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x431.google.com with SMTP id q23so7865077pfs.9; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:18:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hhjMxnkT2tEdZCVspZbIWpzonbsMYeKf1d2r8KDUExA=; b=S5LE1VlqH3TCrkq/EKd8BTCJnMaboUJPbpRSMDekPBpfLTkLsjh5RV46XHdPQ5/z+K GrGlW5qTlCzRuPEu8krOj/CnE8bghNc3b2kjaCjvc8aWV/iwjfs9VX88UYnxY+ByS3jN TSCnXB28zN4nPqrjcwoeoAsbqYpJGrYxMi5j3DWu4146YmN2N+wmhFJzUDfkkT8vkUDe aE991G5+zUMhTdTMPqfyWlhOjpvsLgcgcYBvswVFY4PsrEG/+fGzXVmztQzeQXfE4Gtf xi5Pqj9Z6fVHd/lgBey7NH7NKQzfpHPwRiNGHW2m891Ov6zihGB3Q/yh+VNmW4wcxvqA j1RQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hhjMxnkT2tEdZCVspZbIWpzonbsMYeKf1d2r8KDUExA=; b=qR7IMsrn8rsu4c+sJdTkeZxg+qTqt52EqqFdPvhXq8dUOmOxJwuMFg14U5sHhFyG5H L1Z3ibaOWDdJdicGJcF4tHAAhOn5vAvZLuzxj6Fg/JldfDVv3jbm6TlRlpWYXUYlGR9B yNJca/B+K0YCQ5WjnXZI4h/AS+xpJ0n3zZdEaFY5++DbeQ6+g0o+qyLNGRcwtbFt64jZ e7pdDM7Rw/OKDE7qAle/VnqfEOqaKFdAHWHOxm/QB1bT8tjuYwFJmtzpcZRhRnCjpiK8 Ld2JUHIj2dLIcFemPgr+ch1N5o4HM9pSeEeRYTT7QPEz6j3Y9FJEsqQGmcSV1/FV30Da mkHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ccW6rW9GXaIMmYsAxKKIiO3LLcvQUJTUUMkB7xdYTzk+ws/Mv XFUlHoY3hV0B7q18tERb9+84aaSxc3bY7u7vgqektYTl X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxzvlGOwI/RIGfPAAfVohtspnYpG9S8m5//Mn9xzkrL8ufGTIpb/hiZMq4vkL0EAibFnPC4t+LNqSlIQA2tC2o= X-Received: by 2002:a62:b515:0:b0:438:42ab:2742 with SMTP id y21-20020a62b515000000b0043842ab2742mr12358826pfe.77.1631902694201; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:18:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210913231108.19762-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20210913231108.19762-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:18:03 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next v2] net_sched: introduce eBPF based Qdisc To: Cong Wang Cc: Network Development , bpf , Cong Wang , Jamal Hadi Salim , Jiri Pirko Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 6:27 PM Cong Wang wrote: > --- > v2: Rebase on latest net-next > Make the code more complete (but still incomplete) What is the point of v2 when feedback on the first RFC was ignored?