From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789E3C433EF for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 04:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C471610E8 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 04:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229588AbhIVEFQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Sep 2021 00:05:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53212 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229495AbhIVEFQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Sep 2021 00:05:16 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x431.google.com (mail-pf1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::431]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC1B1C061574; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 21:03:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x431.google.com with SMTP id s16so1624280pfk.0; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 21:03:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3EAX5x2paiUePsUWAPEUUmMCJozumvmbUt4cnBaQ4XU=; b=Rk9cx67V5kuhZ80gd5BegeY1K5IlGGUsG7P6cSYN7i0VaO/qXvs385+7Kc2LlDhbVJ 2jHj7ebtGqbmJ/fNrWXdPn+22GiOpJS/QY6GEdZ/D2gbWCWmn25Utz8x6F6VzIeLnrJT e6EF0CYnI5H2MbH50Ex7n9D2+HhmomjcE0kX+rg/f9za7mf6987QpjhVwFRFwsuCbCuK b9uvu8Chn/4zBe30CJW3ZMK76jfT+PoiOJHo8jg+l+E2qDbEGX/kl0dO3XtVF9Q78S3/ oeHyeatbQfGXY3t1NpKBaAic68hT2WEGRjEZbPVOODepMLaUSUEryU8TvvKJ2UXetoDh U2uw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3EAX5x2paiUePsUWAPEUUmMCJozumvmbUt4cnBaQ4XU=; b=75SGUnz6vIPZrVkUkvsHfzM1JpOEsC95kBB2a0te57Y2x19xibK6FR3yPqv/M+wyeI Ti4KxbNyG23y/W53AcvSSjGsgyFnOMwIRmjszp9eP7+OoLH8XgiAU9v07qDwHdVpmMFv m4x1uG6DEFJenv1UgRg8el8ZLDPgPmE2bprMsPviGOwR6MQadtJa93zXp3jLSnILKN+9 fQ0swNo4cjzP3F57/Tkxq2IBxz4St+rkJdJJ9imHMEplQVvIi8EpUC/JdSIFrixHmC/K TgVTgXqg1JKMe+JLZAueOmNgfRalarCsbPbVojjn1WdUs49kY7hWX4XdoldBA67JelBs 5CMg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532leELO4VAGeTc5aW1CHXR/mVNcelbGq2gBTw6hRFptOTOnkM5p d7FiHAoP1wBTCWweOgQH6tejKgXRoVJ53Zb+NPI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw982+L2fNHEPQ8GplewO8OGfdWsW5Ka4MSd28P5pfEh5aBNbfkIZb2zyjfEHirQr3EB5rWank90umbmD/S55s= X-Received: by 2002:a65:4008:: with SMTP id f8mr30578034pgp.310.1632283426301; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 21:03:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210913231108.19762-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 21:03:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next v2] net_sched: introduce eBPF based Qdisc To: Cong Wang Cc: Network Development , bpf , Cong Wang , Jamal Hadi Salim , Jiri Pirko Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 8:59 PM Cong Wang wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:18 AM Alexei Starovoitov > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 6:27 PM Cong Wang wrote: > > > --- > > > v2: Rebase on latest net-next > > > Make the code more complete (but still incomplete) > > > > What is the point of v2 when feedback on the first RFC was ignored? > > They are not ignored for two reasons: > > 1) I responded to those reasonable ones in the original thread. Clearly > you missed them. Multiple people in the v1 thread made it clear that the approach presented in v1 is not generic enough. v2 made no attempt to address these concerns.