From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 00/34] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 18:54:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQJThW0_5jJ=0ejjc3jh+w9_qzctqfZ-GvJrNQcKiaGYEQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201201215900.3569844-1-guro@fb.com>
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:59 PM Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> wrote:
>
> 5) Cryptic -EPERM is returned on exceeding the limit. Libbpf even had
> a function to "explain" this case for users.
...
> v9:
> - always charge the saved memory cgroup, by Daniel, Toke and Alexei
> - added bpf_map_kzalloc()
> - rebase and minor fixes
This looks great. Applied.
Please follow up with a change to libbpf's pr_perm_msg().
That helpful warning should stay for old kernels, but it would be
misleading for new kernels.
libbpf probably needs a feature check to make this warning conditional.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-03 2:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-01 21:58 [PATCH bpf-next v9 00/34] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 01/34] mm: memcontrol: use helpers to read page's memcg data Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 02/34] mm: memcontrol/slab: use helpers to access slab page's memcg_data Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 03/34] mm: introduce page memcg flags Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 04/34] mm: convert page kmemcg type to a page memcg flag Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 05/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 06/34] bpf: prepare for memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 07/34] bpf: " Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 08/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 09/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 10/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 11/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 12/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 13/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 14/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 15/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 16/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 17/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 18/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 19/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 20/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 21/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 22/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 23/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 24/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 25/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 26/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 27/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 28/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 29/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 30/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 31/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 32/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 33/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 34/34] bpf: samples: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin
2020-12-03 2:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 00/34] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2020-12-03 2:54 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2020-12-03 3:26 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-12-05 0:37 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-12-08 2:53 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAADnVQJThW0_5jJ=0ejjc3jh+w9_qzctqfZ-GvJrNQcKiaGYEQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).