From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E98EC7618F for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 01:43:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7C0206C2 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 01:43:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="pWHMntmB" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725892AbfGQBna (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:43:30 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f196.google.com ([209.85.208.196]:34760 "EHLO mail-lj1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725850AbfGQBna (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:43:30 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f196.google.com with SMTP id p17so21929843ljg.1; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 18:43:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CBYf8JDvHIrto2ruQvIgRvAFcsxBu3VLgXTo2m9l288=; b=pWHMntmBUFFbR9oOTYhXOQIKrb9utEAL5LKLoV631LAk6sDw69BsIdDJg/CyHfgv/A puDBYitmhvwK/Xk5E/2pYJ1e5JBOY2i9mXZsoDxUZUtBFgR3ViVJMiFSYiPhq7aCeuDR 4Irf+accjwCqmcghCX4d0G52c/t+6mH9wEN7mkADXRM9p+G8XJ661frwlqE2WQHZG3OI 9kAnxILD7Shju5xC/MGcDkO/cmXLde9huq0D5+oNQV3AWF+mt6pFKlcKKi3AqffjtxYc IdX7z3L/i61rqC7OEKYjGLBJUAoQ+ruxfToYi4ScDvhXGjpc7a6cooOPSgfMGEVXOpjp W3jA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CBYf8JDvHIrto2ruQvIgRvAFcsxBu3VLgXTo2m9l288=; b=WwTXWZbTKUDb4j9nVBUYfJdszYsl2WRUvB/uxXdyQVR8nr1inMB8bZnRbC0xEJMhf0 zOH25c3jUkTA0+RaZLftTnK6HfE7Eg1+Cm77uxdv6MvOoAuUZ99k3mDMf8E6kDkqjoI/ HN51r6ZJ8DYaBT38inILcP8ECUe1bPh81NTHEpYg5pQaZvAVdVZMXZpz71a25y17oFIb D+LDmNRruWwl7RBqclTvDnpZ+pBH403KKm6N8wJUnEaPAzhyjk5rEGCrA2RMebXGMTy4 ZfRs/BHfn4jjWFXHq8twGn+cVJpENF3Qk9BvnQnseU7Md/Iyzs08uyR0slCDblQD6YAL VBXg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXaaNQoJlwetZUg9dwlgBKytsJUjX6fHRclREJ+nJNVvKQkDIfl wToBhakxr8uxG7de6ucQLqWyxx8SijuhCQu2fLk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyTZ7w25HCHw8hXV1ZpEi+UD3/Oxu9Thn0/cjED4IiVi70hWzZhmlgx6Wv9+JRrjdJGuZ4qrb4kOSOIQ3sClnU= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7818:: with SMTP id t24mr1008616ljc.210.1563327808247; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 18:43:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190716125827.24413-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 18:43:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: fix perf_buffer on s390 To: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich , bpf , Networking , gor@linux.ibm.com, Heiko Carstens Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: bpf-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:42 AM Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 5:59 AM Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > > > > perf_buffer test fails for exactly the same reason test_attach_probe > > used to fail: different nanosleep syscall kprobe name. > > > > Reuse the test_attach_probe fix. > > > > Fixes: ee5cf82ce04a ("selftests/bpf: test perf buffer API") > > Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich > > --- > > Thanks for the fix! > > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Applied. Thanks!