Re: [RFC bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add attach bench test

[Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 6:58 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 23:21:03 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > OK, I also confirmed that __bpf_tramp_exit is listed. (others seems no notrace)
> >
> > /sys/kernel/tracing # cat available_filter_functions | grep __bpf_tramp
> > __bpf_tramp_image_release
> > __bpf_tramp_image_put_rcu
> > __bpf_tramp_image_put_rcu_tasks
> > __bpf_tramp_image_put_deferred
> > __bpf_tramp_exit
> >
> > My gcc is older one.
> > gcc version 9.4.0 (Ubuntu 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04.1)
> >
> > But it seems that __bpf_tramp_exit() doesn't call __fentry__. (I objdump'ed)
> >
> > ffffffff81208270 <__bpf_tramp_exit>:
> > ffffffff81208270:       55                      push   %rbp
> > ffffffff81208271:       48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
> > ffffffff81208274:       53                      push   %rbx
> > ffffffff81208275:       48 89 fb                mov    %rdi,%rbx
> > ffffffff81208278:       e8 83 70 ef ff          callq  ffffffff810ff300 <__rcu_read_lock>
> > ffffffff8120827d:       31 d2                   xor    %edx,%edx
>
> You need to look deeper ;-)
> >
> >
> > >
> > > So it's quite bizarre and inconsistent.
> >
> > Indeed. I guess there is a bug in scripts/recordmcount.pl.
>
> No there isn't.
>
> I added the addresses it was mapping and found this:
>
> ffffffffa828f680 T __bpf_tramp_exit
>
> (which is relocated, but it's trivial to map it with the actual function).
>
> At the end of that function we have:
>
> ffffffff8128f767:       48 8d bb e0 00 00 00    lea    0xe0(%rbx),%rdi
> ffffffff8128f76e:       48 8b 40 08             mov    0x8(%rax),%rax
> ffffffff8128f772:       e8 89 28 d7 00          call   ffffffff82002000 <__x86_indirect_thunk_array>
>                         ffffffff8128f773: R_X86_64_PLT32        __x86_indirect_thunk_rax-0x4
> ffffffff8128f777:       e9 4a ff ff ff          jmp    ffffffff8128f6c6 <__bpf_tramp_exit+0x46>
> ffffffff8128f77c:       0f 1f 40 00             nopl   0x0(%rax)
> ffffffff8128f780:       e8 8b df dc ff          call   ffffffff8105d710 <__fentry__>
>                         ffffffff8128f781: R_X86_64_PLT32        __fentry__-0x4
> ffffffff8128f785:       b8 f4 fd ff ff          mov    $0xfffffdf4,%eax
> ffffffff8128f78a:       c3                      ret
> ffffffff8128f78b:       0f 1f 44 00 00          nopl   0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
>
>
> Notice the call to fentry!
>
> It's due to this:
>
> void notrace __bpf_tramp_exit(struct bpf_tramp_image *tr)
> {
>         percpu_ref_put(&tr->pcref);
> }
>
> int __weak
> arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *tr, void *image, void *image_end,
>                             const struct btf_func_model *m, u32 flags,
>                             struct bpf_tramp_progs *tprogs,
>                             void *orig_call)
> {
>         return -ENOTSUPP;
> }
>
> The weak function gets a call to ftrace, but it still gets compiled into
> vmlinux but its symbol is dropped due to it being overridden. Thus, the
> mcount_loc finds this call to fentry, and maps it to the symbol that is
> before it, which just happened to be __bpf_tramp_exit.

Ouch. That _is_ a bug in recordmocount.

> I made that weak function "notrace" and the __bpf_tramp_exit disappeared
> from the available_filter_functions list.

That's a hack. We cannot rely on such hacks for all weak functions.