From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F03CC433F5 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 20:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFE5613A0 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 20:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1346806AbhI2Uwr (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Sep 2021 16:52:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47330 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1346776AbhI2Uwr (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Sep 2021 16:52:47 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com (mail-pl1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7EFFC06161C; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:51:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id x8so2387426plv.8; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:51:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BoiIwPGlmB+GI+ljM6X3206faXHD3JRHXYQbXhb7vic=; b=fj70wDysjSxfYIARyPtKORSQCRSxDiq50TIsPVrvAFtxBHB9OmQEZkipDYrkaGNhQF mnLYvajf52becBYxnhU2yCaCTPCQCAkEmiGeovJMo/CFc0akSgncvOctbv+7msyhNong E5DpCqX97Jq2MHrgCMbqu2bQ79WjCD6OcUaMzOZCX5A4Dhjv49SdIPEFp8TllTJt8Ti4 i63RboSoLseoX0rMIsqkhEjD81yAbEuhd0KF8kSaFXzi52OBTDJQu8xalKn9+rzwHR1b CC2DxrSfaUSTi/zH5Lb3gbF4GApY3BPMTxXsfrDKA81l5XWZj/1xV2sGa8GgHg9uZgbv quOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BoiIwPGlmB+GI+ljM6X3206faXHD3JRHXYQbXhb7vic=; b=T+2lIjfE4dPANHLWv5l+JjVY+5O7zDxqRtAjeE+n4TuEEDnTJV2x4hYYlDKm8q03BH qk1zks36dqri5HB3g87OZScOxii6TcS45TxhAVg5SikzbIqO+Wv5QeDhORN8o+/aCPi3 68D1UBEzppcVvKiSZBjK2D3BoTIJ7tP/yDSuLkr7v9WhQ1712ltmnAmiQ9awGVv4ugOP 8GQCOrUB3oQ2qdZwsKFm/5ykyRYWcvISB63OXsRIa6twrNpdGnJa+VYmvFu5DDPAoxSh HHKZAt185hzPkZqgvsnXZ0dziuyt3VjArB5UqoHwuDeW8aFo5m0y3m9M41KHJMTv+h0b I1NQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Hf0V6Ad6Rgwt8aossgdAGu09yWfbmY7oL6xmf4rAJa+5lACNL 8KQFDv6eUgw8J+jeNRUUPdwAdPYuI3DAIXtiCH0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJytBLgObAivspTM44bl5d0f1bbY/VEvRYdRda6R9n+4SonlspblOYW0zOcXYdzNzelzbopgpUnUE4Ha9zD1uJA= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:1944:: with SMTP id 4mr2095181pjh.62.1632948665222; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:51:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210927145941.1383001-1-memxor@gmail.com> <20210927145941.1383001-9-memxor@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20210927145941.1383001-9-memxor@gmail.com> From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:50:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/12] libbpf: Make gen_loader data aligned. To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Cc: bpf , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= , Network Development Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 8:00 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote: > > From: Alexei Starovoitov > > Align gen_loader data to 8 byte boundary to make sure union bpf_attr, > bpf_insns and other structs are aligned. > > Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov > --- > tools/lib/bpf/gen_loader.c | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/gen_loader.c b/tools/lib/bpf/gen_loader.c > index 8df718a6b142..80087b13877f 100644 > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/gen_loader.c > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/gen_loader.c > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include "btf.h" > #include "bpf.h" > #include "libbpf.h" > @@ -135,13 +136,17 @@ void bpf_gen__init(struct bpf_gen *gen, int log_level) > > static int add_data(struct bpf_gen *gen, const void *data, __u32 size) > { > + __u32 size8 = roundup(size, 8); > + __u64 zero = 0; > void *prev; > > - if (realloc_data_buf(gen, size)) > + if (realloc_data_buf(gen, size8)) > return 0; > prev = gen->data_cur; > memcpy(gen->data_cur, data, size); > gen->data_cur += size; > + memcpy(gen->data_cur, &zero, size8 - size); > + gen->data_cur += size8 - size; Since we both need this patch, I pushed it to bpf-next to simplify rebasing.